Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson’s “feelies”
- 459 Downloads
A set of three experiments evaluated 96 participants’ ability to visually and haptically discriminate solid object shape. In the past, some researchers have found haptic shape discrimination to be substantially inferior to visual shape discrimination, while other researchers have found haptics and vision to be essentially equivalent. A primary goal of the present study was to understand these discrepant past findings and to determine the true capabilities of the haptic system. All experiments used the same task (same vs. different shape discrimination) and stimulus objects (James Gibson’s “feelies” and a set of naturally shaped objects—bell peppers). However, the methodology varied across experiments. Experiment 1 used random 3-dimensional (3-D) orientations of the stimulus objects, and the conditions were full-cue (active manipulation of objects and rotation of the visual objects in depth). Experiment 2 restricted the 3-D orientations of the stimulus objects and limited the haptic and visual information available to the participants. Experiment 3 compared restricted and full-cue conditions using random 3-D orientations. We replicated both previous findings in the current study. When we restricted visual and haptic information (and placed the stimulus objects in the same orientation on every trial), the participants’ visual performance was superior to that obtained for haptics (replicating the earlier findings of Davidson et al. in Percept Psychophys 15(3):539–543, 1974). When the circumstances resembled those of ordinary life (e.g., participants able to actively manipulate objects and see them from a variety of perspectives), we found no significant difference between visual and haptic solid shape discrimination.
KeywordsVision Haptics Shape perception Shape discrimination
We gratefully thank Patrick Cabe for helping us to locate what is probably the only remaining set of James Gibson’s “feelies.” We also thank David B. Baker, Director of the Archives of the History of American Psychology (http://www3.uakron.edu/ahap/), for allowing us to borrow and laser-scan the feelies.
- Caviness JA (1964) Visual and tactual perception of solid shape. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Cooke T, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2010) Multidimensional scaling analysis of haptic exploratory procedures. ACM TAP 7(1):7Google Scholar
- Foley JD, van Dam A, Feiner SK, Hughes JF (1996) Computer graphics: principles and practice, 2nd edn. in C., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
- Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Hilbert D, Cohn-Vossen S (1983) Geometry and the imagination. Chelsea, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Koenderink JJ (1990) Solid shape. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar