Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 221, Issue 3, pp 269–278 | Cite as

Adverse effects of viewing the hand on tactile-spatial selection between fingers depend on finger posture

Research Article

Abstract

Primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is known to rapidly adapt to task demands and to intermodal information (e.g. from vision). Here, we show that also intramodal information (i.e. posture) can affect tactile attentional selection processes and the intermodal effects of vision on those processes at S1 stages of processing. We manipulated the spatial separation between adjacent fingers, that is, thumb and index finger where close, far apart, or touching. Participants directed their attention to either the index finger or thumb to detect infrequent tactile targets at that location while either they saw their fingers or these were covered from view. In line with the previous results, we found that attentional selection affected early somatosensory processing (P45, N80) when fingers were near and this attention effect was abolished when fingers were viewed. When fingers were far or touching, attentional modulations appeared reliably only from the P100, and furthermore, enhanced tactile-spatial selection was found when touching fingers were viewed. Taken together, these results show for the first time a profound effect of finger posture on attentional selection between fingers and its modulations by vision at early cortical stages of processing. They suggest that the adverse effects of vision on tactile attention are not driven by a conflict between the selected information in vision (two fingers) and touch (one finger) and imply that external spatial information (i.e. finger posture) rapidly affects the organisation of primary somatosensory finger representations and that this further affects vision and tactile-spatial selection effects on S1.

Keywords

Visuo-tactile Somatosensory ERPs Spatial attention Finger posture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) to B.F.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Braun C, Haug M, Wiech K, Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Roberts LE (2002) Functional organization of primary somatosensory cortex depends on the focus of attention. Neuroimage 17:1451–1458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cardini F, Longo MR, Haggard P (2011) Vision of the body modulates somatosensory intracortical inhibition. Cereb Cortex 21:2014–2022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Craig JC (2003) The effect of hand position and pattern motion on temporal order judgments. Percept Psychophys 65:779–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. di Pellegrino G, Frassinetti F (2000) Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand. Curr Biol 10:1475–1477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Driver J, Grossenbacher P (1996) Multimodal constraints on tactile spatial attention. In: Innui T, McClelland J (eds) Attention and performance XVI. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–235Google Scholar
  6. Eimer M, Forster B, Fieger A, Harbich S (2004) Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention. Clin Neurophysiol 115:596–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gillmeister H, Sambo CF, Forster B (2010) Which finger? Early effects of attentional selection within the hand are absent when the hand is viewed. Eur J Neurosci 31:1874–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haggard P, Kitadono K, Press C, Taylor-Clarke M (2006) The brain’s fingers and hands. Exp Brain Res 172:94–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamada Y, Suzuki R (2005) Hand posture modulates cortical finger representation in SII. Neuroimage 25:708–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iguchi Y, Hoshi Y, Hashimoto I (2001) Selective spatial attention induces short-term plasticity in human somatosensory cortex. NeuroReport 12:3133–3136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inui K, Wang X, Tamura Y, Kaneoke Y, Kakigi R (2004) Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. Cereb Cortex 14:851–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansson RS (1976) Receptive-field sensitivity profile of mechanosensitive units innervating glabrous skin of human hand. Brain Res 104:330–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Làdavas E, Farnè A, Zeloni G, di Pellegrino G (2000) Seeing or not seeing where your hands are. Exp Brain Res 131:458–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Noppeney U, Waberski TD, Gobbele R, Buchner H (1999) Spatial attention modulates the cortical somatosensory representation of the digits in humans. NeuroReport 10:3137–3141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Overvliet KE, Anema HA, Brenner E, Dijkerman HC, Smeets JB (2011) Relative finger position influences whether you can localize tactile stimuli. Exp Brain Res 208:245–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Riemer M, Trojan J, Kleinböhl D, Hölzl R (2011) Body posture affects tactile discrimination and identification of fingers and hands. Exp Brain Res 206:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roberts RD, Humphreys GW (2010) The role of somatotopy and body posture in the integration of texture across the fingers. Psychol Sci 21:476–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rockstroh B, Vanni S, Elbert T, Hari R (1998) Extensive somatosensory stimulation alters somatosensory evoked fields. In: Aine C, Okada Y, Stroink G, Swithenby S, Wood C (eds) Advances in biomagnetism research: Biomag96 international conference on biomagnetism. Springer, New York, pp 848–851Google Scholar
  19. Röder B, Spence C, Rösler F (2002) Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition-of-return. Exp Brain Res 143:453–462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Röder B, Rösler F, Spence C (2004) Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. Curr Biol 14:121–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sakata H, Takaoka Y, Kawarasaki A, Shibutani H (1973) Somatosensory properties of neurons in the superior parietal cortex (area 5) of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 64:85–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sambo CF, Gillmeister H, Forster B (2009) Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch. Eur J Neurosci 30:143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schütz-Bosbach S, Musil JJ, Haggard P (2009) Touchant-touche: the role of self-touch in the representation of body structure. Conscious Cogn 18:2–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shibuya S, Takahashi T, Kitazawa S (2007) Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli. Exp Brain Res 179:709–721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sterr A, Muller MM, Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Pantev C, Taub E (1998) Changed perceptions in Braille readers. Nature 391:134–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Summers C, Lederman SJ (1990) Perceptual asymmetries in the somatosensory system. Cortex 26:201–226PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of EssexColchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCity University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations