Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 219, Issue 3, pp 369–379 | Cite as

Suprathreshold asymmetries in human motion perception

Research Article


Detection of asymmetries has been a mainstay of using vestibular reflexes to assess semicircular canal function. However, there has been relatively little work on how vestibular stimuli are perceived. Suprathreshold vestibular perception was measured in 13 normal healthy controls by having them compare the relative sizes of two yaw (vertical-axis rotation) or sway (right–left translation) stimuli. Both stimuli were 1.5 s in duration with a staircase used to adjust the relative size of the stimuli to find a pair of stimuli perceived as equal. Motion stimuli were delivered in darkness using a hexapod motion platform, and visual stimuli simulating motion were presented on a screen in the absence of platform motion. Both same direction (SD) and opposite direction (OD) stimuli were delivered in separate runs. After a two-interval stimulus, subjects reported which movement they perceived as larger. Cumulative distribution functions were fit to the responses so that the relative magnitudes of the two stimuli perceived as equal could be determined. For OD trial blocks, a directional asymmetry index was calculated to compare the relative size of perceived rightward and leftward motion. For all trial blocks, a temporal asymmetry index (TAI) was used to compare the relative size of the first and second intervals. Motion OD stimuli were perceived as equal in all subjects in yaw and all but one in sway. For visual OD stimuli, two subjects had slightly asymmetric responses for both sway and yaw. The TAI demonstrated asymmetry in 54 % in yaw, in which the second interval was perceived to be larger in all but one subject who had an asymmetry. For sway, only two subjects had a significant asymmetry. Visual stimuli produced a similar rate of asymmetry. The direction and magnitude of these asymmetries were not significantly correlated with those seen for motion stimuli. Asymmetries were found in a fraction with the TAI in SD stimuli for motion in yaw (42 %) and sway (33 %), as well as for vision in yaw (60 %) and sway (43 %). The precision at discriminating SD motion stimuli decreased significantly with age, but there was no difference in OD motion or visual stimuli.


Vestibular Semi-circular canals Otoliths 


  1. Addams R (1834) An account of a peculiar optical phenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body etc. Magaz J Sci. 3rd series 5:373–374Google Scholar
  2. Bárány R (1921) Diagnose von Krankheitserscheinungen im Bereiche des Otolithenapparates. Acta Otolaryngol 2:434–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson AJ, Brown SF (1989) Visual display lowers detection threshold of angular, but not linear, whole-body motion stimuli. Aviat Space Environ Med 60:629–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benson AJ, Spencer MB, Stott JR (1986) Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane. Aviat Space Environ Med 57:1088–1096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertolini G, Ramat S, Laurens J, Bockisch CJ, Marti S, Straumann D, Palla A (2011) Velocity storage contribution to vestibular self-motion perception in healthy human subjects. J Neurophysiol 105:209–223. doi:10.1152/jn.00154.2010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bestelmeyer PE, Rouger J, DeBruine LM, Belin P (2010) Auditory adaptation in vocal affect perception. Cognition 117:217–223. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark B (1967) Thresholds for the perception of angular acceleration in man. Aerosp Med 38:443–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Crane BT (2012) Fore-aft translation after effects. Exp Brain Res (in press)Google Scholar
  9. Crane BT, Demer JL (1998) Human horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex initiation: effects of acceleration, target distance, and unilateral deafferentation. J Neurophysiol 80:1151–1166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fetsch CR, Turner AH, Deangelis GC, Angelaki DE (2009) Dynamic re-weighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception. J Neurosci 29:15601–15612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gianna C, Heimbrand S, Gresty M (1996) Thresholds for detection of motion direction during passive lateral whole-body acceleration in normal subjects and patients with bilateral loss of labyrinthine function. Brain Res Bull 40:443–447; discussion 448-449Google Scholar
  12. Grabherr L, Nicoucar K, Mast FW, Merfeld DM (2008) Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency. Exp Brain Res 186:677–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gundry AJ (1978) Thresholds of perception for periodic linear motion. Aviat Space Environ Med 49:679–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (1988) A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol 45:737–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanayama R, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA, Brookes GB, Faldon ME, Nakamura T (1995) Perceptual studies in patients with vestibular neurectomy. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520(Pt 2):408–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kingma H (2005) Thresholds for perception of direction of linear acceleration as a possible evaluation of the otolith function. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 5:5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kohn A (2007) Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. J Neurophysiol 97:3155–3164. doi:10.1152/jn.00086.2007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levine SC, Glasscock M, McKennan KX (1990) Long-term results of labyrinthectomy. The Laryngoscope 100:125–127. doi:10.1288/00005537-199002000-00003 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. MacNeilage PR, Banks MS, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2010) Vestibular heading discrimination and sensitivity to linear acceleration in head and world coordinates. J Neurosci 30:9084–9094. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1304-10.2010 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mallery RM, Olomu OU, Uchanski RM, Militchin VA, Hullar TE (2010) Human discrimination of rotational velocities. Exp Brain Res. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale 204:11–20. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2288-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melvill Jones GM, Young LR (1978) Subjective detection of vertical acceleration: a velocity-dependent response? Acta Otolaryngol 85:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merfeld DM (2011) Signal detection theory and vestibular thresholds: I. Basic theory and practical considerations. Exp Brain Res. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2557-7 Google Scholar
  23. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S (2005a) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94:186–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S (2005b) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation. J Neurophysiol 94:199–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perez N, Martin E, Garcia-Tapia R (2003) Dizziness: relating the severity of vertigo to the degree of handicap by measuring vestibular impairment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:372–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reinhardt-Rutland AH (1998) Increasing-loudness aftereffect following decreasing-intensity adaptation: spectral dependence in interotic and monotic testing. Perception 27:473–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roditi RE, Crane BT (2011) Asymmetries in human vestibular perception thresholds. In: Association for research in Otolarngology, 34th annual meeting, Baltimore, MD, p 1006Google Scholar
  28. Roditi RE, Crane BT (2012) Directional asymmetries and age effects in human self-motion perception. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Seizova-Cajic T, Smith JL, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2007) Proprioceptive movement illusions due to prolonged stimulation: reversals and aftereffects. PLoS ONE 2:e1037. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001037 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soyka F, Robuffo Giordano P, Beykirch K, Bulthoff HH (2011) Predicting direction detection thresholds for arbitrary translational acceleration profiles in the horizontal plane. Exp Brain Res. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation cerebrale 209:95–107. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2523-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stefansson S, Imoto T (1986) Age-related changes in optokinetic and rotational tests. Am J Otol 7:193–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Strupp M, Brandt T (2009) Vestibular neuritis. Semin Neurol 29:509–519. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1241040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson P, Burr D (2009) Visual aftereffects. Curr Biol CB 19:R11–R14. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tian JR, Shubayev I, Baloh RW, Demer JL (2001) Impairments in the initial horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex of older humans. Exp Brain Res 137:309–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walsh EG (1961) Role of the vestibular apparatus in the perception of motion on a parallel swing. J Physiol 155:506–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG (2005) Characteristics and clinical applications of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials. Neurology 64:1682–1688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001a) The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63:1293–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001b) The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 63:1314–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and AnatomyUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations