Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 219, Issue 4, pp 447–455 | Cite as

Emotive hemispheric differences measured in real-life portraits using pupil diameter and subjective aesthetic preferences

Research Article

Abstract

The biased positioning of faces exposed to viewers of Western portraiture has suggested there may be fundamental differences in the lateralized expression and perception of emotion. The present study investigates whether there are differences in the perception of the left and right sides of the face in real-life photographs of individuals. The study paired conscious aesthetic ratings of pleasantness with measurements of pupil size, which are thought to be a reliable unconscious measure of interest first tested by Hess. Images of 10 men and 10 women were taken from the left and right sides of the face. These images were also mirror-reversed. As expected, we found a strong preference for left-sided portraits (regardless of original or mirror-reversed orientation), such that left hemifaces elicited higher ratings and greater pupil dilation. Interestingly, this effect was true of both sexes. A positive linear relationship was also found between pupil size and aesthetic ratings such that pupil size increased with pleasantness ratings. These findings provide support for the notions of lateralized emotion, right-hemispheric dominance, pupillary dilation to pleasant images, and constriction to unpleasant images.

Keywords

Emotional hemispheric laterality Valence hypothesis Aesthetic pleasantness Pupil dilation/constriction Face perception 

References

  1. Aboyoun DC, Dabbs JM (1998) The Hess pupil dilation findings: sex or novelty? Soc Behav Pers 26:415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borod JC, Caron HS (1980) Facedness and emotion related to lateral dominance, sex and expression type. Neuropsychologia 18:237–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borod JC, Haywood CS, Koff E (1997) Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychol Rev 7:41–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley MM, Miccoli L, Escrig MA, Lang PJ (2008) The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiol 45:602–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodal A (1965) The cranial nerves. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Darwin C (1872) The expression of the emotions in man and animals. D. Appleton and Company, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson RJ (1995) Cerebral asymmetry, emotion, and affective style. In: Davidson RJ, Hughdahl K (eds) Brain asymmetry. MIT Press, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Demaree HA, Everhart DE, Youngstrom EA, Harrison DW (2005) Brain lateralization of emotional processing: historical roots and a future incorporating “dominance”. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 58:330–341Google Scholar
  9. Doughty MJ (2002) Further assessment of gender-and blink pattern-related differences in the spontaneous eyeblink activity in primary gaze in young adult humans. Optom Vis Sci 79(7):439–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duchowski AT (2007) Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Fridlund AJ, Izard C (1983) Electromyographic studies of facial expressions of emotions and patterns of emotion. In: Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (eds) Social psychophysiology: a sourcebook. Guilford Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert C, Bakan P (1973) Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Neuropsychologia 11:355–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldwater BC (1972) Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychol Bull 77:340–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grüsser OJ, Selke T, Zynda B (1988) Cerebral lateralization and some implications for art, aesthetic perception, and artistic creativity. In: Reutshcler I, Herzberger B, Epstein D (eds) Beauty and the brain: biological aspects of aesthetics. Berkhäuer Verlag, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess EH, Polt JM (1960) Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science 132:349–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hess EH, Beaver PW, Shrout PE (1975) Brightness contrast effects in a pupillometric experiment. Percept Psychophys 18(2):125–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janisse MP (1973) Pupil size and affect: a critical review of the literature since 1960. Can Psychol 14:311–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kowner R (1995) Laterality in facial expressions and its effect on attributions of emotion and personality: a reconsideration. Neuropsychologia 33(5):539–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lowenfeld IE (1999) The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. McManus IC (2005) Symmetry and asymmetry in aesthetics and the arts. Eur Rev 13(2):157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McManus IC, Humphrey N (1973) Turning the left cheek. Nature 243:271–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Powell WR, Schirillo JA (2009) Asymmetrical facial expressions in portraits and hemispheric laterality: a literature review. Laterality: asymmetries of body, brain, and cognition 14(6):545–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Powell WR, Schirillo JA (2011) Hemispheric laterality measured in Rembrandt’s portraits using pupil diameter and aesthetic verbal judgments. Cogn Emot 25(5):868–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rinn WE (1984) The neuropsychology of facial expression: a review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for producing facial expressions. Psychol Bull 95:52–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell PA, George DA (1990) Relationships between aesthetic response scales applied to paintings. Empir Stud Arts 8:15–30Google Scholar
  26. Sackheim HA, Gur RC (1983) Facial asymmetry and the communication of emotion. In: Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (eds) Social psychophysiology. Guilford, NYGoogle Scholar
  27. Sackheim HA, Gur RC, Saucy MC (1978) Emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of the face. Science 202:434–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schirillo J (2000) Hemispheric asymmetries and gender influence Rembrandt’s portrait orientations. Neuropsychologia 38:1593–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schirillo J, Fox M (2006) Rembrandt’s portraits: approach or avoid? Leonardo 39(3):253–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations