Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 219, Issue 2, pp 293–304 | Cite as

Control of aperture closure initiation during trunk-assisted reach-to-grasp movements

  • Miya K. Rand
  • Arend W. A. Van Gemmert
  • Abul B. M. I. Hossain
  • Yury P. Shimansky
  • George E. Stelmach
Research Article

Abstract

The present study investigated how the involvement and direction of trunk movement during reach-to-grasp movements affect the coordination between the transport and grasping components. Seated young adults made prehensile movements in which the involvement of the trunk was varied; the trunk was not involved, moved forward (flexion), or moved backward (extension) in the sagittal plane during the reach to the object. Each of the trunk movements was combined with an extension or flexion motion of the arm during the reach. Regarding the relationship between the trunk and arm motion for arm transport, the onset of wrist motion relative to that of the trunk was delayed to a greater extent for the trunk extension than for the trunk flexion. The variability of the time period from the peak of wrist velocity to the peak of trunk velocity was also significantly greater for trunk extension compared to trunk flexion. These findings indicate that trunk flexion was better integrated into the control of wrist transport than trunk extension. In terms of the temporal relationship between wrist transport and grip aperture, the relationship between the time of peak wrist velocity and the time of peak grip aperture did not change or become less steady across conditions. Therefore, the stability of temporal coordination between wrist transport and grip aperture was maintained despite the variation of the pattern of intersegmental coordination between the arm and the trunk during arm transport. The transport–aperture coordination was further assessed in terms of the control law according to which the initiation of aperture closure during the reach occurs when the hand crosses a hand-to-target distance threshold for grasp initiation, which is a function of peak aperture, wrist velocity and acceleration, trunk velocity and acceleration, and trunk-to-target distance at the time of aperture closure initiation. The participants increased the hand-to-target distance threshold for grasp initiation in the conditions where the trunk was involved compared to the conditions where the trunk was not involved. An increase also occurred when the trunk was extended compared to when it was flexed. The increased distance threshold implies an increase in the hand-to-target distance-related safety margin for grasping when the trunk is involved, especially when it is extended. These results suggest that the CNS significantly utilizes the parameters of trunk movement together with movement parameters related to the arm and the hand for controlling grasp initiation.

Keywords

Prehension Kinematics Coordination Control law Finger Trunk 

References

  1. Bertram CP, Lemay M, Stelmach GE (2005) The effect of Parkinson’s disease on the control of multi-segmental coordination. Brain Cogn 57:16–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Churchill A, Hopkins B, Rönnqvist L, Vogt S (2000) Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:81–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jackson SR, Jackson GM, Rosicky J (1995) Are non-relevant objects represented in working memory? The effect of non-target objects on reach and grasp kinematics. Exp Brain Res 102:519–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaminski TR, Bock C, Gentile AM (1995) The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 106:457–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ma S, Feldman AG (1995) Two functionally different synergies during arm reaching movements involving the trunk. J Neurophysiol 73:2120–2122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Marteniuk RG, Bertram CP (2001) Contributions of gait and trunk movements to prehension: perspectives from world- and body-centered coordination. Mot Control 2:151–165Google Scholar
  7. Naslin P (1969) Essentials of optimal control. Boston Technical Publishers, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Pigeon P, Feldman AG (1998) Compensatory arm-trunk coordination in pointing movements is preserved in the absence of visual feedback. Brain Res 802:274–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pigeon P, Yahia LH, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG (2000) Superposition of independent units of coordination during pointing movements involving the trunk with and without visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 131:336–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pigeon P, Bortolami SB, DiZio P, Lackner JR (2003) Coordinated turn-and-reach movements. I. Anticipatory compensation for self-generated Coriolis and interaction torques. J Neurophysiol 89:276–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poizner H, Feldman AG, Levin MF, Berkinblit MB, Hening WA, Patel A, Adamovich SV (2000) The timing of arm-trunk coordination is deficient and vision-dependent in Parkinson’s patients during reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 133:279–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rand MK, Shimansky Y, Stelmach GE, Bloedel JR (2004) Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations. Exp Brain Res 154:50–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rand MK, Smiley-Oyen AL, Shimansky YP, Bloedel JR, Stelmach GE (2006a) Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 168:131–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rand MK, Squire LM, Stelmach GE (2006b) Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 174:74–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rand MK, Lemay M, Squire LM, Shimansky YP, Stelmach GE (2007) Role of vision in aperture closures control during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 181:447–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rand MK, Shimansky Y, Hossain ABM, Stelmach GE (2008) Quantitative model of transport-aperture coordination during reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 174:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rand MK, Lemay M, Squire LM, Shimansky YP, Stelmach GE (2010a) Control of aperture closure initiation during reach-to-grasp movements under manipulations of visual feedback and trunk involvement in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 201:509–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rand MK, Shimansky YP, Hossain ABMI, Stelmach GE (2010b) Phase dependence of transport-aperture coordination variability reveals control strategy of reach-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res 207:49–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rossi E, Mitnitski A, Feldman AG (2002) Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans. J Physiol 538(2):659–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saling M, Stelmach GE, Mescheriakov S, Berger M (1996) Prehension with trunk assisted reaching. Behav Brain Res 80:153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seidler RD, Stelmach GE (2000) Trunk-assisted prehension: specification of body segments with imposed temporal constraints. J Mot Behav 32:379–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M, Young D, Proteau L (1993) Determining movement onsets from temporal series. J Mot Behav 25:97–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang J, Stelmach GE (2001) Spatial and temporal control of trunk-assisted prehensile actions. Exp Brain Res 136:231–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang J, Stelmach GE (2006) Altered coordination patterns in parkinsonian patients during trunk-assisted prehension. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 12:211–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang F, Feldman AG (2010) Reach-to-grasp movement as a minimization process. Exp Brain Res 201:75–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miya K. Rand
    • 1
  • Arend W. A. Van Gemmert
    • 2
  • Abul B. M. I. Hossain
    • 3
  • Yury P. Shimansky
    • 4
  • George E. Stelmach
    • 5
  1. 1.Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo)DortmundGermany
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.Electrical Engineering, Ira A. Fulton School of EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  4. 4.School of Biological and Health Systems EngineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  5. 5.Motor Control LaboratoryArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations