Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 219, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Neural correlates of oddball detection in self-motion heading: A high-density event-related potential study of vestibular integration

  • H. Nolan
  • J. S. Butler
  • R. Whelan
  • J. J. Foxe
  • H. H. Bülthoff
  • R. B. Reilly
Research Article

Abstract

The perception of self-motion is a product of the integration of information from both visual and non-visual cues, to which the vestibular system is a central contributor. It is well documented that vestibular dysfunction leads to impaired movement and balance, dizziness and falls, and yet our knowledge of the neuronal processing of vestibular signals remains relatively sparse. In this study, high-density electroencephalographic recordings were deployed to investigate the neural processes associated with vestibular detection of changes in heading. To this end, a self-motion oddball paradigm was designed. Participants were translated linearly 7.8 cm on a motion platform using a one second motion profile, at a 45° angle leftward or rightward of straight ahead. These headings were presented with a stimulus probability of 80–20 %. Participants responded when they detected the infrequent direction change via button-press. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were calculated in response to the standard (80 %) and target (20 %) movement directions. Statistical parametric mapping showed that ERPs to standard and target movements differed significantly from 490 to 950 ms post-stimulus. Topographic analysis showed that this difference had a typical P3 topography. Individual participant bootstrap analysis revealed that 93.3 % of participants exhibited a clear P3 component. These results indicate that a perceived change in vestibular heading can readily elicit a P3 response, wholly similar to that evoked by oddball stimuli presented in other sensory modalities. This vestibular-evoked P3 response may provide a readily and robustly detectable objective measure for the evaluation of vestibular integrity in various disease models.

Keywords

Electroencephalography Evoked potentials Vestibular Heading Self-motion P3 Cognition 

Supplementary material

221_2012_3059_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (202 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 202 kb)

References

  1. Angelaki DE, Cullen KE (2008) Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:125–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett-Cowan M, Harris L (2009) Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound. Exp Brain Res 198:221–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett-Cowan M, Nolan H, Butler JS, Foxe JJ, Reilly RB, Bülthoff HH (2010) Reaction time and event-related potentials to visual, auditory and vestibular stimuli. J Vis 10:1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter B, Travis RC (1938) The reaction time to vestibular stimuli. J Exp Psychol 22:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson AJ, Spencer MB, Stott JR (1986) Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane. Aviat Space Environ Med 57:1088–1096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremmer F, Duhamel JR, Ben Hamed S, Graf W (2002a) Heading encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Eur J Neurosci 16:1554–1568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bremmer F, Klam F, Duhamel JR, Ben Hamed S, Graf W (2002b) Visual-vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Eur J Neurosci 16:1569–1586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler JS, Smith ST, Campos JL, Bülthoff HH (2010) Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading. J Vision 10:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler JS, Campos JL, Bülthoff HH, Smith S (2011) The role of stereo vision in visual-vestibular integration. Seeing Perceiving 24(5):453–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campos JL, Siegle JH, Mohler BJ, Bülthoff HH, Loomis JM (2009) Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method. PLoS ONE 4:e7793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Winkel KN, Weesie J, Werkhoven PJ, Groen EL (2010) Integration of visual and inertial cues in perceived heading of self-motion. J Vision 10:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fetsch CR, Turner AH, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2009) Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception. J Neurosci 29:15601–15612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fetsch CR, Rajguru SM, Karunaratne A, Gu Y, Angelaki DE, Deangelis GC (2010) Spatiotemporal properties of vestibular responses in area MSTd. J Neurophysiol 104:1506–1522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:355–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JB, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ (1995) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2:189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrido MI, Friston KJ, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Baldeweg T, Kilner JM (2008) The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm. Neuroimage 42:936–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goncharova II, McFarland DJ, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR (2003) EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1580–1593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gramann K, Gwin JT, Bigdely-Shamlo N, Ferris DP, Makeig S (2010) Visual evoked responses during standing and walking. Front Hum Neurosci 4:202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Groen EL, Bles W (2004) How to use body tilt for the simulation of linear self motion. J Vestibul Res-Equil 14:375–385Google Scholar
  21. Gu Y, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2007) A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals. Nat Neurosci 10:1038–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gu Y, Angelaki DE, DeAngelis GC (2008) Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd. Nat Neurosci 11:1201–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gu Y, Fetsch CR, Adeyemo B, Deangelis GC, Angelaki DE (2010) Decoding of MSTd population activity accounts for variations in the precision of heading perception. Neuron 66:596–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP (2010) Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J Neurophysiol 103:3526–3534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofferberth B (1995) The clinical significance of vestibular evoked potentials (REP). Acta Otolaryngol 115:124–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hood JD, Kayan A (1985) Observations upon the evoked responses to natural vestibular stimulation. Electroenceph and Clin Neurophysiol 62:266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Israel I, Rivaud S, Gaymard B, Berthoz A, Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1995) Cortical control of vestibular-guided saccades in man. Brain 118:1169–1183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Juckel G, Clotz F, Frodl T, Kawohl W, Hampel H, Pogarell O et al (2008) Diagnostic usefulness of cognitive auditory event-related P300 subcomponents in patients with Alzheimers disease? J Clin Neurophys 25:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kappenman ES, Luck SJ (2010) The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. Psychophysiology 47:888–904PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Katayama JI, Polich J (1999) Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 110:463–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolchev C (1995) Vestibular late evoked potentials (VbEP) processed by means of brain electrical activity mapping (BEAM). Acta Otolaryngol 115:130–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loose R, Probst T, Tucha O, Bablok E, Aschenbrenner S, Lange KW (2002) Vestibular evoked potentials from the vertical semicircular canals in humans evoked by roll-axis rotation in microgravity and under 1-G. Behav Brain Res 134:131–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez C, Blanke O (2011) The thalamocortical vestibular system in animals and humans. Brain Res Rev 67:119–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacNeilage PR, Banks MS, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2010) Vestibular heading discrimination and sensitivity to linear acceleration in head and world coordinates. J Neurosci 30:9084–9094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mallinson AI, Longride NS (2004) Caloric response does not decline with age. J Vestib Res 14:393–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Manly BFJ (2006) Boostrap tests. In: Manly BFJ (ed) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, pp 99–101Google Scholar
  37. Morgan CD, Murphy C (2002) Olfactory event-related potentials in Alzheimer’s disease. J Internat Neuropsych Soc 8:753–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan CD, Geisler MW, Covington JW, Polich J, Murphy C (1999) Olfactory P3 in young and older adults. Psychophysiol 36:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nieuwenhuizen FM, Zaal PMT, Mulder M, van Paassen MM, Mulder JA (2009) Modeling human multi-channel perception and control using linear time-invariant models. J Guid Control Dyn 31:999–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB, Bulthoff HH, Butler JS (2009) Acquisition of human EEG data during linear self-motion on a Stewart platform. 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering. Antalya, Turkey, pp 585–588Google Scholar
  41. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB (2010) FASTER: fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J Neurosci Methods 192:152–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nolan H, Butler JS, Whelan R, Foxe JJ, Bulthoff HH, Reilly RB (2011a) Motion P3 demonstrates neural nature of motion ERPs. 33rd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. Boston, USA, pp 3884–3887Google Scholar
  43. Nolan H, Butler JS, Whelan R, Foxe JJ, Bulthoff HH, Reilly RB (2011b) Electrophysiological source analysis of passive self-motion. Neural Engineering (NER), 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on, pp 53–56Google Scholar
  44. Ohmi M (1996) Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 5:87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Polich J (1993) Cognitive Brain Potentials. Curr Directions in Psych Sci 2:175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Polich J (1998) P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J Clin Neurophysiol 15:14–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2128–2148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Polich J, Heine MR (1996) P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm. Psychophysiology 33:747–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rodionov V, Elidan J, Sohmer H (1996) Analysis of the middle latency evoked potentials to angular acceleration impulses in man. Electroenceph and Clin Neurophysiol 100:354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salisbury DF, Rutherford B, Shenton ME, McCarley RW (2003) Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1676–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Setti A, Burke KE, Kenny RA, Newell F (2011) Is inefficient multisensory processing associated with falls in older people? Exp Brain Res 209:375–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Séverac Cauquil A, Faldon M, Popov K, Day BL, Bronstein AM (2003) Short-latency eye movements evoked by near-threshold galvanic vestibular stimulation. Exp Brain Res 148:414–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER (1965) Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150(700):1187–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Telford L, Howard IP, Ohmi M (1995) Heading judgments during active and passive self-motion. Exp Brain Res 104:502–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Teufel HJ, Nusseck H-G, Beykirch KA, Butler JS, Kerger M and Bülthoff HH (2007) MPI Motion Simulator: Development and Analysis of a Novel Motion Simulator. AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and ExhibitGoogle Scholar
  56. von der Heyde M (2001) A distributed virtual reality system for spatial updating: concepts, implementation, and experiments. Dissertation, Universität BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  57. Walsh EG (1961) Role of the vestibular apparatus in the perception of motion on a parallel swing. J Physiol 155:506–513Google Scholar
  58. Whelan R, Lonergan R, Kiiski H, Nolan H, Kinsella K, Bramham J et al (2010) A high-density ERP study reveals latency, amplitude, and topographical differences in multiple sclerosis patients versus controls. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1420–1426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Nolan
    • 1
  • J. S. Butler
    • 2
    • 3
  • R. Whelan
    • 1
    • 5
  • J. J. Foxe
    • 3
  • H. H. Bülthoff
    • 2
    • 4
  • R. B. Reilly
    • 1
  1. 1.The Trinity Centre for BioengineeringTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute for Biological CyberneticsTübingenGermany
  3. 3.The Sheryl and Daniel R. Tishman Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Children’s Evaluation and Rehabilitation Center (CERC), Departments of Pediatrics and NeuroscienceAlbert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA
  4. 4.Department of Brain and Cognitive EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations