Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 218, Issue 4, pp 503–514 | Cite as

Remapping of the line motion illusion across eye movements

  • David Melcher
  • Alessio Fracasso
Research Article


Although motion processing in the brain has been classically studied in terms of retinotopically defined receptive fields, recent evidence suggests that motion perception can occur in a spatiotopic reference frame. We investigated the underlying mechanisms of spatiotopic motion perception by examining the role of saccade metrics as well as the capacity of trans-saccadic motion. To this end, we used the line motion illusion (LMI), in which a straight line briefly shown after a high contrast stimulus (inducer) is perceived as expanding away from the inducer position. This illusion provides an interesting test of spatiotopic motion because the neural correlates of this phenomenon have been found early in the visual cortex and the effect does not require focused attention. We measured the strength of LMI both with stable fixation and when participants were asked to perform a 10° saccade during the blank ISI between the inducer and the line. A strong motion illusion was found across saccades in spatiotopic coordinates. When the inducer was presented near in time to the saccade cue, saccadic latencies were longer, saccade amplitudes were shorter, and the strength of reported LMI was consistently reduced. We also measured the capacity of the trans-saccadic LMI by varying the number of inducers. In contrast to a visual-spatial memory task, we found that the LMI was largely eliminated by saccades when two or more inducers were displayed. Together, these results suggest that motion perceived in non-retinotopic coordinates depends on an active, saccade-dependent remapping process with a strictly limited capacity.


Remapping Line motion illusion Visual stability Eye movements 



This work has been realized thanks to the support from the Provincia Autonoma di Trento and the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Trento e Rovereto. D.M. was supported by the Italian Ministry of Education and Research, MIUR projects PRIN 2007 and PRIN 2009.


  1. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59(4):390–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakola S, Gregoriou GG, Moschovakis AK, Raos V, Savaki HE (2007) Saccade-related information in the superior temporal motion complex: quantitative functional mapping in the monkey. J Neurosci 27(9):2224–2229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman R, Colby C (2009) Attention and active vision. Vision Res 49(10):1233–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boi M, Öğmen H, Herzog MH (2011) Motion and tilt aftereffects occur largely in retinal, not in object, coordinates in the Ternus-Pikler display. J Vis 11(3):7, 1–11. doi: 10.1167/11.3
  5. Bompas A, Sumner P (2009) Temporal dynamics of saccadic distraction. J Vis 9(9):1–14, 17. doi: 10.1167/9.9.17 Google Scholar
  6. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10(4):433–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bremmer F, Kubischik M, Hoffmann KP, Krekelberg B (2009) Neural dynamics of saccadic suppression. J Neurosci 29(40):12374–12383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burr DC, Thompson P (2011) Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010. Vis Res 51:1431–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castet E (2010) Perpection of intra-saccadic motion. In: Ilg UJ, Masson GS (eds) Dynamics of visual motion processing, neuronal, behavioral and computational approaches. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavanagh P, Hunt AR, Afraz A, Rolfs M (2010) Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends Cogn Sci 14(4):147–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cloherty SL, Mustari MJ, Rosa MGP, Ibbotson MR (2010) Effects of saccades on visual processing in primate MSTd. Vis Res 50(24):2683–2691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins T (2010) Extra retinal signal metrics in multiple-saccade sequences. J Vis 10(14):7, 1–14. doi: 10.1167/10.14.7 Google Scholar
  13. Cornelissen FW, Peters EM, Palmer J (2002) The eye link toolbox: eye tracking with MATLAB and the psychophysics toolbox. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34:613–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crapse TB, Sommer MA (2008) Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(8):587–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Currie CB, McConkie GW, Carlson-Radvansky LA, Irwin DE (2000) The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world. Percept Psychophys 62(4):673–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. d’Avossa G, Tosetti M, Crespi S, Biagi L, Burr DC, Morrone MC (2007) Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT. Nat Neurosci 10(2):249–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ezzati A, Golzar A, Afraz AS (2008) Topography of the motion aftereffect with and without eye movements. J Vis 8(14):2316–2321. doi: 10.1167/8.14.23 Google Scholar
  18. Fracasso A, Caramazza A, Melcher D (2010) Continuous perception of motion and shape across saccadic eye movements. J Vis 10(13):117–141. doi: 10.1167/10.13.14 Google Scholar
  19. Fuller S, Carrasco M (2009) Perceptual consequences of visual performance fields: The case of the line motion illusion. J Vision 9(4):117–131. doi: 10.1167/9.4.13 Google Scholar
  20. Gardner JL, Merriam EP, Movshon JA, Heeger DJ (2008) Maps of visual space in human occipital cortex are retinotopic, not spatiotopic. J Neurosci 28(15):3988–3999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gottlieb JP, Kusunoki M, Goldberg ME (1998) The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 391:481–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibbotson MR, Crowder NA, Cloherty SL, Price NSC, Mustari MJ (2008) Saccadic modulation of neural responses: possible roles in saccadic suppression, enhancement, and time compression. J Neurosci 28(43):10952–10960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Irwin DE (1991) Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cogn Psychol 23(3):420–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaeger TF (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J Mem Lang 59(4):434–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jancke D, Chavane F, Naaman S, Grinvald A (2004) Imaging cortical correlates of illusion in early visual cortex. Nature 428(6981):423–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joiner WM, Cavanaugh J, Wurtz RH (2011) Modulation of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field by visual salience. J Neurophysiol 106(3):1179–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaunitz L, Fracasso A, Melcher D (2011) Unseen complex motion is modulated by attention and generates a visible aftereffect. J Vis 11(13):1–9, 10. doi: 10.1167/11.13.10 Google Scholar
  28. Kawahara J, Yokosawa K, Nishida S, Sato T (1996) Illusory line motion in visual search: attentional facilitation or apparent motion? Perception 25(8):901–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knapen T, Rolfs M, Cavanagh P (2009) The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic. J Vis 9(5):1–6, 16. doi: 10.1167/9.5.16 Google Scholar
  30. Mathot S, Theeuwes J (2010) Evidence for the predictive remapping of visual attention. Exp Brain Res 200(1):117–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matin E (1974) Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. Psychol Bull 81:899–917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melcher D (2009) Selective attention and the active remapping of object features in trans-saccadic perception. Vis Res 49:1249–1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melcher D (2011) Visual stability. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:468–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Melcher D, Colby CL (2008) Trans-saccadic perception. Trends Cogn Sci 12(12):466–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Melcher D, Morrone MC (2003) Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements. Nat Neurosci 6(8):877–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munoz DP, Waitzman DM, Wurtz RH (1996) Activity of neurons in monkey superior colliculus during interrupted saccades. J Neurophysiol 75:2562–2580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Niemeier M, Crawford JD, Tweed D (2003) Optimal transsaccadic integration explains distorted spatial perception. Nature 422(6927):76–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ong WS, Hooshvar N, Zhang MS, Bisley JW (2009) Psychophysical evidence for spatiotopic processing in area MT in a short-term memory for motion task. J Neurophysiol 102(4):2435–2440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pelli DG (1997) The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10(4):437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prime Sl, Vesia M, Crawford JD (2011) Cortical mechanisms for trans-saccadic memory and integration of multiple object features. Philos T R Soc B 366:540–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rock I, Ebenholtz S (1962) Stroboscopic movement based on change of phenomenal rather than retinal location. Am J Psychol 75:193–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skottun BC (2011) Amplitude spectra of line-motion stimuli. Perception 40(6):656–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH (2002) A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements. Science 296(5572):1480–1482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH (2004) What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. II. Role of the SC-MD-FEF pathway in corollary discharge. J Neurophysiol 91(3):1403–1423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH (2006) Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex. Nature 444(7117):374–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH (2008) Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 31:317–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Szinte M, Cavanagh P (2011) Spatiotopic apparent motion reveals local variations in space constancy. J Vis 11(2):16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vogel EK, Woodman GF, Luck SJ (2001) Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum 27:92–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Von Grunau M, Dube S, Kwas M (1996) Two contributions to motion induction: a preattentive effect and facilitation due to attentional capture. Vis Res 36(16):2447–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker R, Deubel H, Schneider WX, Findlay JM (1997) Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. J Neurophysiol 78(2):1108–1119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wenderoth P, Wiese M (2008) Retinotopic encoding of the direction aftereffect. Vis Res 48(19):1949–1954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wurtz RH, Joiner WM, Berman RA (2011) Neuronal mechanisms for visual stability: progress and problems. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:503–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang E, Li W (2010) Perceptual learning beyond retinotopic reference frame. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:15969–15974PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive Sciences, Center for Mind/Brain SciencesUniversity of TrentoRoveretoItaly

Personalised recommendations