Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 216, Issue 4, pp 489–497 | Cite as

Hands behind your back: effects of arm posture on tactile attention in the space behind the body

Research Article

Abstract

Previous research has shown that tactile-spatial information originating from the front of the body is remapped from an anatomical to an external spatial coordinate system, guided by the availability of visual information early in development. Comparably little is known about regions of space for which visual information is not typically available, such as the space behind the body. This study tests for the first time the electrophysiological correlates of the effects of proprioceptive information on tactile-attentional mechanisms in the space behind the back. Observers were blindfolded and tactually cued to detect infrequent tactile targets on either their left or right hand and to respond to them either vocally or with index finger movements. We measured event-related potentials to tactile probes on the hands in order to explore tactile-spatial attention when the hands were either held close together or far apart behind the observer’s back. Results show systematic effects of arm posture on tactile-spatial attention different from those previously found for front space. While attentional selection is typically more effective for hands placed far apart than close together in front space, we found that selection occurred more rapidly for close than far hands behind the back, during both covert attention and movement preparation tasks. This suggests that proprioceptive space may “wrap” around the body, following the hands as they extend horizontally from the front body midline to the center of the back.

Keywords

Tactile Spatial attention Somatosensory ERPs Body representation 

References

  1. Allison T, McCarthy G, Wood CC, Williamson PD, Spencer DD (1989) Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve II. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating long-latency activity. J Neurophysiol 62:711–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Azañón E, Soto-Faraco S (2008) Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Curr Biol 18:1044–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azañón E, Camacho K, Soto-Faraco S (2010a) Tactile remapping beyond space. Eur J Neurosci 31:1858–1867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azañón E, Longo MR, Soto-Faraco S, Haggard P (2010b) The posterior parietal cortex remaps touch into external space. Curr Biol 20:1304–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolognini N, Maravita A (2007) Proprioceptive alignment of visual and somatosensory maps in the posterior parietal cortex. Curr Biol 17:1890–1895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Santis L, Spierer L, Clarke S, Murray MM (2007) Getting in touch: segregated somatosensory what and where pathways in humans revealed by electrical neuroimaging. Neuroimage 37:890–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desmedt JE, Robertson D (1977) Differential enhancement of early and late components of the cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials during forced-paced cognitive tasks in man. J Physiol 271:761–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Driver J, Grossenbacher P (1996) Multimodal constraints on tactile spatial attention. In: Innui T, McClelland J (eds) Attention and performance XVI. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–235Google Scholar
  9. Eimer M, Forster B (2003) Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention. Exp Brain Res 151:24–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eimer M, Cockburn D, Smedley B, Driver J (2001) Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Exp Brain Res 139:398–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eimer M, van Velzen J, Forster B, Driver J (2003) Shifts of attention in light and in darkness: an ERP study of supramodal attentional control and crossmodal links in spatial attention. Cogn Brain Res 15:308–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eimer M, Forster B, Fieger A, Harbich S (2004) Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention. Clin Neurophysiol 115:596–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forster B, Eimer M (2007) Covert unimanual response preparation triggers attention shifts to effectors rather than goal locations. Neurosci Lett 419:142–146Google Scholar
  14. Gherri E, Eimer M (2008) Links between eye movement preparation and the attentional processing of tactile events: an event-related brain potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 119:2587–2597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gherri E, Driver J, Eimer M (2008) Eye movement preparation causes spatially-specific modulation of auditory processing: new evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res 1224:88–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillmeister H, Adler J, Forster B (2010a) Object-based spatial attention in touch: holding the same object with both hands delays attentional selection. J Cogn Neurosci 22:931–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillmeister H, Sambo CF, Forster B (2010b) Which finger? Early effects of attentional selection within the hand are absent when the hand is viewed. Eur J Neurosci 31:1874–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hari R, Reinikainen K, Kaukoranta E, Hamalainen M, Ilmoniemi R, Penttinen A, Salminen J, Teszner D (1984) Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 57:254–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heed T, Röder B (2010) Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: evidence from event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 22:184–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heed T, Röder B (2011) The body in a multisensory world. In: Murray MM, Wallace MT (eds) Frontiers in the neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 557–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hötting K, Rösler F, Röder B (2003) Crossmodal and intermodal attention modulate event-related brain potentials to tactile and auditory stimuli. Exp Brain Res 148:26–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennett S, Taylor-Clarke M, Haggard P (2001) Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans. Curr Biol 11:1188–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kóbor I, Füredi L, Kovács G, Spence C, Vidnyánszky Z (2006) Back-to-front: improved tactile discrimination performance in the space you cannot see. Neurosci Lett 400:163–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michie PT (1984) Selective attention effects on somatosensory event-related potentials. Ann NY Acad Sci 425:250–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Michie PT, Bearpark HM, Crawford JM, Glue LCT (1987) The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. Psychophysiology 24:449–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mima T, Nagamine T, Nakamura K, Shibasaki H (1998) Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. J Neurophysiol 80:2215–2221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Praamstra P, Boutsen L, Humphreys GW (2005) Frontoparietal control of spatial attention and motor intention in human EEG. J Neurophysiol 94:764–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Röder B, Kusmierek A, Spence C, Schicke T (2007) Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4753–4758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Röder B, Föcker J, Hötting K, Spence C (2008) Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans. Eur J Neurosci 28:475–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sambo CF, Gillmeister H, Forster B (2009) Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch. Eur J Neurosci 30:143–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schubert R, Ritter P, Wüstenberg T, Preuschhof C, Curio G, Sommer W, Villringer A (2008) Spatial attention related SEP amplitude modulations covary with BOLD signal in S1—a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 18:2686–2700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shore DI, Gray K, Spry E, Spence C (2005) Spatial modulation of tactile temporal-order judgments. Perception 34:1251–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soto-Faraco S, Ronald A, Spence C (2004) Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception. Percept Psychophys 66:1077–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2000) Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1298–1319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamamoto S, Kitazawa S (2001) Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat Neurosci 4:759–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of EssexColchesterUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCity University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations