Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 215, Issue 3–4, pp 183–197 | Cite as

Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning

  • Hassan Rohbanfard
  • Luc Proteau
Research Article


Observation of an expert or novice model promotes the learning of a motor skill. In two experiments, we determined the effects of a mixed observation schedule (a combination of expert and novice models) on the learning of a sequential timing task. In Experiment 1, participants observed a novice, expert, or both novice and expert models. The results of retention/transfer tests revealed that all observation groups and a physical practice group learned the task and outperformed a control group. However, observing a novice model was not as effective as observing expert and mixed models. Importantly, a mixed schedule of novice and expert observation resulted in a more stable movement time and better generalization of the imposed relative timing pattern than observation of either a novice or expert model alone. In Experiment 2, we aimed to determine whether a certain type of novice performance (highly variable, with or without error reduction with practice) in a mixed observation schedule would improved motor learning. The observation groups performed as well as a physical practice group and significantly better than a control group. No significant difference was observed with the type of novice model used in a mixed schedule of observation. The results suggest that mixed observation provides an accurate template of the movement (expert observation) that is enhanced when contrasted with the performance of less successful models.


Observational learning Motor learning Action observation network Timing task 


  1. Adams JA (1986) Use of the model’s knowledge of results to increase the observer’s performance. J Hum Mov Stu 12(2):89–98Google Scholar
  2. Al-Abood SA, Davids K, Bennett SJ (2001) Specificity of task constraints and effects of visual demonstrations and verbal instructions in directing learners’ search during skill acquisition. J Mot Behav 33(3):295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badets A, Blandin Y, Wright DL, Shea CH (2006) Error detection processes during observational learning. Res Q Exercise Sport 77(2):177–184Google Scholar
  4. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates AT, Patel TP, Liddle PF (2005) External behavior monitoring mirrors internal behavior monitoring - Error-related negativity for observed errors. J Psychophysiol 19(4):281–288. doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird G, Heyes C (2005) Effector-dependent learning by observation of a finger movement sequence. J Exp Psychol Human 31(2):262–275. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black CB, Wright DL (2000) Can observational practice facilitate error recognition and movement production? Res Q Exercise Sport 71(4):331–339Google Scholar
  8. Blandin Y, Proteau L (2000) On the cognitive basis of observational learning: development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. Q J Exp Psychol-A 53(3):846–867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Blandin Y, Proteau L, Alain C (1994) On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. J Mot Behav 26(1):18–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blandin Y, Lhuisset L, Proteau L (1999) Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. Q J Exp Psychol-A 52(4):957–979Google Scholar
  11. Buchanan JJ, Dean NJ (2010) Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice. Psychol Res 74(3):313–326. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0254-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, … Freund HJ (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13(2):400–404Google Scholar
  13. Buchanan JJ, Ryu YU, Zihlman K, Wright DL (2008) Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task. Exp Brain Res 191:157–169. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1512-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll WR, Bandura A (1982) The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: making the unobservable observable. J Mot Behav 14(2):153–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cisek P, Kalaska JF (2004) Neural correlates of mental rehearsal in dorsal premotor cortex. Nature 431(7011):993–996. doi: 10.1038/nature03005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collier GL, Wright CE (1995) Temporal rescaling of simple and complex ratios in rhythmic tapping. J Exp Psychol Human 21(3):602–627. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cross ES, Schmitt PJ, Grafton ST (2007) Neural substrates of contextual interference during motor learning support a model of active preparation. J Cognitive Neurosci 19(11):1854–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cross ES, Kraemer DJM, Hamilton AFD, Kelley WM, Grafton ST (2009) Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cereb Cortex 19(2):315–326. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn083 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Decety J, Grezes J, Costes N, Perani D, Jeannerod M, Procyk E, … Fazio F (1997) Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain 120(Pt 10):1763–1777Google Scholar
  20. De Jaeger D, Proteau L (2003) The relative efficacy of different forms of knowledge of results for the learning of a new relative timing pattern. Q J Exp Psychol-A 56(4):621–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deakin JM, Proteau L (2000) The role of scheduling in learning through observation. J Mot Behav 32(3):268–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dushanova J, Donoghue J (2010) Neurons in primary motor cortex engaged during action observation. Eur J Neurosci 31(2):386–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.07067.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrari M (1996) Observing the observer: self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Dev Rev 16(2):203–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frey SH, Gerry VE (2006) Modulation of neural activity during observational learning of actions and their sequential orders. J Neurosci 26(51):13194–13201. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3914-06.2006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallese V, Fogassi L, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (2002) Action representation and the inferior parietal lobule. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Common mechanisms in perception and action: attention & performance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 247–266Google Scholar
  26. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Promotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6(4):231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S (1959) On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24:95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes SJ, Elliott D, Bennett SJ (2010) General motor representations are developed during action-observation. Exp Brain Res 204(2):199–206. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2303-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyes CM, Foster CL (2002) Motor learning by observation: evidence from a serial reaction time task. Q J Exp Psychol-A 55(2):593–607. doi: 10.1080/02724980143000389 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodges NJ, Chua R, Franks IM (2003) The role of video in facilitating perception and action of a novel coordination movement. J Mot Behav 35(3):247–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodges NJ, Williams AM, Hayes SJ, Breslin G (2007) What is modelled during observational learning? J Sports Sci 25(5):531–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee TD, White MA (1990) Influence of an unskilled model’s practice schedule on observational motor learning. Hum Movement Sci 9(3–5):349–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien DJ (1994) Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 46(3):328–344Google Scholar
  34. Lin CH, Fisher BE, Winstein CJ, Wu AD, Gordon J (2008) Contextual interference effect: elaborative processing or forgetting-reconstruction? A post hoc analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced effects on motor learning. J Mot Behav 40(6):578–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin CH, Fisher BE, Wu AD, Ko YA, Lee LY, Winstein CJ (2009) Neural correlate of the contextual interference effect in motor learning: a kinematic analysis. J Mot Behav 41(3):232–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin CH, Winstein CJ, Fisher BE, Wu AD (2010) Neural correlates of the contextual interference effect in motor learning: a transcranial magnetic stimulation investigation. J Mot Behav 42(4):223–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martens R, Burwitz L, Zuckerman J (1976) Modeling effects on motor performance. Res Q 47(2):277–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mattar AAG, Gribble PL (2005) Motor learning by observing. Neuron 46(1):153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCullagh P, Caird JK (1990) Correct and learning models and the use of the model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. J Hum Mov Stud 18(3):107–116Google Scholar
  40. McCullagh P, Meyer KN (1997) Learning versus correct models: influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Res Q Exercise Sport 68(1):56–61Google Scholar
  41. McCullagh P, Weiss MR, Ross D (1989) Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: an integrated approach. Exercise Sport Sci R 17:475–513Google Scholar
  42. Miltner WHR, Brauer J, Hecht H, Trippe R, Coles MGH (2004) Parallel brain activity for self-generated and observed errors. In: Ullsperger M, Falkenstein M (eds) Errors, conflicts, and the brain: current opinions on performance monitoring. MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, pp 124–129Google Scholar
  43. Pollock BJ, Lee TD (1992) Effects of the model’s skill level on observational motor learning. Res Q Exercise Sport 63(1):25–29Google Scholar
  44. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA (1992) New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol Sci 3(4):207–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  46. Scully DM, Newell KM (1985) Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: toward a visual perception perspective. J Hum Movement Stud 11(4):169–186Google Scholar
  47. Shane MS, Stevens M, Harenski CL, Kiehl KA (2008) Neural correlates of the processing of another’s mistakes: a possible underpinning for social and observational learning. Neuroimage 42(1):450–459. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.067 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shea CH, Wright DL, Wulf G, Whitacre C (2000) Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. J Mot Behav 32(1):27–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheffield FN (1961) Theoretical consideration in the learning of complex sequential task from demonstration and practice. In: Lumsdaine AA (ed) Student response in programmed instruction. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  50. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  51. Trempe M, Sabourin M, Rohbanfard H, Proteau L (2011) Observation learning versus physical practice leads to different consolidation outcomes in a movement timing task. Exp Brain Res 209(2):181–192. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2540-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Schie HT, Mars RB, Coles MGH, Bekkering H (2004) Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation. Nat Neurosci 7(5):549–554. doi: 10.1038/nn1239 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vogt S, Thomaschke R (2007) From visuo-motor interactions to imitation learning: Behavioural and brain imaging studies. J Sports Sci 25(5):497–517. doi: 10.1080/02640410600946779 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weeks DL, Anderson LP (2000) The interaction of observational learning with overt practice: effects on motor skill learning. Acta Psychol Amst 104(2):259–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weir PL, Leavitt JL (1990) The effects of model’s skill level and model’s knowledge of results on the acquisition of an aiming task. Hum Movement Sci 9(3–5):369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wulf G, Mornell A (2008) Insights about practice from the perspective of motor learning: a review. Music Perform Res 2:1–25Google Scholar
  57. Wymbs NF, Grafton ST (2009) Neural substrates of practice structure that support future off-line learning. J Neurophysiol 102(4):2462–2476. doi: 10.1152/jn.00315.2009 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de kinésiologieUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations