Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 213, Issue 2–3, pp 321–327 | Cite as

Sustained selective intermodal attention modulates processing of language-like stimuli

  • Christian Keitel
  • Erich Schröger
  • Katja Saupe
  • Matthias M. Müller
Research Article

Abstract

Intermodal attention (IA) is assumed to allocate limited neural processing resources to input from one specific sensory modality. We investigated effects of sustained IA on the amplitude of a 40-Hz auditory (ASSR) and a 4.3-Hz visual steady-state response (VSSR). To this end, we concurrently presented amplitude-modulated multi-speech babble and a stream of nonsense letter sets to elicit the respective brain responses. Subjects were cued trialwise to selectively attend to one of the streams for several seconds where they had to perform a lexical decision task on occasionally occurring words and pseudowords. Attention to the auditory stream led to greater ASSR amplitudes than attention to the visual stream. Vice versa, the VSSR amplitude was greater when the visual stream was attended. We demonstrate that IA research by means of frequency tagging can be extended to complex stimuli as used in the current study. Furthermore, we show not only that IA selectively modulates processing of concurrent multisensory input but that this modulation occurs during trial-by-trial cueing of IA. The use of frequency tagging may be suitable to study the role of IA in more naturalistic setups that comprise a larger number of multisensory signals.

Keywords

Human EEG Intermodal attention Sustained attention VSSR ASSR Speech 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Renate Zahn for help in data recording. Special thanks to Andreas Widmann for technical support. Further thanks to Anne Melzer, Philipp Ruhnau and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript. This experiment was realised using Cogent 2000 developed by the Cogent 2000 team at the FIL and the ICN and Cogent Graphics developed by John Romaya at the LON at the Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience. Work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, graduate programme “Function of Attention in Cognition” (GRK 1182).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  1. Alho K, Woods DL, Algazi A, Naatanen R (1992) Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:356–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alho K, Woods DL, Algazi A (1994) Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 31:469–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsius A, Navarra J, Campbell R, Soto-Faraco S (2005) Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Curr Biol 15:839–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alsius A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S (2007) Attention to touch weakens audiovisual speech integration. Exp Brain Res 183:399–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen SK, Fuchs S, Müller MM (2011) Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing. J Cogn Neurosci 23:238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman RA, Colby CL (2002) Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14:64–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bidet-Caulet A, Fischer C, Besle J, Aguera PE, Giard MH, Bertrand O (2007) Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27:9252–9261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvert GA, Thesen T (2004) Multisensory integration: methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. J Physiol Paris 98:191–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Jong R, Toffanin P, Harbers M (2010) Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention. Int J Psychophysiol 75:3–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Ruiter MB, Kok A, van der Schoot M (1998) Effects of inter- and intramodal selective attention to non-spatial visual stimuli: an event-related potential analysis. Biol Psychol 49:269–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eimer M, Schröger E (1998) ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology 35:313–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gander PE, Bosnyak DJ, Roberts LE (2010) Evidence for modality-specific but not frequency-specific modulation of human primary auditory cortex by attention. Hear Res 268:213–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghatan PH, Hsieh JC, Petersson KM, Stone-Elander S, Ingvar M (1998) Coexistence of attention-based facilitation and inhibition in the human cortex. Neuroimage 7:23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grady CL, Van Meter JW, Maisog JM, Pietrini P, Krasuski J, Rauschecker JP (1997) Attention-related modulation of activity in primary and secondary auditory cortex. Neuroreport 8:2511–2516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griskova I, Morup M, Parnas J, Ruksenas O, Arnfred SM (2007) The amplitude and phase precision of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal. Exp Brain Res 183:133–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutschalk A, Mase R, Roth R, Ille N, Rupp A, Hahnel S, Picton TW, Scherg M (1999) Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 110:856–868PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson JA, Zatorre RJ (2005) Attention to simultaneous unrelated auditory and visual events: behavioral and neural correlates. Cereb Cortex 15:1609–1620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Rockstroh B (2000) Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 37:523–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koelewijn T, Bronkhorst A, Theeuwes J (2010) Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: a review of audiovisual studies. Acta Psychol 134:372–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lakatos P, O’Connell MN, Barczak A, Mills A, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE (2009) The leading sense: supramodal control of neurophysiological context by attention. Neuron 64:419–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linden RD, Picton TW, Hamel G, Campbell KB (1987) Human auditory steady-state evoked potentials during selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66:145–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macmillan NA, Creelman DC (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  24. Morgan ST, Hansen JC, Hillyard SA (1996) Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4770–4774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Müller MM, Teder-Salejarvi W, Hillyard SA (1998) The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention. Nat Neurosci 1:631–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Müller N, Schlee W, Hartmann T, Lorenz I, Weisz N (2009) Top-down modulation of the auditory steady-state response in a task-switch paradigm. Front Hum Neurosci 3:1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muller-Gass A, Roye A, Kirmse U, Saupe K, Jacobsen T, Schroger E (2007) Automatic detection of lexical change: an auditory event-related potential study. Neuroreport 18:1747–1751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Näätänen R, Alho K, Schröger E (2002) Electrophysiology of attention. In: Pashler H, Wixted J (eds) Steven’s handbook of experimental psychology: methodology in experimental psychology, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 601–653Google Scholar
  29. Oostenveld R, Praamstra P (2001) The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements. Clin Neurophysiol 112:713–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quigley C, Andersen SK, Schulze L, Grunwald M, Müller MM (2010) Feature-selective attention: evidence for a decline in old age. Neurosci Lett 474:5–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Regan D (1989) Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Rohrbaugh JW, Varner JL, Paige SR, Eckardt MJ, Ellingson RJ (1990) Auditory and visual event-related perturbations in the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:148–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross B, Picton TW, Herdman AT, Pantev C (2004) The effect of attention on the auditory steady-state response. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol 2004:22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Saupe K, Widmann A, Bendixen A, Müller MM, Schröger E (2009a) Effects of intermodal attention on the auditory steady-state response and the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 46:321–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saupe K, Schröger E, Andersen SK, Müller MM (2009b) Neural mechanisms of intermodal sustained selective attention with concurrently presented auditory and visual stimuli. Front Hum Neurosci 3:58Google Scholar
  36. Senkowski D, Saint-Amour D, Gruber T, Foxe JJ (2008) Look who’s talking: the deployment of visuo-spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions. Neuroimage 43:379–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shomstein S, Yantis S (2004) Control of attention shifts between vision and audition in human cortex. J Neurosci 24:10702–10706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skosnik PD, Krishnan GP, O’Donnell BF (2007) The effect of selective attention on the gamma-band auditory steady-state response. Neurosci Lett 420:223–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Talsma D, Kok A (2001) Nonspatial intermodal selective attention is mediated by sensory brain areas: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 38:736–751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Talsma D, Kok A (2002) Intermodal spatial attention differs between vision and audition: an event-related potential analysis. Psychophysiology 39:689–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Talsma D, Doty TJ, Strowd R, Woldorff MG (2006) Attentional capacity for processing concurrent stimuli is larger across sensory modalities than within a modality. Psychophysiology 43:541–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Talsma D, Senkowski D, Soto-Faraco S, Woldorff MG (2010) The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends Cogn Sci 14:400–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toffanin P, de Jong R, Johnson A, Martens S (2009) Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. Int J Psychophysiol 72:289–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Töllner T, Gramann K, Müller HJ, Kiss M, Eimer M (2008) Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:531–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woods DL, Alho K, Algazi A (1992) Intermodal selective attention. I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:341–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Keitel
    • 1
  • Erich Schröger
    • 1
  • Katja Saupe
    • 1
  • Matthias M. Müller
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für PsychologieUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations