Invariance of locomotor trajectories across visual and gait direction conditions
Abstract
We studied the influence of vision (walking with or without vision) and of gait direction (walking forward or backward) on goal-oriented locomotion in humans. Subjects had to walk, in a free environment, from a given position and orientation towards a distant arrow which constrained their final position and orientation. We found that the average trajectories were mostly similar across the tested conditions, which suggests that locomotor trajectories are generated at a high cognitive level and, to some extent, independently of the detailed sensory and motor implementation levels. The variability profiles around the average trajectories were similar across the gait direction conditions but differed greatly across the visual conditions, indicating the existence of motor-independent and vision-dependent control mechanisms. Taken together, our observations argue further in favour of a top-down implementation of goal-oriented locomotion, where the control of locomotion is specified at the level of whole-body trajectories and then implemented through specific motor strategies.
Keywords
Human locomotion Vision Backward walking Invariance Locomotor trajectoriesAbbreviations
- CNS
Central nervous system
- VF
Vision forward
- NF
No-vision forward
- VB
Vision backward
- NB
No-vision backward
- TD
Trajectory deviation
- MTD
Maximum trajectory deviation
- VD
Velocity deviation
- TS
Trajectory separation
- MTS
Maximum trajectory separation
- TL
Trajectory length
Notes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the ANR PsiRob Locanthrope project and by a grant from Région Île-de-France. HH was supported in part by a fellowship award from the Alexander von Humboldt foundation. We would like to thank Daniel Bennequin for interesting discussions, Anne-Hélène Olivier and Armel Crétual for technical assistance and suggestions during the experiments and France Maloumian for her help in editing the figures.
References
- Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bennequin D, Fuchs R, Berthoz A, Flash T (2009) Movement timing and invariance arise from several geometries. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000426
- Grasso R, Bianchi L, Lacquaniti F (1998a) Motor patterns for human gait: backward versus forward locomotion. J Neurophysiol 80:1868–1885PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grasso R, Prévost P, Ivanenko YP, Berthoz A (1998b) Eye-head coordination for the steering of locomotion in humans: an anticipatory synergy. Neurosci Lett 253:115–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hicheur H, Pham QC, Arechavaleta G, Laumond JP, Berthoz A (2007) The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. I. A stereotyped behaviour. Eur J Neurosci 26:2376–2390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jahn K, Deutschländer A, Stephan T, Strupp M, Wiesmann M, Brandt T (2004) Brain activation patterns during imagined stance and locomotion in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 22:1722–1731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lappe M, Bremmer F, van den Berg AV (1999) Perception of self-motion from visual flow. Trends Cogn Sci 3:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loomis JM, Da Silva JA, Fujita N, Fukusima SS (1992) Visual space perception and visually directed action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:906–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Cicinelli JG, Pellegrino JW, Fry PA (1993) Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:73–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Patla AE, Prentice SD, Rietdyk S, Allard F, Martin C (1999) What guides the selection of alternate foot placement during locomotion in humans. Exp Brain Res 128:441–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pham QC, Hicheur H (2009) On the open-loop and feedback processes that underlie the formation of trajectories during visual and nonvisual locomotion in humans. J Neurophysiol 102:2800–2815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pham QC, Hicheur H, Arechavaleta G, Laumond JP, Berthoz A (2007) The formation of trajectories during goal-oriented locomotion in humans. II. A maximum smoothness model. Eur J Neurosci 26:2391–2403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rushton SK, Harris JM, Lloyd MR, Wann JP (1998) Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Curr Biol 8:1191–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Steck K, Wittlinger M, Wolf H (2009) Estimation of homing distance in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, remains unaffected by disturbance of walking behaviour. J Exp Biol 212:2893–2901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Takei Y, Grasso R, Amorim MA, Berthoz A (1997) Circular trajectory formation during blind locomotion: a test for path integration and motor memory. Exp Brain Res 115:361–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thomson JA (1983) Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9:427–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thorstensson A (1986) How is the normal locomotor program modified to produce backward walking? Exp Brain Res 61:664–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Warren WH Jr, Kay BA, Zosh WD, Duchon AP, Sahuc S (2001) Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nat Neurosci 4:213–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar