Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 209, Issue 3, pp 415–423

The oculogyral illusion: retinal and oculomotor factors

  • Jerome Carriot
  • A. Bryan
  • P. DiZio
  • J. R. Lackner
Research Article

Abstract

Subjects in a dark chamber exposed to angular acceleration while viewing a head-fixed target experience motion and displacement of the target relative to their body. Competing explanations of this phenomenon, known as the oculogyral illusion, have attributed it to the suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) or to retinal slip. In the dark, the VOR evokes compensatory eye movements in the direction opposite to body acceleration. A head-fixed visual target will tend to suppress these eye movements. The VOR suppression hypothesis attributes the oculogyral illusion to the signals that prevent reflexive deviation of the eyes from the target thus resulting in apparent target displacement in the direction of acceleration. The retinal slip hypothesis attributes the illusion to inadequate fixation of the target with the eyes being involuntarily deviated in the direction opposite acceleration, the retinal slip being interpreted as target displacement in the direction of acceleration. Another possibility is that the illusion could arise from a change in the representation of the perceived head midline. To evaluate these three alternative hypotheses, we tested 8 subjects at 4 acceleration rates (2, 10, 20, 30°/s²) in each of three conditions: (a) fixate and point to a target light; (b) fixate to the target light and point to the head midline; (c) look straight ahead in the dark. The displacement magnitude of the oculogyral illusion was least at 2°/s² ≈ 2° and was ≈10° at the other acceleration rates. The presence of the target light significantly attenuated eye movements relative to the dark condition, but eye movements were still present at the 10, 20, and 30°/s² accelerations. The eye velocity profiles in the dark at different acceleration rates did not show a one-to-one inverse mapping to the magnitude of the oculogyral illusion at those rates. The perceived head midline was not significantly displaced at any of the acceleration rates. The oculogyral illusion thus has at least two contributing factors: the suppression of nystagmus at low acceleration rates and at higher acceleration rates, a partial suppression coupled with an integration of the drift of the eyes with respect to the fixation target.

Keywords

Angular acceleration Oculogyral illusion VOR cancelation Retinal slip Eye slow phase velocity Vestibular 

References

  1. Angelaki DE, Klier EM, Snyder LH (2009) A vestibular sensation: probabilistic approaches to spatial perception. Neuron 64:448–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker JT, Harper TM, Snyder LH (2003) Spatial memory following shifts of gaze. I. Saccades to memorized world-fixed and gaze-fixed targets. J Neurophysiol 89:2564–2576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes GR (1988) Head-eye co-ordination: visual and nonvisual mechanisms of vestibulo-ocular reflex slow-phase modification. Prog Brain Res 76:319–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes GR, Eason RD (1988) Effects of visual and non-visual mechanisms on the vestibulo-ocular reflex during pseudo-random head movements in man. J Physiol 395:383–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloomberg J, Jones GM, Segal B, McFarlane S, Soul J (1988) Vestibular-contingent voluntary saccades based on cognitive estimates of remembered vestibular information. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 41:71–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloomberg J, Melvill Jones G, Segal B (1991) Adaptive plasticity in the gaze stabilizing synergy of slow and saccadic eye movements. Exp Brain Res 84:35–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blouin J, Gauthier GM, van Donkelaar P, Vercher JL (1995a) Encoding the position of a flashed visual target after passive body rotations. Neuroreport 30:1165–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blouin J, Gauthier GM, Vercher JL (1995b) Failure to update the egocentric representation of the visual space through labyrinthine signal. Brain Cogn 29:1–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blouin J, Gauthier GM, Vercher JL (1997) Visual object localization through vestibular and neck inputs. 2: updating off-mid-sagittal-plane target positions. J Vestib Res 7:137–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown RH, Imus H, Niven JI, Graybiel A (1949) The relationship between apparent displacement and motion in the oculogyral illusion. In: Mann CW, Kellum WE (eds) Research report. US Naval School of Aviation Medicine with Tulane University, Pensacola, FL, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  11. Ceyte H, Cian C, Nougier V, Olivier I, Trousselard M (2007) Role of gravity-based information on the orientation and localization of the perceived body midline. Exp Brain Res 176:504–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chowdhury SA, Takahashi K, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2009) Does the middle temporal area carry vestibular signals related to self-motion? J Neurosci 29:12020–12030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark B, Graybiel A (1949) The effect of angular acceleration on sound localization (The audiogyral illusion). J Psychol 28:235–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark B, Stewart JD (1969) Effects of angular acceleration on man: thresholds for the perception of rotation and the oculogyral illusion. Aerosp Med 40:952–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cullen KE, Rey CG, Guitton D, Galiana HL (1996) The use of system identification techniques in the analysis of oculomotor burst neuron spike traindynamic. J Comput Neurosci 3:347–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fluur E, Mendel L, Lagerström L (1966) Reproducibility of duration of latency time in unidirectional per-rotatory nystagmus. Acta Otolaryngol 62:118–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Graybiel A, Hupp DI (1946) The oculogyral illusion. A form of apparent motion which may be observed following stimulation of the semicircular canals. Aviat Med 17:3–27Google Scholar
  18. Graybiel A, Clark B, MacCorquodale K, Hupp DI (1946) Role of vestibular nystagmus in the visual perception of a moving target in the dark. Am J Psychol 59:259–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graybiel A, Kerr WA, Bartley SH (1948) Stimulus thresholds of the semi-circular canals as a function of angular acceleration. Am J Psychol 61:21–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guedry FE Jr (1965) Psychophysiological studies of vestibular function. Contrib Sens Physiol 14:63–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Israël I, André-Deshays C, Charade O, Berthoz A, Popov K, Lipshits M (1993) Gaze control in microgravity. 2. Sequences of saccades toward memorized visual targets. J Vestib Res 3:345–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Karnath HO, Reich E, Rorden C, Fetter M, Driver J (2002) The perception of body orientation after neck-proprioceptive stimulation. Effects of time and of visual cueing. Exp Brain Res 143:350–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lackner JR, DiZio P (2010) Audiogravic and oculogravic illusions represent a unified spatial remapping. Exp Brain Res 202:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lackner JR, Levine MS (1979) Changes in apparent body orientation and sensory localization induced by vibration of postural muscles: vibratory myesthetic illusions. Aviat Space Environ Med 50:346–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lester G, Morant RB (1969) The role of felt position of the head in the audiogyral illusion. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 31:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prieur JM, Bourdin C, Vercher JL, Sares F, Blouin J, Gauthier GM (2005) Accuracy of spatial localization depending on head posture in a perturbed gravitoinertial force field. Exp Brain Res 161:432–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quarck G, Lhuisset L, Etard O, Denise P (2009) Eye eccentricity modifies the perception of whole-body rotation. Exp Brain Res 196:295–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath HO, Keller I, Goldenberg G (2002) Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:412–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seemungal BM, Gunaratne IA, Fleming IO, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM (2004) Perceptual and nystagmic thresholds of vestibular function in yaw. J Vestib Res 14:461–466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Seizova-Cajic T, Sachtler WL (2007) Adaptation of a bimodal integration stage: visual input needed during neck muscle vibration to elicit a motion aftereffect. Exp Brain Res 181:117–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seizova-Cajic T, Sachtler WL, Curthoys IS (2006) Eye movements cannot explain vibration-induced visual motion and motion aftereffect. Exp Brain Res 173:141–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takahashi K, Gu Y, May PJ, Newlands SD, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2007) Multimodal coding of three-dimensional rotation and translation in area MSTd: comparison of visual and vestibular selectivity. J Neurosci 27:9742–9756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor JL, McCloskey DI (1991) Illusions of head and visual target displacement induced by vibration of neck muscles. Brain 114(Pt 2):755–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whiteside TCD, Graybiel A, Niven JI (1965) Visual illusions of movement. Brain 88:193–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerome Carriot
    • 1
  • A. Bryan
    • 1
  • P. DiZio
    • 1
  • J. R. Lackner
    • 1
  1. 1.Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, MS 033Brandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations