Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 208, Issue 4, pp 529–532 | Cite as

Distractor frequency influences performance in vibrotactile working memory

  • Tyler Bancroft
  • Philip ServosEmail author
Research Article


We use a vibrotactile-delayed match-to-sample paradigm to evaluate the effects of interference on working memory. One of the suggested mechanisms through which interference affects performance in working memory is feature overwriting: Short-term representations are maintained in a finite set of feature units (such as prefrontal neurons), and distractor stimuli co-opt some or all of those units, degrading the stored representation of an earlier stimulus. Subjects were presented with two vibrotactile stimuli and were instructed to determine whether they were of the same or different frequencies. A distractor stimulus was presented between the target and probe stimuli, the frequency of which was a function of the target stimulus. Performance on the task was affected by the frequency of the distractor, with subjects making more erroneous same judgments on different trials when the distractor frequency was closer to the probe than to the target, than when the distractor was further from the probe than the target. The results suggest that the frequency of the distractor partially overwrites the stored frequency information of the probe stimulus, providing support for the feature-overwriting explanation of working memory interference.


Tactile working memory Vibrotactile perception Interference Frequency 



This work was supported by the Canada Research Chairs program (PS) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PS). We thank William Hockley and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments. We thank Wendell Prime for technical assistance.


  1. Graham SJ, Staines WR, Nelson A, Plewes DB, McIlroy WE (2001) New devices to deliver somatosensory stimuli during functional MRI. Mag Res Med 46:436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Haegens S, Osipova D, Oostenveld R, Jensen O (2010) Somatosensory working memory performance in humans depends on both engagement and disengagement of regions in a distributed network. Hum Brain Map 31:26–35Google Scholar
  3. Harris JA, Harris IM, Diamond ME (2001) The topography of tactile working memory. J Neurosci 21:8262–8269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Harris JA, Miniussi C, Harris IM, Diamond ME (2002) Transient storage of a tactile working memory trace in primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 22:8720–8725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Harris JA, Arabzadeh E, Fairhall AL, Benito C, Diamond ME (2006) Factors affecting frequency discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli: implications for cortical encoding. PLoS One 1:e100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000100 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hernandez A, Zainos A, Romo R (2000) Neuronal correlates of sensory discrimination in the somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:6191–6196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mercer T, McKeown D (2010) Interference in short-term auditory memory. Q J Exp Psych 63:1256–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nairne J (1990) A feature model of immediate memory. Mem & Cog 18:251–269Google Scholar
  9. Oberauer K (2009) Interference between storage and processing in working memory: feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition. Mem & Cog 37:346–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Oberauer K, Kliegl R (2006) A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. J Mem & Lang 55:601–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Postle B (2006) Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience 139:23–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Romo R, Brody C, Hernandez A, Lemus L (1999) Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex. Nature 399:470–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Lemus L, Brody C (2002) Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 5:1217–1225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Singh R, Eliasmith C (2006) Higher-dimensional neurons explain the tuning and dynamics of working memory cells. J Neurosci 26:3667–3678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sörös P, Marmurek J, Tam F, Baker N, Staines WR, Graham SJ (2007) Functional MRI of working memory and selective attention in vibrotactile frequency discrimination. BMC Neurosci 8:48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Spitzer B, Wacker E, Blankenburg F (2010) Oscillatory correlates of vibrotactile frequency processing in human working memory. J Neurosci 30:4496–4502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhou Y, Fuster J (1996) Mnemonic neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:10533–10537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations