The sense of touch is believed to provide a reliable perception of the object’s properties; however, our tactile perceptions could be illusory at times. A recently reported tactile illusion shows that a raised form can be perceived as indented when it is surrounded by textured areas. This phenomenon suggests that the form perception can be influenced by the surface textures in its adjacent areas. As perception of texture and that of form have been studied independently of each other, the present study examined whether textures, in addition to the geometric edges, contribute to the tactile form perception. We examined the perception of the flat and raised contact surface (3.0 mm width) with various heights (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 mm), which had either textured or non-textured adjacent areas, under the static, passive and active touch conditions. Our results showed that texture decreased the raised perception of the surface with a small height (0.1 mm) and decreased the flat perception of the physically flat surface under the passive and active touch conditions. We discuss a possible mechanism underlying the effect of the textures on the form perception based on previous neurophysiological findings.
Tactile perception Tactile illusion Fingerpad Shape perception Geometric form perception
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We would like to thank Ai Koizumi for her comments on the earlier drafts. The authors also thank María Oyarzábal, Christopher R. Wagner, Ryan A. Beasley and Douglas P. Perrin for their insightful discussions.
Bhushan B (2002) Introduction to tribology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Blake R, Sekuler R (2006) Perception. McGraw Hill Higher Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Blake DT, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO (1997) Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness. J Neurosci 17:7480–7489PubMedGoogle Scholar
Connor CE, Johnson KO (1992) Neural coding of tactile texture: comparison of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception. J Neurosci 12:3414–3426PubMedGoogle Scholar
Connor CE, Hsiao SS, Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1990) Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates. J Neurosci 10:3823–3826PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hayward V, Cruz-Hernandez M (2000) Tactile display device using distributed lateral skin stretch. In Proc. of the Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environ and Teleop Sys Symp DSC-69-2: 1309–1314Google Scholar
Hollins M, Risner SR (2000) Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept Psychophys 62:695–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson KO, Hsiao SS (1992) Neural mechanisms of tactual form and texture perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 15:227–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson KO, Phillips JR (1981) Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol 46:1177–1192PubMedGoogle Scholar
Johnson KO, Yoshioka T, Vega–Bermudez F (2000) Tactile functions of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the hand. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:539–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatzky RL, Lederman SJ (1993) Toward a computational model of constraint-driven exploration and haptic object identification. Percept 22:597–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederman SJ, Taylor MM (1972) Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch. Percep & Psychophys 12:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyaoka T, Mano T, Ohka M (1999) Mechanisms of fine-surface-texture discrimination in human tactile sensation. J Acoust Soc Am 105:2485–2492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakatani M, Howe RD, Tachi S (2006) The Fishbone Tactile Illusion. Proc of Eurohaptics 69–73Google Scholar
Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981) Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 46:1192–1203PubMedGoogle Scholar