Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 207, Issue 1–2, pp 65–73 | Cite as

Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults

  • Valerie E. Kelly
  • Alexis A. Janke
  • Anne Shumway-Cook
Research Article

Abstract

Dual task paradigms can be used to examine the interactions between cognition and the control of posture and gait. Measuring and interpreting changes in dual task performance is challenging, however, because many factors can influence performance. This study examined the effects of instructed focus and walking task difficulty, and the interaction between these factors, on dual task performance in healthy young adults. Fifteen participants performed a cognitive task while walking with either a usual base or a narrow base of support. Participants were instructed to focus on either the cognitive task or walking. Trade-offs both within and between tasks were assessed using the modified attention allocation index and the performance operating characteristic. Instructed focus influenced both the cognitive task and walking. Performance on the cognitive task was faster with instructions to focus on the cognitive task, and walking was faster (and more accurate in the narrow-base condition) with instructions to focus on walking. Walking task difficulty did not affect cognitive performance but did affect walking, with faster walking in the usual-base versus narrow-base condition. There was evidence of an interaction, with greater effects of instructed focus on the cognitive task during usual versus narrow-base walking. These results support the idea that the ability to flexibly shift attention allocation and task performance in response to instructions depends on the difficulty of the postural control task. The modified attention allocation index and the performance operating characteristic were instrumental in fully characterizing trade-offs between and within tasks in order to understand dual task performance changes. A clearer understanding of the factors that affect dual task walking and the interactions between these factors has important implications for the assessment of dual task performance in both clinical and research settings.

Keywords

Attention Instructional set Dual task Gait Narrow-base walking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the University of Washington Stolov Research Fund and the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD052018). We thank R. Price for engineering support and L. Flexner for recording the stimuli. We thank A. Schang, R. Hashish, J. Eastman, A. Nowak, A. Fish, S. Sirois, S. Woldemariam, and A. Gillespie for assistance with data collection and analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brach JS, Berlin JE, VanSwearingen JM, Newman AB, Studenski SA (2005) Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2:21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown LA, Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (1999) Attentional demands and postural recovery: the effects of aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 54:M165–M171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown LA, McKenzie NC, Doan JB (2005) Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:924–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraizer EV, Mitra S (2008) Methodological and interpretive issues in posture-cognition dual-tasking in upright stance. Gait Posture 27:271–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gage WH, Sleik RJ, Polych MA, McKenzie NC, Brown LA (2003) The allocation of attention during locomotion is altered by anxiety. Exp Brain Res 150:385–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hausdorff JM, Edelberg HK, Mitchell SL, Goldberger AL, Wei JY (1997) Increased gait unsteadiness in community-dwelling elderly fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:278–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huxhold O, Li SC, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U (2006) Dual-tasking postural control: aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention. Brain Res Bull 69:294–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelly VE, Schrager MA, Price R, Ferrucci L, Shumway-Cook A (2008) Age-associated effects of a concurrent cognitive task on gait speed and stability during narrow-base walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1329–1334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA (1985) Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:617–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M (1993) Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 97:139–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M (1996) Upright standing and gait: are there changes in attentional requirements related to normal aging? Exp Aging Res 22:185–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morgan AL, Brandt JF (1989) An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time. Brain Lang 36:592–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Norman DA, Bobrow DG (1975) Data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cogn Psychol 7:44–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rapp MA, Krampe RT, Baltes PB (2006) Adaptive task prioritization in aging: selective resource allocation to postural control is preserved in Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14:52–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M (2000) Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M10–M16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M (1997) The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52:M232–M240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Siu KC, Woollacott MH (2007) Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources. Gait Posture 25:121–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Siu KC, Chou LS, Mayr U, Donkelaar P, Woollacott MH (2008) Does inability to allocate attention contribute to balance constraints during gait in older adults? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 63:1364–1369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sperling G, Melchner MJ (1978) The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search. Science 202:315–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 16:1–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Woollacott M, Vander Velde T (2008) Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control. Brain Res 1208:95–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N (2008) The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord 23:329–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yogev-Seligmann G, Rotem-Galili Y, Mirelman A, Dickstein R, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM (2010) How does explicit prioritization alter walking during dual-task performance? Effects of age and sex on gait speed and variability. Phys Ther 90:177–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerie E. Kelly
    • 1
  • Alexis A. Janke
    • 1
  • Anne Shumway-Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations