Functional reorganization of upper-body movement after spinal cord injury
- 346 Downloads
Survivors of spinal cord injury need to reorganize their residual body movements for interacting with assistive devices and performing activities that used to be easy and natural. To investigate movement reorganization, we asked subjects with high-level spinal cord injury (SCI) and unimpaired subjects to control a cursor on a screen by performing upper-body motions. While this task would be normally accomplished by operating a computer mouse, here shoulder motions were mapped into the cursor position. Both the control and the SCI subjects were rapidly able to reorganize their movements and to successfully control the cursor. The majority of the subjects in both groups were successful in reducing the movements that were not effective at producing cursor motions. This is inconsistent with the hypothesis that the control system is merely concerned with the accurate acquisition of the targets and is unconcerned with motions that are not relevant to this goal. In contrast, our findings suggest that subjects can learn to reorganize coordination so as to increase the correspondence between the subspace of their upper-body motions with the plane in which the controlled cursor moves. This is effectively equivalent to constructing an inverse internal model of the map from body motions to cursor motions, established by the experiment. These results are relevant to the development of interfaces for assistive devices that optimize the use of residual voluntary control and enhance the learning process in disabled users, searching for an easily learnable map between their body motor space and control space of the device.
KeywordsSpinal cord injury Reorganization of movement Motor learning Human–machine interface
This work was supported by NINDS grants 1R21HD053608 and 1R01NS053581-01A2, by the Neilsen Foundation and by the Brinson Foundation.
- Baillieul J (1985) Kinematic programming alternatives for redundant manipulators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 722–728Google Scholar
- Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movement. Pegammon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Fouad K, Krajacic A et al. (2010) Spinal cord injury and plasticity: opportunities and challenges. Brain Res BullGoogle Scholar
- Gandhi MV, Thompson BS (1992) Smart materials and structures. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kaye HS, Kang T et al (2000) Mobility device use in the United States. Disability statistics report. N. 14. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Klein CA, Huang CH (1983) Review of pseudoinverse control for use with kinematically redundant manipulators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-13:245–250Google Scholar
- Nudo RJ, Friel KM (1999) Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris) 155(9):713–717Google Scholar