Sensory-motor equivalence: manual aiming in C6 tetraplegics following musculotendinous transfer surgery at the elbow
- 132 Downloads
Cervical spinal lesions at C6 result in paralysis of the triceps brachii while leaving deltoid and elbow flexor function intact. We examined the spatial–temporal characteristics of goal-directed aiming movements performed by C6 tetraplegics who had undergone musculotendinous transfer surgery in which the posterior deltoid replaces the triceps as the elbow extensor. On some trials, liquid crystal goggles were used to eliminate vision of the limb and target upon movement initiation. Although tetraplegic participants achieved the same degree of movement accuracy/consistency as control participants, their movement times were longer regardless of whether the movements were made away from (elbow extension) or towards the body (elbow flexion). Longer movement times were related to lower peak velocities, and not the symmetry of the aiming profiles. The tetraplegic participants were no more dependent on visual feedback for limb regulation than control participants. Although the characteristics of the movement trajectories were surprisingly similar, in both vision conditions, tetraplegics required more real and proportional time to reduce spatial variability in the limb’s trajectory for elbow extensions. Our results indicate that the sensorimotor system is adaptable and that the representations governing limb control are not muscle specific.
KeywordsEffector independence Motor equivalence Tetraplegia Tendon transfer Aiming Vision Motor control Kinematics
This work was supported by the Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences at Liverpool John Moores University, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors wish to express their thanks to Mrs. Barbara Hoole and Mr. Pradip Sett of the North West Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust for their assistance with the recruitment of participants.
- Elliott D, Allard F (1985) The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements. Q J Exp Psych 37A:407–425Google Scholar
- Elliott D, Hansen S (2010) Visual regulation of manual aiming: a comparison of methods. Behav Res Methods (in press)Google Scholar
- Elliott D, Roy EA (1989) Manual asymmetries in aimed movements. Q J Exp Psych 41A:501–516Google Scholar
- Friden J, Lieber RL (2001) Quantitative evaluation of the posterior deltoid to triceps tendon transfer based on muscle architectural properties. J Hand Surg 26A:147–155Google Scholar
- Hansen S, Tremblay L, Elliott D (2005) Part and whole practice: chunking and online control in the acquisition of a serial motor task. Res Q Exercise Sport 76:60–67Google Scholar
- Maraj BKV, Elliott D, Lee TD, Pollock BJ (1993) Variance and invariance in expert and novice triple jumpers. Res Q Exercise Sport 64:404–412Google Scholar
- Marteniuk RG, Ivens CJ, Bertram CP (2000) Evidence of motor equivalence in a pointing task involving locomotion. Mot Control 4:165–184Google Scholar
- Raibert MH (1977) Motor control and learning in a state space model. (Tech. Rep. AI-M-351; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, NTIS AD-A026–960). MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Wright CE (1990) Generalized motor programs: re-examining claims of effector independence in writing. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 294–320Google Scholar