Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 206, Issue 1, pp 93–98 | Cite as

Going the distance: spatial scale of athletic experience affects the accuracy of path integration

  • Alastair D. SmithEmail author
  • Christina J. Howard
  • Niall Alcock
  • Kirsten Cater
Research Note

Abstract

Evidence suggests that athletically trained individuals are more accurate than untrained individuals in updating their spatial position through idiothetic cues. We assessed whether training at different spatial scales affects the accuracy of path integration. Groups of rugby players (large-scale training) and martial artists (small-scale training) participated in a triangle-completion task: they were led (blindfolded) along two sides of a right-angled triangle and were required to complete the hypotenuse by returning to the origin. The groups did not differ in their assessment of the distance to the origin, but rugby players were more accurate than martial artists in assessing the correct angle to turn (heading), and landed significantly closer to the origin. These data support evidence that distance and heading components can be dissociated. Furthermore, they suggest that the spatial scale at which an individual is trained may affect the accuracy of one component of path integration but not the other.

Keywords

Path integration Spatial scale Athletes Idiothetic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

ADS was supported by the Medical Research Council (Grant No. G0401132). This study depended upon the kind assistance of the sportspeople involved. We also gratefully acknowledge Bruce Hood, Iain Gilchrist, Christine Mohr, and the members of the Bristol Cognitive Development Centre.

References

  1. Allen GL, Kirasic KC, Rashotte MA, Haun DBM (2004) Aging and path integration skill: kinesthetic and vestibular contributions to wayfinding. Percept Psychophys 66:170–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alyan S, McNaughton BL (1999) Hippocampectomized rats are capable of homing by path integration. Behav Neurosci 113:19–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthoz A, Amorim MA, Glasauer S, Grasso R, Takei Y, Viaud-Delmon I (1999) Dissociation between distance and direction during locomotor navigation. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Johns Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  4. Bredin J, Kerlirzin Y, Israel I (2005) Path integration: is there a difference between athletes and non-athletes? Exp Brain Res 167:670–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cater K, Fleuriot C, Hull R, Reid J (2005) Location aware interactive applications. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, conference abstracts and applications. ACMGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujita N, Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG (1990) A minimal model for dead-reckoning navigation: updating the homing vector. Geogr Anal 22:326–335Google Scholar
  7. Fujita N, Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG (1993) A minimal model for dead-reckoning navigation: updating the homing vector. Geogr Anal 22:326–335Google Scholar
  8. Gallistel CR (1990) The organization of learning. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Gérin-Lajoie M, Ronsky J, Loitz-Ramage B, Robu I, Richards C, McFadyen B (2007) Navigational strategies during fast walking: a comparison between trained athletes and non-athletes. Gait Posture 26(4):539–545 Google Scholar
  10. Gilchrist ID, North A, Hood B (2001) Is visual search really like foraging? Percept 30:1459–1464 Google Scholar
  11. Klatzky RL, Loomis JM, Golledge RG, Cicinelli JG, Doherty S, Pellegrino JW (1990) Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision. J Motor Behav 22:19–43Google Scholar
  12. Klatzky RL, Beall AC, Loomis JM, Golledge RG, Philbeck JW (1999) Human navigation ability: tests of the encoding-error model of path integration. Spat Cogn Comput 1:31–65Google Scholar
  13. Learmonth AE, Newcombe NS, Huttenlocher J (2001) Toddlers’ use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. J Exp Child Psychol 80:225–244Google Scholar
  14. Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Cicinelli JG, Pellegrino JW, Fry PA (1993) Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:73–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Philbeck JW (1999) Human navigation by path integration. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Johns Hopkins Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  16. Mittelstaedt ML, Mittelstaedt H (2001) Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length. Exp Brain Res 139:318–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Montello DR (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. Lect Notes Comput Sci 716:312–321Google Scholar
  18. Ozel S, Larue J, Molinaro C (2002) Relationship between sport activity and mental rotation: comparison of three groups of subjects. Percept Mot Skill 3:1141–1154Google Scholar
  19. Philbeck JW, Loomis JM, Beall AC (1997) Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Percept Psychophys 59:601–612PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Saint Paul UV (1982) Do geese use path integration for walking home? In: Papi F, Wallraff HG (eds) Avian navigation. Springer, Berlin, pp 298–307Google Scholar
  21. Smith AD, Hood BM, Gilchrist ID (2008a) Visual search and foraging compared in an automated large-scale search task. Cogn Process 9:121–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith AD, Gilchrist ID, Cater K, Ikram N, Nott K, Hood BM (2008b) Reorientation in the real world: the development of landmark use and integration in a natural environment. Cognition 107:1102–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Souman JL, Frissen I, Sreenivasa MN, Ernst MO (2009) Walking straight into circles. Curr Biol 19:1538–1542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Comp Physiol 142:315–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Worsley C, Recce M, Spiers HJ, Marley J, Polkey CE, Morris RG (2001) Path integration following temporal lobectomy in humans. Neuropsychologia 39:452–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alastair D. Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christina J. Howard
    • 2
  • Niall Alcock
    • 3
  • Kirsten Cater
    • 4
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.School of Psychology, Griffith Taylor BuildingUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Bristol Cognitive Development Centre, Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations