Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 203, Issue 3, pp 553–562 | Cite as

‘Alternate-goal bias’ in antisaccades and the influence of expectation

  • Mathias Abegg
  • Amadeo R. Rodriguez
  • Hyung Lee
  • Jason J. S. BartonEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Saccadic performance depends on the requirements of the current trial, but also may be influenced by other trials in the same experiment. This effect of trial context has been investigated most for saccadic error rate and reaction time but seldom for the positional accuracy of saccadic landing points. We investigated whether the direction of saccades towards one goal is affected by the location of a second goal used in other trials in the same experimental block. In our first experiment, landing points (‘endpoints’) of antisaccades but not prosaccades were shifted towards the location of the alternate goal. This spatial bias decreased with increasing angular separation between the current and alternative goals. In a second experiment, we explored whether expectancy about the goal location was responsible for the biasing of the saccadic endpoint. For this, we used a condition where the saccadic goal randomly changed from one trial to the next between locations on, above or below the horizontal meridian. We modulated the prior probability of the alternate-goal location by showing cues prior to stimulus onset. The results showed that expectation about the possible positions of the saccadic goal is sufficient to bias saccadic endpoints and can account for at least part of this phenomenon of ‘alternate-goal bias’.

Keywords

Antisaccade Prosaccade Direction Global effect History Probability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by CIHR operating grant MOP-81270. MA was supported by a grant from the Schweizerische Stiftung für medizinisch-biologische Stipendien and the Swiss National Science Foundation and JB by a Canada Research Chair and a Senior Scholar award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.

References

  1. Arai K, Keller EL (2004) A distributed model of the saccadic system: simulations of trajectory variations produced by multiple competing visual stimuli. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 7:4692–4695PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arai K, Keller EL, Edelman JA (1994) Two-dimensional neural network model of the primate saccadic system. Neural Netw 7:1115–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arai K, McPeek RM, Keller EL (2004) Properties of saccadic responses in monkey when multiple competing visual stimuli are present. J Neurophysiol 91:890–900CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton J, Cherkasova M, Lindgren K, Goff D, Manoach D (2005) What is perseverated in schizophrenia? Evidence of abnormal response plasticity in the saccadic system. J Abnorm Psychol 114:75–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton J, Manoach D, Goff D (2006) The inter-trial effects of stimulus and saccadic direction on prosaccades and antisaccades, in controls and schizophrenic patients. Exp Brain Res 174:487–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Basso M, Wurtz R (1997) Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty. Nature 389:66–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Basso M, Wurtz R (1998) Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability. J Neurosci 18:7519–7534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker W, Jürgens R (1979) An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Res 19:967–983CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter R (2004) Contrast, probability, and saccadic latency: evidence for independence of detection and decision. Curr Biol 14:1576–1580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherkasova M, Manoach D, Intriligator J, Barton J (2002) Antisaccades and task-shifting: interactions in controlled processing. Exp Brain Res 144:528–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Coren S, Hoenig P (1972) Effect of non-target stimuli upon length of voluntary saccades. Percept Mot Skills 34:499–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorris M, Munoz D (1998) Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic inhibition. J Neurosci 18:7015–7026PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorris MC, Pare M, Munoz DP (1997) Neuronal activity in monkey superior colliculus related to the initiation of saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci 17:8566–8579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorris M, Paré M, Munoz D (2000) Immediate neural plasticity shapes motor performance. J Neurosci 20:RC52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelman JA, Goldberg ME (2003) Saccade-related activity in the primate superior colliculus depends on the presence of local landmarks at the saccade endpoint. J Neurophysiol 90:1728–1736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Everling S, Munoz DP (2000) Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. J Neuriosci 20:387–400Google Scholar
  17. Everling S, Dorris MC, Klein RM, Munoz DP (1999) Role of primate superior colliculus in preparation and execution of anti-saccades and pro-saccades. J Neurosci 19:2740–2754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fecteau J, Munoz D (2003) Exploring the consequences of the previous trial. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:435–443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fecteau J, Au C, Armstrong I, Munoz D (2004) Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 159:84–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Findlay JM (1982) Global processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 22:1033–1045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Findlay JM, Blythe HI (2009) Saccade target selection: do distractors affect saccade accuracy? Vision Res 49:1267–1274Google Scholar
  22. Gmeindl L, Rontal A, Reuter-Lorenz P (2005) Strategic modulation of the fixation-offset effect: dissociable effects of target probability on prosaccades and antisaccades. Exp Brain Res 164:194–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. He P, Kowler E (1989) The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies. Vision Res 29:1165–1181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalesnykas R, Hallett P (1987) The differentiation of visually guided and anticipatory saccades in gap and overlap paradigms. Exp Brain Res 68:115–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kapoula Z (1985) Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system. Vision Res 25:1155–1157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koehn JD, Roy E, Barton JJS (2008) The ‘diagonal effect’: a systematic error in oblique antisaccades. J Neurophysiol 100:587–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Koval M, Ford K, Everling S (2004) Effect of stimulus probability on antisaccade error rates. Exp Brain Res 159:268–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Krauzlis R, Liston D, Carello C (2004) Target selection and the superior colliculus: goals, choices and hypotheses. Vision Res 44:1445–1451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee H, Abegg M, Rodriguez A, Koehn J, Barton JJ (2010) Why do humans make antisaccade errors? Exp Brain Res 201: 65–73Google Scholar
  30. Lévy-Schoen A (1969) Determination et latence de la response oculomotrice a deux stimulus. L′Anee Psychol 74:43–66Google Scholar
  31. Manoach DS, Thakkar KN, Cain MS, Polli FE, Edelman JA, Fischl B, Barton JJ (2007) Neural activity is modulated by trial history: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade. J Neurosci 27:1791–1798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Munoz D, Everling S (2004) Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:218–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ottes F, van Gisbergen J, Eggermont J (1984) Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: two different modes. Vision Res 24:1169–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ottes FP, Van Gisbergen JA, Eggermont JJ (1985) Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Res 25:849–862CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Polli F, Barton J, Vangel M, Goff D, Iguchi L, Manoach D (2006) Schizophrenia patients show intact immediate error-related performance adjustments on an antisaccade task. Schizophrenia Res 82:191–201Google Scholar
  36. Reuter B, Philipp A, Koch I, Kathmann N (2006) Effects of switching between leftward and rightward pro- and antisaccades. Biological Psychology 40:122–130Google Scholar
  37. Rycroft N, Hutton S, Rusted J (2006) The antisaccade task as an index of sustained goal activation in working memory: modulation by nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 188:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tatler BW, Hutton SB (2007) Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task. Exp Brain Res 179:387–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Trappenberg TP, Dorris MC, Munoz DP, Klein RM (2001) A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. J Cogn Neurosci 13:256–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Van der Stigchel S, Theeuwes J (2006) Our eyes deviate away from a location where a distractor is expected to appear. Exp Brain Res 169:338–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Opstal AJ, Van Gisbergen JA (1989) A nonlinear model for collicular spatial interactions underlying the metrical properties of electrically elicited saccades. Biol Cybern 60:171–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. van Zoest W, van der Stigchel S, Barton JJS (2008) Distractor effects on saccade trajectories: a comparison of prosaccades, antisaccades, and memory-guided saccades. Exp Brain Res 186:431–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker R, Kentridge RW, Findlay JM (1995) Independent contribution of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latency. Exp Brain Res 103:294–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Walker R, Deubel H, Schneider WX, Findlay JM (1997) Effect of remote distractor on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. J Neurophysiol 78:1108–1119PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Abegg
    • 1
  • Amadeo R. Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Hyung Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jason J. S. Barton
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Human Vision and Eye Movement Laboratory, Departments of Medicine (Neurology), Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyKeimyung University School of MedicineDaeguSouth Korea
  3. 3.Neuro-Ophthalmology Section DVGH Eye Care CentreVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations