Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 203, Issue 2, pp 391–405 | Cite as

Eye–hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects

  • Divya Srinivasan
  • Bernard J. Martin
Research Article

Abstract

Both synchronous and asynchronous coordination modes have been evidenced in bimanual movements, but psychology and motor control literatures seem to be inconclusive about what factors specifically drive these modes and when one is preferred over the other. The goal of the present study was to determine the relationship between visual feedback and the temporal symmetry/asymmetry of the two hand movements in symmetric bimanual reach movements by a systematic analysis of eye movements and their role in coordination. The coupling/decoupling of hand movements caused by the competing visual demands of each task was analyzed in a bimanual experimental paradigm in which the objects to be transported, tolerances of the placement targets, and inter-target distance were varied. The results show that although temporally symmetric until peak velocity, the extent of synchrony during the terminal phases of hand movements was significantly influenced by the visual demand associated with the experimental conditions. Four distinct eye–hand coordination patterns were identified, based on sequencing of hand movements and timing of gaze shifts from one target to another. These patterns significantly affected the kinematics of hand movements and the degree of temporal synchrony in terminal phases, thus stressing the importance of a rigorous analysis of eye movements in understanding the mechanisms of eye–hand coordination. When faced with competing visual demands, left hand guidance required more foveal visual information of the target, while right hand control could proceed until the terminal stages with the target in the peripheral field of view, thus indicating an asymmetry in the feedback requirements of the two hand systems when accuracy is critical.

Keywords

Eye–hand coordination Bimanual movements Placement tasks Gaze strategies Visual feedback Left–right asymmetry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the University of Michigan’s HUMOSIM consortium for their intellectual and material support of this research.

References

  1. Adamo DE, Martin BJ (2009) Position sense asymmetry. Exp Brain Res 192:87–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Balakrishnan R, Hinckley K (2002) Symmetric bimanual interaction. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI conference. CHI letters, vol 2, issue 1, pp 33–40. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Baraldi P, Porro CA, Serafini M, Pagnoni G, Murari C, Corazza R, Nichelli P (1999) Bilateral representation of sequential finger movements in human cortical areas. Neurosci Lett 269:95–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bingham GP, Hughes K, Williams MN (2008) The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects. Exp Brain Res 184:283–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bock O (1993) Localization of objects in the peripheral visual field. Behav Brain Res 56:77–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bootsma RJ, van Wieringen PCW (1992) Spatio-temporal organisation of natural prehension. Hum Mov Sci 11:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruyn JL, Mason AH (2009) Temporal coordination during bimanual reach-to-grasp movements: the role of vision. Q J Exp Psychol 62(7):1328–1342Google Scholar
  8. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998) Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 79(2):1117–1123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Oliveira SC, Barthelemy S (2005) Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions. Exp Brain Res 162(1):78–88Google Scholar
  10. Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Kennerley WS, Ivry RB (2001) Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychol Sci 12(6):493–398Google Scholar
  11. Diedrichsen J, Nambisan R, Kennerly WS, Ivry BR (2004) Independent on-line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching. Eur J Neurosci 19(6):1643–1652Google Scholar
  12. Elliott D, Roy EA, Goodman D, Carson RG, Chua R, Maraj BKV (1993) Asymmetries in the preparation and control of manual aiming movements. Can J Exp Psychol 47:570–589Google Scholar
  13. Fisk JD, Goodale MA (1985) The organization of eye and limb movements during unrestricted reaching to targets in contralateral and ipsilateral visual space. Exp Brain Res 60:159–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Flowers K (1975) Handedness and controlled movement. Br J Psychol 66(1):39–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goble DJ, Brown SH (2007) Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement. Exp Brain Res 180(4):693–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goble DJ, Brown SH (2008) Upper limb asymmetries in the matching of proprioceptive versus visual targets. J Neurophysiol 99:3063–3074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goble DJ, Lewis CA, Brown SH (2006) Upper limb asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback. Exp Brain Res 168(1–2):307–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoff B, Arbib MA (1993) Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. J Mot Behav 25:175–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Kritikos A (1999) Attention for action: coordinating bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. Br J Psychol 90:247–270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: Long J, Baddeley A (eds) Attention and performance IX. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 387–409Google Scholar
  21. Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 16:235–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1983) Visual control of reaching movements in man. Adv Neurol 39:13–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johannson RS, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan JR (2001) Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 21(17):6917–6932Google Scholar
  24. Keele SW (1986) Motor control. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP (eds) Handbook of perception and performance, vol II. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5(2):229–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelso JAS, Putnam CA, Goodman D (1983) On the space-time structure of human interlimb coordination. J Exp Psychol 35A:347–375Google Scholar
  27. Kim SG, Ashe J, Hendrich K, Ellermann JM, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP (1993) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Sci 261:615–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Land MF, Hayhoe M (2001) In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vis Res 41(25–26):3559–3565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mason AH, Bruyn JL (2008) Manual asymmetries in bimanual prehension tasks: manipulation of object size and object distance. Hum Mov Sci 28(1):48–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Meesen RLJ, Levin O, Swinnen SP (2007) The effect of afferent training on long-term neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex. Mediterr Conf Med Biomed Engin Comput 16:643–646Google Scholar
  31. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW (1996) Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 75(5):2144–2149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nudo RJ, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM, Prejean T, Grenda R (1992) Neurophysiological correlates of hand preference in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 12:2918–2947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Paillard J, Amblard B (1985) Static versus kinetic visual cues for the processing of spatial relationships. In: Ingle DJ, Jeannerod M, Lee DN (eds) Brain mechanisms in spatial vision, pp 367–385Google Scholar
  34. Riek S, Tresilian JR, Mon-Williams M, Coppard VL, Carson RG (2003) Bimanual aiming and overt attention: one law for two hands. Exp Brain Res 153(1):59–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rossetti Y, Koga K, Mano T (1993) Prismatic displacement of vision induces transient changes in timing of eye-hand coordination. Percept Psychophys 54(3):355–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy EA, Elliott D (1986) Manual asymmetries in visually directed aiming. Can J Psychol 40(22):109–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sailer U, Eggert T, Ditterich J, Straube A (2000) Spatial and temporal aspects of eye-hand coordination across different tasks. Exp Brain Res 134:163–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142(2):241–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D (2000) Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol 83:2661–2675Google Scholar
  40. Sainburg RL, Schaefer SY (2004) Interlimb differences in control of movement extent. J Neurophysiol 92:1374–1383Google Scholar
  41. Swinnen SP (2002) Intermanual coordination: from behavioral principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(5):348–359Google Scholar
  42. Verschueren SMP, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ, Dounskaia NV (1999) Proprioceptive control of multijoint movement: unimanual circle drawing. Exp Brain Res 127:171–181Google Scholar
  43. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2004) Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Neurophysiol 92:349–360Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Operations EngineeringThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations