Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 203, Issue 1, pp 51–62 | Cite as

Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing

  • Shinobu Kuroki
  • Junji Watanabe
  • Naoki Kawakami
  • Susumu Tachi
  • Shin’ya Nishida
Research Article


The sense of touch is initiated by stimulation of peripheral mechanoreceptors, and then the spatio-temporal pattern of the receptors’ activation is interpreted by central cortical processing. To explore the tactile central processing, we psychophysically studied human judgments of the temporal relationships between two tactile events occurring at different skin locations. We examined four types of two-point temporal judgments—simultaneity, temporal order, apparent motion, and inter-stimulus interval—which differ from one another in time scale and task requirement. To perform any of the four temporal judgment tasks, the brain has to integrate spatially separated inputs. The main focus of the present study is to examine how the spatial separation affects the temporal judgment tasks. Two spatial coordinates can be defined in touch: the somatotopic coordinate, defined by cortical topography, and the spatiotopic coordinate, defined in the environment. In our experiments, the somatotopic distance was manipulated by stimulating the middle and index fingers of the same hand or different hands (ipsilateral vs. bilateral conditions), while the spatiotopic distance was manipulated by increasing the stimulators’ separation under bilateral conditions (bilateral-near vs. bilateral-far conditions). Our results clearly demonstrated that all four of the temporal judgments were significantly affected by the somatotopic distance, but only slightly by the spatiotopic distance. The present results, together with the previous findings, suggest that tactile temporal judgments in a wide range of time scale, from several to several 100 ms, primarily reflect processing at the level of somatotopic representation unless the performance is further constrained by spatial processing.


Tactile temporal processing Somatotopy Simultaneity Temporal order Tactile apparent movement Somatosensory coding Temporal interval estimation 



This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for CREST and JSPS Fellows (20·10531).


  1. Andersen RA (1995) Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 5:457–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andres KH, von During M (1973) Morphology of cutaneous receptors. Handbook of Sensory Physiology II, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod S, Thompson LW, Cohen LD (1968) Effects of senescence on the temporal resolution of somesthetic stimuli presented to one hand or both. J Gerontol 23:191–195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Azañón E, Soto-Faraco S (2007) Alleviating the “crossed-hands” deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands. Exp Brain Res 182:537–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Azañón E, Soto-Faraco S (2008) Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Curr Biol 18:1044–1049CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown SW (1995) Time, change, and motion: the effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Percept Psychophys 57:105–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown LN, Sainsbury RS (2000) Hemispheric equivalence and age-related differences in judgments of simultaneity to somatosensory stimuli. J Clinic Exp Neuropsychol 22:587–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark CR, Geffen GM (1990) Hemispheric equivalence for simultaneity judgements of somatosensory stimuli. Cog Neuropsychol 7:311–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Constanzo R, Gardner EP (1980) A quantitative analysis of responses of direction-sensitive neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 43:1319–1341Google Scholar
  10. Craig JC (1985) Attending to two fingers: two hands are better than one. Percept Psychophys 38:496–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig JC (2003) The effect of hand position and pattern motion on temporal order judgments. Percept Psychophys 65:779–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Craig JC, Baihua X (1990) Temporal order and tactile patterns. Percept Psychophys 47:22–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Driver J, Grossenbacher PG (1996) Multimodal spatial constraints on tactile selective attention. In: Innui T, McClelland JL (eds) Attention and performance XVI: information integration in perception and communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 209–235Google Scholar
  14. Efron R, Lee DN (1971) The visual persistence of a moving stroboscopically illuminated object. Am J Psychol 84:365–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, 5th edn. Chapman& Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Essick GK, Whitsel BL (1985) Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity: a correlative psychophysical and neurophysiological investigation. Brain Res 10:213–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraisse P (1984) Perception and estimation of time. Annu Rev Psychol 35:1–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman AW, Johnson KO (1982) A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey. J Physiol 323:43–64PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedman RM, Chen LM, Roe AW (2004) Modality maps within primate somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12724–12729CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujisaki W, Nishida S (2009) Audio—tactile superiority over visuo—tactile and audio–visual combinations in the temporal resolution of synchrony perception. Exp Brain Res 198:245–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gallace A, Spence C (2005) Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments. Neurosci Lett 379:63–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner EP, Constanzo R (1980) Neuronal mechanisms underlying direction sensitivity of somatosensory cortical neurons in awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 43:1342–1354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Geffen GM, Rosa V, Luciano M (2000) Effect of preferred hand and sex. J Clinic Exp Neuropsychol 22:219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graziano MS (1999) Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:10418–10421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haggard P, Kitadono K, Press C, Taylor-Clarke M (2005) The brain’s fingers and hands. Exp Brain Res 172:94–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansson T, Brismar T (1999) Tactile stimulation of the hand causes bilateral cortical activation: a functional magnetic resonance study in humans. Neurosci Lett 271:29–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrar V, Harris LR (2005) Simultaneity constancy: detecting events with touch and vision. Exp Brain Res 166:465–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Iggo A, Muir AR (1969) The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin. J Physiol 200:763–796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Iwamura Y, Tanaka M, Sakamoto M, Hikosaka O (1983) Converging patterns of finger representation and complex response properties of neurons in area 1 of the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Exp Brain Res 51:327–337Google Scholar
  30. Iwamura Y, Tanaka M, Sakamoto M, Hikosaka O (1993) Rostrocaudal gradients in the neuronal receptive field complexity in the finger region of the alert monkey’s postcentral gyrus. Exp Brain Res 92:360–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Iwamura Y, Iriki A, Tanaka M (1994) Bilateral hand representation in the postcentral somatosensory cortex. Nature 369:554–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansson RS, Vallbo AB (1979) Tactile sensibility in the human hand; relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J Physiol 286:282–300Google Scholar
  33. Johnston A, Bruno A, Watanabe J, Quansah B, Patel N, Dakin S, Nishida S (2008) Visually-based temporal distortion in dyslexia. Vis Res 48:1743–1858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones EG, Powell TPS (1970) Connections of the somatic sensory cortex of the rhesus monkey. III. Thalamic connections. Brain 93:37–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kajimoto H, Inami M, Kawakami N, Tachi S (2004) SmartTouch: electric skin to touch the untouchable. IEEE CG&A 24:36–43Google Scholar
  36. Kalaska JF, Cohen DA, Prud’homme M, Hyde ML (1990) Parietal area 5 neuronal activity encodes movement kinematics, not movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res 80:351–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirman JH (1974) Tactile apparent movement: the effects of interstimulus onset interval and stimulus duration. Percept Psychophys 15:1–6Google Scholar
  38. Kirman JH (1975) The effect of number of stimulators on the optimal interstimulus onset interval in tactile apparent movement. Percept Psychophys 17:263–267Google Scholar
  39. Lakatos S, Shepard RN (1997) Time-distance relations in shifting attention between locations on one’s body. Percept Psychophys 59:557–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lines CR, Rugg MD, Milner AD (1984) The effect of stimulus intensity on visual evoked potential estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Exp Brain Res 57:89–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Motoyoshi I (2004) The role of spatial interactions in perceptual synchrony. J Vis 4:352–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nicholls ME, Lindell AK (2000) A left hemisphere, but not right hemispace, advantage for tactual simultaneity judgments. Percept Psychophys 62:717–725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pöppel E (1988) Mindworks: time and conscious experience. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell TPS, Moutcastle VB (1959) Some aspects of the functional organization of the postcentral gyrus of the monkey: a correlation of findings obtained in a single unit analysis with cytoarchitecture. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 105:133–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rinker MA, Craig JC (1994) The effect of spatial orientation on the perception of moving tactile stimuli. Percept Psycophys 56:356–362Google Scholar
  46. Roberts RD, Humphreys GW (2008) Task effects on tactile temporal order judgments: when space does and does not matter. J Exp Psychol 34:592–604Google Scholar
  47. Sakata H, Takaoka Y, Kawarasaki A, Shibutani H (1973) Somatosensory properties of neurons in the superior parietal cortex (area 5) of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 64:85–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanabria D, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C (2005) Spatiotemporal interactions between audition and touch depend on hand posture. Exp Brain Res 165:505–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Saron CD, Davidson RJ (1989) Visual evoked potential measures of interhemispheric transfer time in humans. Behav Neurosci 103:1115–1138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Schnitzler A, Salmelin R, Salenius S, Jousmaki V, Hari R (1995) Tactile information from the human hand reaches the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Lett 200:25–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shanks MF, Powell TPS (1981) An electron microscopic study of the termination of thalamocortical fibres in areas 3b, 1 and 2 of the somatic sensory cortex in the monkey. Brain Res 218:35–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sherrick CE (1968) Bilateral apparent haptic movement. Percept Psychophys 4:159–162Google Scholar
  53. Sherrick CE (1970) Temporal ordering of events in haptic space. IEEE Trans Man Machine Syst 11:25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sherrick CE, Rogers R (1966) Apparent haptic movement. Percept Psycophys 1:175–180Google Scholar
  55. Shore DI, Spry E, Spence C (2002) Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Cogn Brain Res 14:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shore DI, Gray K, Spry E, Spence C (2005) Spatial modulation of tactile temporal order judgments. Perception 34:1251–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Soto-Faraco S, Ronald A, Spence C (2004a) Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception. Percept Psychophys 66:1077–1094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, Kingstone A (2004b) Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:208–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Spencer PS, Schaumburg HH (1973) An ultrastructural study of the inner core of the Paccinian corpuscle. J Neurocytol 2:217–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Suto Y (1952) The effect of space on time estimation (S-effect) in tactual space (I). Japanese J Psychol 22:189–201Google Scholar
  61. Terao M, Watanabe J, Yagi A, Nishida S (2008) Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent temporal intervals. Nat Neurosci 11:541–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Tse PU, Intriligator J, Rivest J, Cavanagh P (2004) Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Percept Psychophys 66:1171–1189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. van Eijk RL, Kohlrausch A, Juola JF, van de Par S (2008) Audiovisual synchrony and temporal order judgments: effects of experimental method and stimulus type. Percept Psychophys 70:955–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Victor JD, Conte MM (2002) Temporal phase discrimination depends critically on separation. Vis Res 42:2063–2071CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Warren S, Hamalainen HA, Gardner EP (1986) Objective classification of motion- and direction-sensitive neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. J Neurophysiol 56:598–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Yamamoto S, Kitazawa S (2001) Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nature Neurosci 4:759–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Yoblick DA, Salvendy G (1970) Influence of frequency on the estimation of time for auditory, visual, and tactile modalities: the Kappa effect. J Exp Psychol 86:157–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shinobu Kuroki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Junji Watanabe
    • 2
    • 3
  • Naoki Kawakami
    • 1
  • Susumu Tachi
    • 4
  • Shin’ya Nishida
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Information Science and TechnologyThe University of TokyoBunkyo, TokyoJapan
  2. 2.NTT Communication Science LaboratoriesNippon Telegraph and Telephone CorporationAtsugi, KanagawaJapan
  3. 3.Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAtsugi, KanagawaJapan
  4. 4.Graduate School of Media DesignKeio UniversityYokohama, KanagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations