Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 203, Issue 1, pp 75–87 | Cite as

Learning a visuomotor rotation: simultaneous visual and proprioceptive information is crucial for visuomotor remapping

  • Britne A. Shabbott
  • Robert L. SainburgEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Visuomotor adaptation is mediated by errors between intended and sensory-detected arm positions. However, it is not clear whether visual-based errors that are shown during the course of motion lead to qualitatively different or more efficient adaptation than errors shown after movement. For instance, continuous visual feedback mediates online error corrections, which may facilitate or inhibit the adaptation process. We addressed this question by manipulating the timing of visual error information and task instructions during a visuomotor adaptation task. Subjects were exposed to a visuomotor rotation, during which they received continuous visual feedback (CF) of hand position with instructions to correct or not correct online errors, or knowledge-of-results (KR), provided as a static hand-path at the end of each trial. Our results showed that all groups improved performance with practice, and that online error corrections were inconsequential to the adaptation process. However, in contrast to the CF groups, the KR group showed relatively small reductions in mean error with practice, increased inter-trial variability during rotation exposure, and more limited generalization across target distances and workspace. Further, although the KR group showed improved performance with practice, after-effects were minimal when the rotation was removed. These findings suggest that simultaneous visual and proprioceptive information is critical in altering neural representations of visuomotor maps, although delayed error information may elicit compensatory strategies to offset perturbations.

Keywords

Visuomotor adaptation Visuomotor rotation Feedback Vision Knowledge-of-results 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Marisa Alcaro for participant recruitment and scholarly discussions regarding this manuscript. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant #R01HD39311.

References

  1. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL (2002) Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol 88:2408–2421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagesteiro LB, Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL (2006) Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance. Exp Brain Res 171:358–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baraduc P, Wolpert DM (2002) Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. J Neurophysiol 88:973–981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bedford FL (1989) Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bedford FL (1993) Perceptual and cognitive spatial learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:517–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bock O (2005) Components of sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly subjects. Exp Brain Res 160:259–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL (2003a) Limb position drift: implications for control of posture and movement. J Neurophysiol 90:3105–3118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown LE, Rosenbaum DA, Sainburg RL (2003b) Movement speed effects on limb position drift. Exp Brain Res 153:266–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caithness G, Osu R, Bays P, Chase H, Klassen J, Kawato M, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2004) Failure to consolidate the consolidation theory of learning for sensorimotor adaptation tasks. J Neurosci 24:8662–8671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Choe CS, Welch RB (1974) Variables affecting the intermanual transfer and decay of prism adaptation. J Exp Psychol 102:1076–1084CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen RG, Sternad D (2008) Variability in motor learning: relocating, channeling and reducing noise. Exp Brain Res 193:69–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham HA, Welch RB (1994) Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:987–999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:761–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch KM, Newell KM (2004) Changes in the structure of children’s isometric force variability with practice. J Exp Child Psychol 88:319–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI (1996) Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J Neurosci 16:7085–7096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Ghez C (1995) Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of work space produces directional biases in other areas. J Neurophysiol 73:2535–2539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghilardi M, Ghez C, Dhawan V, Moeller J, Mentis M, Nakamura T, Antonini A, Eidelberg D (2000) Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning. Brain Res 871:127–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Heuer H, Hegele M (2008) Adaptation to visuomotor rotations in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging 23:190–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinder MR, Tresilian JR, Riek S, Carson RG (2008) The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: how much and when? Brain Res 1197:123–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinder MR, Riek S, Tresilian JR, de Rugy A, Carson RG (2010) Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 201:197–207Google Scholar
  21. Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE (1997) Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res 115:557–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klassen J, Tong C, Flanagan JR (2005) Learning and recall of incremental kinematic and dynamic sensorimotor transformations. Exp Brain Res 164:250–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (2000) Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci 20:8916–8924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF (2005) Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci 25:473–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lateiner JE, Sainburg RL (2003) Differential contributions of vision and proprioception to movement accuracy. Exp Brain Res 151:446–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW (2006) An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26:3642–3645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Miall RC, Jenkinson N, Kulkarni K (2004) Adaptation to rotated visual feedback: a re-examination of motor interference. Exp Brain Res 154:201–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mosier KM, Scheidt RA, Acosta S, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2005) Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. J Neurophysiol 94:4362–4372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pine ZM, Krakauer JW, Gordon J, Ghez C (1996) Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport 7:2357–2361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Prager AD, Contreras-Vidal JL (2003) Adaptation to display rotation and display gain distortions during drawing. Hum Mov Sci 22:173–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Redding GM, Wallace B (1996) Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:379–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Redding GM, Wallace B (2002) Strategic calibration and spatial alignment: a model from prism adaptation. J Mot Behav 34:126–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Roby-Brami A, Burnod Y (1995) Learning a new visuomotor transformation: error correction and generalization. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2:229–242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142:241–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D (1999) Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81:1045–1056PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarlegna FR, Sainburg RL (2007) The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance. Exp Brain Res 176:267–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Saunders JA, Knill DC (2004) Visual feedback control of hand movements. J Neurosci 24:3223–3234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaefer SY, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL (2009) Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke. Brain Res 1298:78–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2003) Multisensory integration during motor planning. J Neurosci 23:6982–6992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sober SJ, Sabes PN (2005) Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning. Nat Neurosci 8:490–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989) Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol 62:582–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tillery SI, Flanders M, Soechting JF (1991) A coordinate system for the synthesis of visual and kinesthetic information. J Neurosci 11:770–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tong C, Flanagan JR (2003) Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. J Neurophysiol 90:578–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ (2007) Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98:54–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Vindras P, Viviani P (1998) Frames of reference and control parameters in visuomanual pointing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:569–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vindras P, Viviani P (2002) Altering the visuomotor gain. Evidence that motor plans deal with vector quantities. Exp Brain Res 147:280–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2005) Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. J Neurosci 25:4024–4030CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2006) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness. Exp Brain Res 175:223–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang X, Merzenich MM, Sameshima K, Jenkins WM (1995) Remodelling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation. Nature 378:71–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolpert DM, Miall RC (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9:1265–1279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zarahn E, Weston GD, Liang J, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW (2008) Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient. J Neurophysiol 100:2537–2548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Huck Institutes of the Life SciencesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.The Department of KinesiologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.The Department of NeurologyPenn State Hershey Medical CenterHersheyUSA

Personalised recommendations