Effects of response-set size on error-related brain activity
To study the effect of response-set size on action monitoring processes, the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN), the correct-related negativity (Nc/CRN), and behavioral indicators of action monitoring were compared across three groups of participants performing a two-choice, a four-choice, or an eight-choice version of the flanker task. After controlling for differential contribution of stimulus-related activity to response-locked averages resulting from large differences in response times across conditions, response-set size had strong effects on Ne/ERN and Nc/CRN. With increasing response-set size, the Ne/ERN amplitude decreased, but the Nc/CRN amplitude increased. Moreover, post-error behavioral adjustments were impaired with an increasing response-set size. These results suggest that action monitoring severely suffers when response-set size is increased. Implications of these findings for present theories of Ne/ERN and Nc/CRN are discussed.
KeywordsAction monitoring Error-related negativity Response uncertainty Post-error slowing Error detection Error signaling response
- Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16:143–149Google Scholar
- Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, Blanke L (1990) Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In: Brunia CHM, Gaillard AWK, Kok A (eds) Psychophysiological brain research, 1. University Press, Tilburg, pp 192–195Google Scholar
- Hajcak G, Vidal F, Simons RF (2004) Difficulties with easy tasks: ERN/Ne and stimulus component overlap. In: Ullsperger M, Falkenstein M (eds) Errors, conflicts, the brain. Current opinions on performance monitoring, 1. Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, pp 204–211Google Scholar
- Rabbitt PMA (2002) Consciousness is slower than you think. Q J Exp Psychol Hum Exp Psychol 55:1081–1092Google Scholar