Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 200, Issue 3–4, pp 277–282 | Cite as

Combining multisensory temporal information for movement synchronisation

  • Alan M. Wing
  • Michail Doumas
  • Andrew E. Welchman
Research Note

Abstract

The ability to synchronise actions with environmental events is a fundamental skill supporting a variety of group activities. In such situations, multiple sensory cues are usually available for synchronisation, yet previous studies have suggested that auditory cues dominate those from other modalities. We examine the control of rhythmic action on the basis of auditory and haptic cues and show that performance is sensitive to both sources of information for synchronisation. Participants were required to tap the dominant hand index finger in synchrony with a metronome defined by periodic auditory tones, imposed movements of the non-dominant index finger, or both cues together. Synchronisation was least variable with the bimodal metronome as predicted by a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) model. However, increases in timing variability of the auditory cue resulted in some departures from the MLE model. Our findings indicate the need for further investigation of the MLE account of the integration of multisensory signals in the temporal control of action.

Keywords

Movement timing Action Synchronisation Multisensory Cue combination Haptic auditory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (grant no. G9901257) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grant nos C520620 and E0095651). MD is a postdoctoral fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO) Flanders. We thank Nick Roach for assistance in setting up the haptic stimulus apparatus.

References

  1. Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14:257–262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aschersleben G (2002) Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization. Brain Cogn 48:66–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aschersleben G, Bertelson P (2003) Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 2. Evidence from sensorimotor synchronization. Int J Psychophysiol 50:157–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Doumas M, Wing AM (2007) Timing and trajectory in rhythm production. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:442–455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott M, Welchman AE, Wing AM (2009) Being discrete helps keep to the beat. Exp Brain Res 192:731–737. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1646-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8:162–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolers PA, Brewster JM (1985) Rhythms and responses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:150–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maduell M, Wing AM (2007) The dynamics of ensemble: the case for flamenco. Psychol Music 35:591–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mamassian P (2008) Overconfidence in an objective anticipatory motor task. Psychol Sci 19:601–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oruc I, Maloney LT, Landy MS (2003) Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Res 43:2451–2468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Repp BH (2000) Compensation for subliminal timing perturbations in perceptual-motor synchronization. Psychol Res Psychol Forschung 63:106–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Repp BH (2001) Phase correction, phase resetting, and phase shifts after subliminal timing perturbations in sensorimotor synchronization. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 27:600–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Repp BH, Penel A (2002) Auditory dominance in temporal processing: New evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 28:1085–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ridderikhoff A, Peper CL, Beek PJ (2005) Unraveling interlimb interactions underlying bimanual coordination. J Neurophysiol 94:3112–3125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Semjen A, Summers JJ (2002) Timing goals in bimanual coordination. Q J Exp Psychol A 55:155–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Gon JJ (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: an experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81:1355–1364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vorberg D, Schulze HH (2002) Linear phase-correction in synchronization: predictions, parameter estimation, and simulations. J Math Psychol 46:56–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vorberg D, Wing A (1996) Modelling variability and dependence in timing. In: Keele S, Heuer H (eds) Handbook of perception and action. Academic Press, New York, pp 181–262Google Scholar
  20. Wing AM (1980) The long and short of timing. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behavior. North Holland Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Wing AM (2002) Voluntary timing and brain function: an information processing approach. Brain Cogn 48:7–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973) Response delays and timing of discrete motor responses. Percept Psychophys 14:5–12Google Scholar
  23. Wing AM, Woodburn C (1995) The coordination and consistency of rowers in a racing eight. J Sports Sci 13:187–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan M. Wing
    • 1
  • Michail Doumas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrew E. Welchman
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyK. U. LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations