Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 204, Issue 3, pp 343–352 | Cite as

Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects

  • Manos Tsakiris
  • Lewis Carpenter
  • Dafydd James
  • Aikaterini Fotopoulou
Research article

Abstract

The experience of body ownership can be successfully manipulated during the rubber hand illusion using synchronous multisensory stimulation. The hypothesis that multisensory integration is both a necessary and sufficient condition for body ownership is debated. We systematically varied the appearance of the object that was stimulated in synchrony or asynchrony with the participant’s hand. A viewed object that was transformed in three stages from a plain wooden block to a wooden hand was compared to a realistic rubber hand. Introspective and behavioural results show that participants experience a sense of ownership only for the realistic prosthetic hand, suggesting that not all objects can be experienced as part of one’s body. Instead, the viewed object must fit with a reference model of the body that contains important structural information about body parts. This body model can distinguish between corporeal and non-corporeal objects, and it therefore plays a critical role in maintaining a coherent sense of one’s body.

Keywords

Rubber hand illusion Body ownership Multisensory integration Body model Body representations 

References

  1. Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1499–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austen EL, Soto-Faraco S, Enns JT, Kingstone A (2004) Mislocalisation of touch to a fake hand. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4:170–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Capelari ED, Uribe C, Brasil-Neto JP (2009) Feeling pain in the rubber hand: integration of visual, proprioceptive, and painful stimuli. Perception 38:92–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Costantini M, Haggard P (2007) The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Conscious Cogn 16:229–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Daprati E, Sirigu A, Pradat-Diehl P, Franck N, Jeannerod M (2000) Recognition of self-produced movement in a case of severe neglect. Neurocase 6:477–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Preester H, Tsakiris M (2009) Body-extension versus body-incorporation: is there a need for a body-model? Phenomenol Cogn Sci 8(3):307–319. doi:10.1007/s11097-009-9121-y Google Scholar
  8. De Vignemont F, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) Body mereology. In: Knoblich G, Thornton I, Grosjean M, Shiffrar M (eds) Human body perception from the inside out. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Durgin FH, Evans L, Dunphy N, Klostermann S, Simmons K (2007) Rubber hands feel the touch of light. Psychol Sci 18:152–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehrsson HH (2007) The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 317:1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That’s my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305:875–877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehrsson HH, Holmes NP, Passingham RE (2005) Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. J Neurosci 25:10564–10573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrsson HH, Wiech K, Weiskopf N, Dolan RJ, Passingham RE (2007) Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:9828–9833CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehrsson HH (2009) How many arms make a pair? Perceptual illusion of having an additional limb. Perception 38:310–312 Google Scholar
  15. Graziano MSA, Botvinik MM (2001) How the brain represents the body: insights from neurophysiology and psychology. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Common mechanisms in perception and action, attention and performance XIX. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Graziano MS, Cooke DF, Taylor CS (2000) Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 290:1782–1786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Haans A, Ijsselsteijn WA, de Kort YA (2008) The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 5(4):389–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hägni K, Eng K, Hepp-Reymond MC, Holper L, Keisker B, Siekierka E, Kiper DC (2008) Observing virtual arms that you imagine are yours increases the galvanic skin response to an unexpected threat. PLoS One 3(8):e3082Google Scholar
  19. Holmes NP, Spence C (2006) Beyond the body schema: visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness. In: Knoblich G, Thornton I, Grosjean M, Shiffrar M (eds) Human body perception from the inside out. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–64Google Scholar
  20. Holmes NP, Snijders HJ, Spence C (2006) Reaching with alien limbs: visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Percept Psychophys 68:685–701PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Howell DC (1997) Statistical methods for psychology, 4th edn. Duxbury, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  22. Kammers MP, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, Hogendoorn H, De Vignemont F, Schutter DJ (2008) Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. J Cogn Neurosci 21:1311–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47:204–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenggenhager B, Tadi T, Metzinger T, Blanke O (2007) Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317:1096–1099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lloyd DM (2007) Spatial limits on referred touch to an alien limb may reflect boundaries of visuo-tactile peripersonal space surrounding the hand. Brain Cogn 64:104–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Longo M, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107:978–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MP, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2009) Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychol 132(2):166–172Google Scholar
  28. Makin TR, Holmes NP, Ehrsson HH (2008) On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav Brain Res 191:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moseley GL, Olthof N, Venema A, Don S, Wijers M, Gallace A, Spence C (2008) Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:13169–13173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pavani F, Spence C, Driver J (2000) Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol Sci 11:353–359Google Scholar
  31. Pavani F, Zampini M (2007) The role of hand size in the fake-hand illusion paradigm. Perception 36:1547–1554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2008) If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS One 3(12):e3832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Press C, Heyes C, Haggard P, Eimer M (2008) Visuotactile learning and body representation: an ERP study with rubber hands and rubber objects. J Cogn Neurosci 20:312–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schütz-Bosbach S, Mancini B, Aglioti SM, Haggard P (2006) Self and other in the human motor system. Curr Biol 16(8):1830–1834Google Scholar
  35. Schütz-Bosbach S, Tausche P, Weiss C (2009) Roughness perception during the rubber hand illusion. Brain Cogn 70:136–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwoebel J, Coslett HB (2005) Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J Cogn Neurosci 17:543–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sirigu A, Grafman J, Bressler K, Sunderland T (1991) Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain 114:629–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Slater M, Perez-Marcos D, Ehrsson HH, Sanchez-Vives MV (2008) Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Front Hum Neurosci 2:6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsakiris M (2008) Looking for myself: current multisensory input alters self-face recognition. PLoS One 3(12):e4040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tsakiris M (2009) My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia (in press)Google Scholar
  41. Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:80–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: how agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn 15:423–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tsakiris M, Hesse M, Boy C, Haggard P, Fink GR (2007a) Neural correlates of body-ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb Cortex 17:2235–2244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tsakiris M, Schütz-Bosbach S, Gallagher S (2007b) On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious Cogn 16:645–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tsakiris M, Costantini M, Haggard P (2008) The role of the right temporoparietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one’s body. Neuropsychologia 46:3014–3018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Vallar G, Ronchi R (2009) Somatoparaphrenia: a body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Exp Brain Res 192:533–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manos Tsakiris
    • 1
  • Lewis Carpenter
    • 1
  • Dafydd James
    • 1
  • Aikaterini Fotopoulou
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonEgham, SurreyUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive NeuroscienceUniversity College LondonEgham, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations