Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 201, Issue 1, pp 111–117 | Cite as

Presaccadic attention interferes with feature detection

  • Thérèse Collins
  • Tobias Heed
  • Karine Doré-Mazars
  • Brigitte Röder
Research Note


Preparing a saccadic eye movement to a particular spatial location enhances the perception of visual targets at this location and decreases perception of nearby targets prior to movement onset. This effect has been termed the orientation of pre-saccadic attention. Here, we investigated whether pre-saccadic attention influenced the detection of a simple visual feature—a process that has been hypothesized to occur without the need for attention. Participants prepared a saccade to a cued location and detected the occurrence of a “pop-out” feature embedded in distracters at the same or different location. The results show that preparing a saccade to a given location decreased detection of features at non-aimed-for locations, suggesting that the selection of a location as the next saccade endpoint influences sensitivity to basic visual features across the visual field.


Saccade Visual perception Attention 



T.C. was supported by an Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellowship. The authors thank Sybille Röper and Jonathan Schubert for help with participants.


  1. Baldauf D, Deubel H (2008) Properties of attentional selection during the preparation of sequential saccades. Exp Brain Res 184(3):411–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Briand K, Klein R (1987) Is Posner’s “Beam” the same as Treisman’s “Glue”?: on the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:228–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrasco M, Yeshurun Y (1998) The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:673–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrasco M, Giordano AM, McElree B (2006) Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: feature and conjunction searches. Vis Res 46:2028–2040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Castet E, Jeanjean S, Montagnini A, Laugier D, Masson GS (2006) Dynamics of attentional deployment during saccadic programming. J Vis 6:196–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbetta M, Shulman G (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:201–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Deubel H (2008) The time course of presaccadic attention shifts. Psychol Res 72(6):630–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deubel H, Schneider W (1996) Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vis Res 26:1827–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deubel H, Schneider W (2003) Delayed saccades, but not delayed manual aiming movements, require visual attention shifts. Ann NY Acad Sci 1004:289–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doré-Mazars K, Pouget P, Beauvillain C (2004) Attentional selection during preparation of eye movements. Psychol Res 69:67–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman J, Subramaniam B (1995) The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57:787–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kowler E, Anderson E, Dosher B, Blaser E (1995) The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vis Res 35:1897–1916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Posner M (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32:3–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Posner M, Snyder CRR, Davidson BJ (1980) Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prinzmetal W, Presti D, Posner M (1986) Does attention affect visual feature integration? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 12:361–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (1998) Spatial attention: mechanisms and theories. In: Sabourin M, Craik F (eds) Advances in psychological science. Biological and cognitive aspects, vol 2. Psychology Press, Montreal, pp 171–198Google Scholar
  17. Schneider W (1995) VAM: a neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Vis Cogn 2:331–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Theeuwes J (1994) Exogenous and endogenous control of visual selection. Perception 23:429–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Theeuwes J, Kramer A, Atchley P (1999a) Attentional effects on preattentive vision: spatial precues affect the detection of simple features. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:341–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Theeuwes J, Kramer A, Hahn S, Irwin D, Zelinsky G (1999b) Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1595–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Treisman A, Gormican S (1988) Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychol Rev 95:15–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Treisman A, Schmidt H (1982) Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cogn Psychol 14:107–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Triesman A, Gelade G (1980) A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 12:97–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thérèse Collins
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tobias Heed
    • 1
  • Karine Doré-Mazars
    • 3
  • Brigitte Röder
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Psychology and NeuropsychologyUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Psychology of Perception LaboratoryParis Descartes University and CNRSParisFrance
  3. 3.Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience LaboratoryParis Descartes University and CNRSBoulogne-BillancourtFrance

Personalised recommendations