Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 198, Issue 4, pp 535–539 | Cite as

The conscious experience of action and intention

Research Note

Abstract

The neural signals that give rise to our experience of the actions we perform are not well understood. Obhi et al. (Cognition 110:65–73, 2009) proposed that both efferent and re-afferent signals contribute to the conscious awareness of intentional actions. We further highlight the role of these signals in the awareness of our actions and the intention to perform these actions. We obtained temporal judgments of movement onset and the intention to execute finger and toe movements. This enabled us to compare our results with predictions corresponding to the conduction length of either effector. Our results confirm the findings of Obhi et al. (Cognition 110:65–73, 2009) that both efferent and re-afferent signals contribute to the awareness of planned actions and suggest that these signals may also play a role in our experience of our intention to perform an action.

Keywords

Consciousness Awareness Intention Action Judgments Libet Free-will 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a discovery grant from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada awarded to SSO, and infrastructure provided by funding from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (to SSO).

References

  1. Bard C, Paillard J, Teasdale N, Fleury M, Lajoie Y (1991) Selfinduced versus reactive triggering of synchronous hand and heel movement in young and old subjects. Kluwer/Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Blakemore S, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 6(6):237–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brass M, Haggard P (2008a) To do or not to do? The neural signature of self-control. J Neurosci 27(34):9141–9145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brass M, Haggard P (2008b) The what, where, whether model of intentional action. Neuroscientist 14:319–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colebatch JG (2007) Bereitschaftspotential and movement-related potentials: origin, significance, and application in disorders of human movement. Mov Disord 22(5):601–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deecke L (1990) Electrophysiological correlates of movement preparation. Rev Neurol 146(10):612–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Haggard P (2005) Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 6:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haggard P (2008) Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:934–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haggard P, Eimer M (1999) On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 126(1):128–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106(Pt 3):623–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsuhashi M, Hallett M (2008) The timing of conscious intention. Eur J Neurosci 28(11):2344–2351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Obhi SS (2007) Evidence for feedback dependent conscious awareness of action. Brain Res 1161:88–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Obhi SS, Planetta JP, Scantlebury J (2009) On the signals underlying conscious awareness of action. Cognition 110:65–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarrazin JC, Cleeremans A, Haggard P (2008) How do we know what we are doing? Time, intention and awareness of action. Conscious Cogn 17:602–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shibasaki H, Hallett M (2006) What is the Bereitschaftspotential? Clin Neurophysiol 117:2341–2356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Soon CS, Brass M, Heinze HJ, Haynes JD (2008) Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the brain. Nat Neurosci 11(5):543–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stenneken P, Aschersleben G, Cole J, Prinz W (2002) Self-induced versus reactive triggering of synchronous movements in a deafferented patient and control subjects. Psychol Res 66(1):40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3(Suppl):1212–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolpert DM, Miall RC (1996) Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 9(8):1265–1279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Cognitive NeuroscienceWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations