Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 197, Issue 3, pp 269–278 | Cite as

Interactions between new and pre-existing dynamics in bimanual movement control

Research Article


Motor skills are commonly acquired through practice. This process not only involves acquisition of the particular task demands but also requires overcoming pre-existing modes. In the present study, interactions between new and intrinsic dynamics were evaluated. Accordingly, bimanual finger tapping with a 2:1 ratio was performed according to two training schedules: continuous (consecutive trials) and interrupted (non-consecutive trials with intermediate 1:1 in-phase performances). In addition, in-phase and anti-phase were probed before and after training. Behavioral output was assessed by means of temporal accuracy and variability, whereas neural activation patterns were determined by EEG coherence. Results showed that continuous practice resulted in improved performance with reduced coherence across the motor network. For interrupted practice, behavioral execution ameliorated, although it was inferior to performance with continuous practice. In terms of neural changes, the degree of intrahemispheric and midline connectivity did not reduce with interrupted practice, whereas interhemispheric connectivity increased. This signifies that short-term motor consolidation of the 2:1 task was disrupted due to intermediate performance of the in-phase mode. Furthermore, the probed in-phase and anti-phase pattern showed no behavioral changes, although neural alterations occurred that depended on training schedule and coordination mode. Overall, the observations illustrate bidirectional interactions between new and inherent dynamics during motor acquisition, raising issues about effective methods for learning skills and scheduling of practices in neurorehabilitation.


EEG Functional connectivity Coherence Motor acquisition 



This research was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Grant BB/F012454/1) and Research Committee (NRF) of the University of Nottingham. Thanks to E. Georgiadi for assistance.


  1. Bays PM, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM (2005) Interference between velocity-dependent and position-dependent force-fields indicates that tasks depending on different kinematic parameters compete for motor working memory. Exp Brain Res 63:400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belger A, Banich MT (1998) Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. Neuropsychology 12:380–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996) Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382:252–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen YC, Thaler D, Nixon PD, Stern CE, Passingham RE (1995) The functions of the medial premotor cortex. II. The timing and selection of learned movements. Exp Brain Res 102:461–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Swinnen SP (2004) Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a new bimanual coordination task. Neuropsychologia 42:855–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyon J, Benali H (2005) Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Dambrosia J, Murase N, Olivier E, Cohen LG (2005) Kinematically specific interhemispheric inhibition operating in the process of generation of a voluntary movement. Cereb Cortex 15:588–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erdler M, Windischberger C, Lanzenberger R, Edward V, Gartus A, Deecke L, Beisteiner R (2001) Dissociation of supplementary motor area and primary motor cortex in human subjects when comparing index and little finger movements with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett 313:5–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW, Frith CD, Driver J, Frackowiak RSJ, Dolan RJ (1999) The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 122:497–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fontaine RJ, Lee TD, Swinnen SP (1997) Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern: reciprocal influences of intrinsic and to-be-learned patterns. Can J Exp Psychol 51:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G (1991) Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol 77:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerloff C, Corwell B, Chen R, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998) The role of the human motor cortex in the control of complex and simple finger movement sequences. Brain 121:1695–1709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grefkes C, Eickhoff SB, Nowak DA, Dafotakis M, Fink GR (2008) Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM. Neuroimage 41:1382–1394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haslinger B, Erhard P, Altenmüller E, Hennenlotter A, Schwaiger M, Gräfin von Einsiedel H, Rummeny E, Conrad B, Ceballos-Baumann AO (2004) Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists. Hum Brain Mapp 22:206–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hummel F, Andres F, Altenmüller E, Dichgans J, Gerloff C (2002) Inhibitory control of acquired motor programmes in the human brain. Brain 125:404–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansen-Berg H, Matthews PM (2002) Attention to movement modulates activity in sensori-motor areas, including primary motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 142:13–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelso JA (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 246:R1000–R1004Google Scholar
  18. Kelso JA, Zanone PG (2002) Coordination dynamics of learning and transfer across different effector systems. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:776–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the coordination of two-handed movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5:229–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelso JA, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN (1981) Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. J Mot Behav 13:226–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kinsbourne M (1970) The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol 33:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kostrubiec V, Tallet J, Zanone PG (2006) How a new behavioral pattern is stabilized with learning determines its persistence and flexibility in memory. Exp Brain Res 170:238–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF (2005) Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci 25:473–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P, Ghazizadeh A, Ravindran R, Shadmehr R (2006) Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. PLoS Biol 10:1798–1808Google Scholar
  25. Lee TD, Magill RA (1985) Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In: Goodman D, Wilberg RB, Franks IM (eds) Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Macar F, Vidal F (2002) Time processing reflected by EEG surface Laplacians. Exp Brain Res 145:403–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maslovat D, Chus R, Lee TD, Franks IM (2004) Contextual interference: single task versus multi-task learning. Motor Control 8:213–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nowicka A, Grabowska A, Fersten E (1996) Interhemispheric transmission of information and functional asymmetry of the human brain. Neuropsychologia 34:147–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Proteau L, Marteniuk RG, Lévesque LA (1992) Sensorimotor basis for motor learning: evidence indicating specificity of practice. Q J Exp Psychol A 44:557–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Puttemans V, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2005) Changes in brain activation during the acquisition of a multifrequency bimanual coordination task: from the cognitive stage to advanced levels of automaticity. J Neurosci 25:4270–4278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rémy F, Wenderoth N, Lipkens K, Swinnen SP (2008) Acquisition of a new bimanual coordination pattern modulates the cerebral activations elicited by an intrinsic pattern: an fMRI study. Cortex 44:482–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rowe J, Friston K, Frackowiak R, Passingham R (2002) Attention to action: specific modulation of corticocortical interactions in humans. Neuroimage 17:988–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sadato N, Yonekura Y, Waki A, Yamada H, Ishii Y (1997) Role of the supplementary motor area and the right premotor cortex in the coordination of bimanual finger movements. J Neurosci 17:9667–9674PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  36. Semjen A (2002) On the timing basis of bimanual coordination in discrete and continuous tasks. Brain Cogn 48:133–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Serrien DJ (2009) Functional connectivity patterns during motor behaviour: the impact of past on present activity. Hum Brain Mapp 30:523–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Serrien DJ, Brown P (2002) The functional role of interhemispheric synchronization in the control of bimanual timing tasks. Exp Brain Res 147:268–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Serrien DJ, Swinnen SP (1997) Coordination constraints induced by effector combination under isofrequency and multifrequency conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:493–1510Google Scholar
  40. Serrien DJ, Strens LHA, Oliviero A, Brown P (2002) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the supplementary motor area (SMA) degrades bimanual movement control in humans. Neurosci Lett 328:89–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Serrien DJ, Cassidy MJ, Brown P (2003) The importance of the dominant hemisphere in the organization of bimanual movements. Hum Brain Mapp 18:296–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shea JB, Morgan RL (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 5:179–187Google Scholar
  43. Stancák A, Svoboda J, Rachmanová R, Vrána J, Králík J, Tintera J (2003) Desynchronization of cortical rhythms following cutaneous stimulation: effects of stimulus repetition and intensity, and of the size of corpus callosum. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1936–1947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Summers JJ (2002) Practice and training in bimanual coordination tasks: strategies and constraints. Brain Cogn 48:66–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Swinnen SP, Young DE, Walter CB, Serrien DJ (1991) Control of asymmetrical bimanual movements. Exp Brain Res 185:163–173Google Scholar
  46. Vangheluwe S, Suy E, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2006) Learning and transfer of bimanual multifrequency patterns: effector-independent and effector-specific levels of movement representation. Exp Brain Res 170:543–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walter CB, Swinnen SP, Corcos DM, Pollatou E, Pan HY (1997) Coping with systematic bias during bilateral movement. Psychol Res 60:202–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wulf G, Lee TD, Schmidt RA (1994) Reduced knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: differential effects on learning. J Mot Behav 26:362–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zanone PG, Kelso JA (1992) Evolution of behavioral attractors with learning: nonequilibrium phase transitions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:403–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations