Switching between gap and overlap pro-saccades: cost or benefit?

  • Marine Vernet
  • Qing Yang
  • Marie Gruselle
  • Mareike Trams
  • Zoï Kapoula
Research Article


Triggering of saccades depends on the task: in the gap task, fixation point switches off and target appears after a gap period; in the overlap task, target appears while fixation point is still on. Saccade latencies are shorter in the gap task, due to fixation disengagement and advanced movement preparation during the gap. The two modes of initiation are also hypothesized to be subtended by different cortical-subcortical circuits. This study tested whether interleaving the two tasks modifies latencies, due to switching between different modes of triggering. Two groups of healthy participants (21–29 vs. 39–55 years) made horizontal and vertical saccades in gap, overlap, and mixed tasks; saccades were recorded with the Eyelink. Both groups showed shorter latencies in the gap task, i.e. a robust gap effect and systematic differences between directions. For young adults, interleaving tasks made the latencies shorter or longer depending on direction, while for middle-age adults, latencies became longer for all directions. Our observations can be explained in the context of models such as that of Brown et al. (Neural Netw 17:471–510, 2004), which proposed that different combinations of frontal eye field (FEF) layers, interacting with cortico-subcortical areas, control saccade triggering in gap and overlap trials. Moreover, we suggest that in early adulthood, the FEF is functioning optimally; frequent changes of activity in the FEF can be beneficial, leading to shorter latencies, at least for some directions. However, for middle-age adults, frequent changes of activity of a less optimally functioning FEF can be time consuming. Studying the alternation of gap and overlap tasks provides a fine tool to explore development, aging and disease.


Saccades Gap Overlap Pure-mixed blocks Switching tasks Cortical control 



The authors thank the reviewers for their comments, Antoine VERNET and Lea-Laetitia PONTANI for improving English in this article.


  1. Barton JJ, Cherkasova MV, Lindgren K, Goff DC, Intriligator JM, Manoach DS (2002) Antisaccades and task switching: studies of control processes in saccadic function in normal subjects and schizophrenic patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 956:250–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton JJ, Greenzang C, Hefter R, Edelman J, Manoach DS (2006) Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm. Exp Brain Res 168:76–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belleville S, Bherer L, Lepage E, Chertkow H, Gauthier S (2008) Task switching capacities in persons with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 46:2225–2233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bojko A, Kramer AF, Peterson MS (2004) Age equivalence in switch costs for prosaccade and antisaccade tasks. Psychol Aging 19:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JW, Bullock D, Grossberg S (2004) How laminar frontal cortex and basal ganglia circuits interact to control planned and reactive saccades. Neural Netw 17:471–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron IG, Watanabe M, Munoz DP (2007) Contrasting instruction change with response change in task switching. Exp Brain Res 182:233–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherkasova MV, Manoach DS, Intriligator JM, Barton JJ (2002) Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing. Exp Brain Res 144:528–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coubard O, Daunys G, Kapoula Z (2004) Gap effects on saccade and vergence latency. Exp Brain Res 154:368–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorris MC, Pare M, Munoz DP (1997) Neuronal activity in monkey superior colliculus related to the initiation of saccadic eye movements. J Neurosci 17:8566–8579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Findlay JM, Walker R (1999) A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behav Brain Sci 22:661–674 discussion 674-721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer B, Weber H, Biscaldi M, Aiple F, Otto P, Stuhr V (1993) Separate populations of visually guided saccades in humans: reaction times and amplitudes. Exp Brain Res 92:528–541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldring J, Fischer B (1997) Reaction times of vertical prosaccades and antisaccades in gap and overlap tasks. Exp Brain Res 113:88–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanes DP, Schall JD (1996) Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science 274:427–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanes DP, Thompson KG, Schall JD (1995) Relationship of presaccadic activity in frontal eye field and supplementary eye field to saccade initiation in macaque: Poisson spike train analysis. Exp Brain Res 103:85–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hikosaka O, Isoda M (2008) Brain mechanisms for switching from automatic to controlled eye movements. Prog Brain Res 171:375–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodgson TL, Golding C, Molyva D, Rosenthal CR, Kennard C (2004) Reflexive, symbolic, and affective contributions to eye movements during task switching: response selection. J Cogn Neurosci 16:318–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Honda H, Findlay JM (1992) Saccades to targets in three-dimensional space: dependence of saccadic latency on target location. Percept Psychophys 52:167–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt AR, Klein RM (2002) Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration. Mem Cognit 30:529–539PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Isa T, Kobayashi Y (2004) Switching between cortical and subcortical sensorimotor pathways. Prog Brain Res 143:299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jersild A (1927) Mental set and shift. Arch Psychol 89:5–82Google Scholar
  21. Johnston K, Everling S (2008) Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of reflexive and voluntary saccades in non-human primates. Brain Cogn 68:271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kingstone A, Klein RM (1993) Visual offsets facilitate saccadic latency: does predisengagement of visuospatial attention mediate this gap effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19:1251–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klein RM, Taylor TL, Kingstone A (1995) Against a role for attentional disengagement in the gap effect: a friendly amendment to Tam and Stelmach (1993). Percept Psychophys 57:573–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (2006) The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Luna B, Thulborn KR, Munoz DP, Merriam EP, Garver KE, Minshew NJ, Keshavan MS, Genovese CR, Eddy WF, Sweeney JA (2001) Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. Neuroimage 13:786–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manoach DS, Lindgren KA, Cherkasova MV, Goff DC, Halpern EF, Intriligator J, Barton JJ (2002) Schizophrenic subjects show deficient inhibition but intact task switching on saccadic tasks. Biol Psychiatry 51:816–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munoz DP, Broughton JR, Goldring JE, Armstrong IT (1998) Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 121:391–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pashler H (2000) Task switching and multitask performance. In: Monsell S, Driver J (eds) Attention and performance XVIII: control of mental processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 277–307Google Scholar
  29. Previc FH (1990) Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13:519–541Google Scholar
  30. Rivaud-Pechoux S, Vidailhet M, Brandel JP, Gaymard B (2007) Mixing pro- and antisaccades in patients with parkinsonian syndromes. Brain 130:256–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rolfs M, Vitu F (2007) On the limited role of target onset in the gap task: support for the motor-preparation hypothesis. J Vis 7:7.1–20Google Scholar
  32. Ross LE, Ross SM (1980) Saccade latency and warning signals: stimulus onset, offset, and change as warning events. Percept Psychophys 27:251–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross SM, Ross LE (1981) Saccade latency and warning signals: effects of auditory and visual stimulus onset and offset. Percept Psychophys 29:429–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Saslow MG (1967) Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement. J Opt Soc Am 57:1024–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schiller PH, Tehovnik EJ (2005) Neural mechanisms underlying target selection with saccadic eye movements. Prog Brain Res 149:157–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slovin H, Abeles M, Vaadia E, Haalman I, Prut Y, Bergman H (1999) Frontal cognitive impairments and saccadic deficits in low-dose MPTP-treated monkeys. J Neurophysiol 81:858–874PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Takagi M, Frohman EM, Zee DS (1995) Gap-overlap effects on latencies of saccades, vergence and combined vergence-saccades in humans. Vision Res 35:3373–3388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tam WJ, Ono H (1994) Fixation disengagement and eye-movement latency. Percept Psychophys 56:251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Tam WJ, Stelmach LB (1993) Viewing behavior: ocular and attentional disengagement. Percept Psychophys 54:211–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tzelepi A, Yang Q, Kapoula Z (2005) The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the latencies of vertical saccades. Exp Brain Res 164:67–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Donkelaar P, Saavedra S, Woollacott M (2007) Multiple saccades are more automatic than single saccades. J Neurophysiol 97:3148–3151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang Q, Bucci MP, Kapoula Z (2002) The latency of saccades, vergence, and combined eye movements in children and in adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2939–2949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang Q, Kapoula Z, Debay E, Coubard O, Orssaud C, Samson M (2006) Prolongation of latency of horizontal saccades in elderly is distance and task specific. Vision Res 46:751–759PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zee DS (2004) Neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-otology. Curr Opin Neurol 17:1–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang M, Barash S (2000) Neuronal switching of sensorimotor transformations for antisaccades. Nature 408:971–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marine Vernet
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qing Yang
    • 1
  • Marie Gruselle
    • 2
  • Mareike Trams
    • 2
  • Zoï Kapoula
    • 1
  1. 1.IRIS Laboratory, CNRS, FRE 3154Service d’ophtalmologie, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (Univ. Paris V)ParisFrance
  2. 2.University of Pierre and Marie Curie (Paris VI)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations