In a multifinger cyclic force production task, the finger force variance measured across trials can be decomposed into two components, one that affects the combined force output (“bad variance”) and one that does not (“good variance”). Previous studies have found similar time patterns of “bad variance” and force rate leading to an approximately linear relationship between them. Based on this finding and a recently developed model of multifinger force production, we expected the “bad variance” during cyclic force production to increase monotonically with the rate of force change, both within a cycle and across trials at different frequencies. Alternatively, “bad variance” could show a dependence on task frequency, not on actual force derivative values. Healthy subjects were required to produce cyclic force patterns to prescribed targets by pressing on unidimensional force sensors, at a frequency set by a metronome. The task was performed with only the index finger, and with all four fingers. In the task with all four fingers, the “good variance” increased approximately linearly with an increase in the force magnitude. The “bad variance” showed within-a-cycle modulation similar to that of the force rate. However, an increase in the frequency did not lead to an increase in the “bad variance” that could be expected based on the natural relationships between action frequency and the rate of force change modulation. The results have been interpreted in the framework of an earlier model of multifinger force production where “bad variance” is a result of variance of the timing parameter. The unexpected lack of modulation of the “bad variance” with frequency suggests a drop in variance of the timing parameter with increased frequency. This mechanism may serve to maintain a constant acceptable level of variance under different conditions.
Force Hand Synergy Variance Uncontrolled manifold hypothesis
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The study was in part supported by NIH grants AG-018751, NS-035032, and AR-048563.
Danion F, Schöner G, Latash ML, Li S, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks. Biol Cybern 88:91–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman SR, Shim JK, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) Motor variability within a multi-effector system: experimental and analytical studies of multi-finger production of quick force pulses. Exp Brain Res 163:75–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorniak SL, Duarte M, Latash ML (2008) Do synergies improve accuracy? A study of speed accuracy trade-offs during finger force production. Motor Control 12:151–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hogan N, Sternad D (2007) On rhythmic and discrete movements: reflections, definitions and implications for motor control. Exp Brain Res 181:13–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivry RB, Hazeltine RE (1995) Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:3–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schöner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86:29–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapkova EYu, Shapkova AL, Goodman SR, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) Do synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 188:411–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shim JK, Lay B, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2004) Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. J Appl Physiol 97:213–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar