Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 194, Issue 3, pp 369–380 | Cite as

Cerebral cortical mechanisms of copying geometrical shapes: a multidimensional scaling analysis of fMRI patterns of activation

  • Charidimos Tzagarakis
  • Trenton A. Jerde
  • Scott M. Lewis
  • Kâmil Uğurbil
  • Apostolos P. Georgopoulos
Research Article

Abstract

We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) to characterize the integrative neural mechanisms during viewing and subsequently copying nine geometrical shapes. Human subjects initially looked at a central fixation point (“rest” period), then looked at a geometrical shape (“visual” period) which they copied without visual feedback (“copying” period). BOLD signal was recorded from voxels in 28 cortical areas (14 from each hemisphere) using a 4 Tesla magnet. For each voxel, signal ratios of “Visual versus Rest” (VR), and “Copy versus Visual” (CV) were calculated and used to construct two sets of Euclidean distance dissimilarity matrices for the nine shapes, with separate matrices defined for each region of interest (ROI) across subjects. The relations of perceptual and motor aspects of the shapes to MDS dimensions and specific ROIs were assessed using stepwise multiple regressions. The optimal individually scaled (INDSCAL) solutions were 2-dimensional. For the VR condition, MDS dimensions were significantly associated with the presence of crossing in a shape (Dimension 1), and with perimeter, height, cycles, peak segment speed, and horizontal symmetry (Dimension 2). ROIs most prominently associated with these dimensions essentially comprised the medial frontal lobe bilaterally, the inferior frontal gyrus bilaterally, and the left intraparietal sulcus (Dimension 1), and visual areas, including the calcarine sulcus and cuneus bilaterally (Dimension 2). These results document the expected involvement of visual areas and support the hypothesis advanced on the basis of previous findings (Lewis et al. 2003a) that a motor rehearsal of the upcoming shape copying is occurring during this visual presentation period. For the CV condition, practically one motor feature (number of segments drawn) dominated both dimensions, with a secondary engagement of horizontal symmetry in Dimension 1. The right postcentral gyrus, right intraparietal sulcus, right superior parietal lobule and right inferior parietal lobule contributed mostly to Dimension 1; the superior frontal gyrus bilaterally, right middle frontal gyrus, left postcentral gyrus, left inferior parietal lobule contributed mostly to Dimension 2; and the left superior parietal lobule and left intraparietal sulcus contributed to both dimensions approximately equally. CV BOLD activation of ROIs contributing to Dimension 1 (or to both dimensions) was significantly associated with the number of shape segments drawn. Since the direction of movement differs in successively drawn shape segments, the number of segments (minus one) equals the number of changes in the direction of movement. We conclude that this fundamental spatial motor aspect of drawing geometrical shapes is the critical variable, independent of the particular shape drawn, that dominates cortical activation during copying.

Keywords

Fmri Multidimensional scaling Copying Cerebral cortex 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Joshua Lynch for data preprocessing and Marc Coutanche for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by US NIH grant NS32919, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, and the American Legion Chair in Brain Sciences.

References

  1. Angelini R, Frasca R, Grossi D (1992) Are patients with constructional disorders different in visuo-spatial abilities? Acta Neurol 14:595–604Google Scholar
  2. Arabie P, Carroll JD, DeSarbo WS (1987) Three-way scaling and clustering. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  3. Averbeck BB, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, Georgopoulos AP (2002) Parallel processing of serial movements in prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13172–13177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Averbeck BB, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, Georgopoulos AP (2003a) Neural activity in prefrontal cortex during copying geometrical shapes. I. Single cells encode shape, sequence, and metric parameters. Exp Brain Res 150:127–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Averbeck BB, Crowe DA, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, Georgopoulos AP (2003b) Neural activity in prefrontal cortex during copying geometrical shapes II. Decoding shape segments from neural ensembles. Exp Brain Res 150:142–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Averbeck BB, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, Georgopoulos AP (2005) Parietal representation of hand velocity in a copy task. J Neurophysiol 93:508–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Averbeck BB, Crowe DA, Chafee MV, Crowe DA, Georgopoulos AP (2008) Differential contribution of superior parietal and dorsal-lateral prefrontal cortices in copying. Cortex [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  8. Behrmann M, Winocur G, Moscovitch M (1992) Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient. Nature 359:636–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benson DF, Barton MI (1970) Disturbances in constructional ability. Cortex 6:19–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Benton AL (1962) The visual retention test as a constructional praxis task. Confin Neurol 22:141–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benton AL (1967) Constructional apraxia and the minor hemisphere. Confin Neurol 29:1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Benton AL (1968) Differential behavioral effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia 6:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carroll D, Chang J (1970) Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition. Psychometrika 35:283–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox RW, Jesmanowicz A (1999) Real-time 3d image registration for functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:1014–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Renzi E (1982) Disorders of space exploration and cognition. Wiley, Baffins LaneGoogle Scholar
  16. Deiber MP, Ibañez V, Sadato N, Hallett M (1996) Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol 75:233–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gainotti G (1985) Constructional apraxia. In: Frederiks JAM (ed) Handbook of clinical neurology. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 491–506Google Scholar
  18. Georgopoulos AP (1999) Neural mechanisms of motor cognitive processes: functional MRI and neurophysiological studies. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The new cognitive neurosciences 2nd edn. MIT, Cambridge, pp 525–538Google Scholar
  19. Grossi D, Orsini A, Modafferi A, Liotti M (1986) Visuoimaginal constructional apraxia: on a case of selective deficit of imagery. Brain Cogn 5:255–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kherif F, Poline JB, Mériaux S, Benali H, Flandin G, Brett M (2003) Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures. Neuroimage 20:2197–2208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim SG, Hendrich K, Hu X, Merkle H, Uğurbil K (1994) Potential pitfalls of functional MRI using conventional gradient-recalled echo techniques. NMR biomed 7:69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleist K (1934) Gehirnpathologie. Barth, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  23. Koski L, Iacoboni M, Mazziotta JC (2002) Deconstructing apraxia: understanding disorders of intentional movement after stroke. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krams M, Rushworth MFS, Deiber M-P, Frackowiak RSJ, Passingham RE (1998) The preparation, execution and suppression of copied movements in the human brain. Exp Brain Res 120:386–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional scaling. SAGE, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  26. Laeng B (2006) Constructional apraxia after left or right unilateral stroke. Neuropsychologia 44:1595–1606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis SM, Jerde TA, Tzagarakis C, Georgopoulos MA, Tsekos N, Amirikian B, Kim SG, Uğurbil K, Georgopoulos AP (2003a) Cerebellar activation during copying geometrical shapes. J Neurophysiol 90:3874–3887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis SM, Jerde TA, Tzagarakis C, Tsekos N, Amirikian B, Georgopoulos MA, Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP (2003b) Activation in the frontal and parietal lobes during performance of a copy task: an fMRI study. Soc Neurosci Abstr 620:1Google Scholar
  29. Lewis SM, Jerde TA, Tzagarakis C, Gourtzelidis P, Georgopoulos MA, Tsekos N, Amirikian B, Kim SG, Uğurbil K, Georgopoulos AP (2005) Logarithmic transformation for high-field BOLD fMRI data. Exp Brain Res 165:447–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukashin AV, Georgopoulos AP (1994) A neural network for coding of trajectories by time series of neuronal population vectors. Neural Comput 6:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lukashin AV, Wilcox GL, Georgopoulos AP (1994) Overlapping neural networks for multiple motor engrams. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:8651–8654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luria AR, Tsvetkova LS (1964) The programming of constructive activity in local brain injuries. Neuropsychologia 2:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacCallum R (1977) Effects of conditionality on indscal and alscal weights. Psychometrika 42:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mack JL, Levine RN (1981) The basis of visual constructional disability in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex 17:515–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Makuuchi M, Kaminaga T, Sugishita M (2003) Both parietal lobes are involved in drawing: a functional MRI study and implications for constructional apraxia. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16:338–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marchini JL, Ripley BD (2000) A new statistical approach to detecting significant activation in functional MRI. Neuroimage 12:366–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osterrieth PA (1944) Le test de copie d’une figure complexe: contribution à l’étude de la perception et de la mémoire. Archives de Psychologie 30:206–356Google Scholar
  39. Paus T, Petrides M, Evans AC, Meyer E (1993) Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurophysiol 70:453–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Piercy M, Hécaen H, Ajuriaguerra J (1960) Constructional apraxia associated with unilateral cerebral lesions. Left and right sided cases compared. Brain 83:225–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pillon B (1981) Troubles visuoconstructifs et methods de compensation: Resultats de 85 patients atteints de lesions cerebrales. Neuropsychologia 19:375–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poppelreuter W (1917) Die psychische Schadigungen durch Kopfschuss im Kriege, vol 1. Leipzig, VossGoogle Scholar
  43. Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, Diamond ME, Baraldi P, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M, di Prampero PE (1996) Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 16:7688–7698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Porteus SD (1965) The Porteus maze test; 50 years’ application. Pacific books, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  45. Rey A (1941) Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy. Archives de Psychologie 28:286–340Google Scholar
  46. Salvador R, Suckling J, Coleman MR, Pickard JD, Menon D, Bullmore E (2005) Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereb Cortex 15:1332–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartz AB (1994) Direct cortical representation of drawing. Science 265:540–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strupp JP (1996) Stimulate: a gui based fMRI analysis software package. Neuroimage 3:S607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suchan B, Yaguez L, Wunderlich G, Canavan AG, Herzog H, Tellmann L, Homberg V, Seitz RJ (2002) Neural correlates of visuospatial imagery. Behav Brain Res 131:163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tagaris GA, Richter W, Kim SG, Pellizzer G, Andersen P, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP (1998) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of mental rotation and memory scanning: a multidimensional scaling analysis of brain activation patterns. Brain Res Rev 26:106–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner RS, Grafton ST, Votaw JR, Delong MR, Hoffman JM (1998) Motor subcircuits mediating the control of movement velocity: a pet study. J Neurophysiol 80:2162–2176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience 7:431–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Welchew DE, Honey GD, Sharma T, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET (2002) Multidimensional scaling of integrated neurocognitive function and schizophrenia as a disconnexion disorder. Neuroimage 17:1227–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Welchew DE, Ashwin C, Berkouk K, Salvador R, Suckling J, Baron-Cohen S, Bullmore E (2005) Functional disconnectivity of the medial temporal lobe in Asperger’s syndrome. Biol Psychiatry 57:991–998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Young FW, Harris DF (1990) Multidimensional scaling: procedure ALSCAL. In SPSS base system user’s guide. SPSS, Chicago, pp 397–461Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charidimos Tzagarakis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Trenton A. Jerde
    • 1
    • 3
  • Scott M. Lewis
    • 1
    • 4
  • Kâmil Uğurbil
    • 5
  • Apostolos P. Georgopoulos
    • 1
    • 4
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Brain Sciences Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center (11B)MinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.NIHR and Department of PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  5. 5.Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of RadiologyUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  6. 6.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  7. 7.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Minnesota Medical SchoolMinneapolisUSA
  8. 8.Center for Cognitive SciencesUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations