Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 193, Issue 3, pp 371–385 | Cite as

An analytical formulation of the law of intersegmental coordination during human locomotion

  • Avi Barliya
  • Lars Omlor
  • Martin A. Giese
  • Tamar Flash
Research Article

Abstract

The law of intersegmental coordination is a kinematic law that describes the coordination patterns among the elevation angles of the lower limb segments during locomotion (Borghese et al. in J Physiol 494:863–879, 1996). This coordination pattern reduces the number of degrees of freedom of the lower limb to two, i.e. the elevation angles covary along a plane in angular space. The properties of the plane that constrains the time course of the elevation angles have been extensively studied, and its orientation was found to be correlated with gait velocity and energy expenditure (Bianchi et al. in J Neurophysiol 79:2155–2170, 1998). Here, we present a mathematical model that represents the rotations of the elevation angles in terms of simple oscillators with appropriate phase shifts between them. The model explains what requirements the time courses of the elevation angles must fulfill in order for the angular covariation relationship to be planar. Moreover, an analytical formulation is proposed for both the orientation of the plane and for the eccentricity of the nearly elliptical shape that is generated within this plane, in terms of the amplitudes and relative phases of the first harmonics of the segments elevation angles. The model presented here sheds some new light on the possible interactions among the Central Pattern Generators possibly underlying the control of biped locomotion. The model precisely specifies how any two segments in the limb interact, and how a change in gait velocity affects the orientation of the intersegmental coordination plane mainly through a change in phase shifts between the segments. Implications of this study with respect to neural control of locomotion and other motor activities are discussed.

Keywords

Locomotion Law of intersegmental covariation CPGs Motor control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the HFSP Grant # RGP0054/2004-C and by a grant from the European Commission (COBOL). The Tuebingen team was also supported by the Volkswagenstiftung. Tamar Flash is the incumbent of the Dr. Hymie Moross Professorial Chair.

Supplementary material

221_2008_1633_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (250 kb)
Supplementary Appendix (PDF 249 kb)

References

  1. Anton H (1994) Elementary linear algebra, 7th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 483–493Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi L, Angelini D, Orani GP, Lacquaniti F (1998) Kinematic coordination in human gait: relation to mechanical energy cost. J Neurophysiol 79:2155–2170PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Borghese NA, Bianchi L, Lacquaniti F (1996) Kinematic determinants of human locomotion. J Physiol 494:863–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Capaday C (2002) The special nature of human walking and its neural control. Trends Neurosic 25(7):370–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheron G, Bouillot E, Dan B, Bengoetxea A, Draye J-P, Lacquaniti F (2001) Development of a kinetic coordination pattern in toddler locomotion: planar covariation. Exp Brain Res 137:455–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Courtine G, Schiepati M (2004) Tuning of basic coordination pattern constructs straight-ahead and curved walking in humans. J Neurophysiol 91:1524–1535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delcomyn F (1980) Neural basis of rhythmic behavior in animals. Science 210(31):492–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duysens J, Van de Crommert HWAA (1998) Neural control of locomotion; Part 1: the central pattern generator from cats to humans. Gait Posture 7:131–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grillner S (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish. In: Handbook of physiology, the nervous system. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1179–1236Google Scholar
  10. Grillner S (1996) Neural networks for vertebrate locomotion. Sci Am 274(1):64–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grillner S, Wallen P, Brodin L, Lansner A (1991) Neuronal network generating locomotor behavior in lamprey: circuitry, transmitters, membrane properties, and simulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 14:169–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hicheur H, Terekhov AV, Berthoz A (2006) Intersegmental coordination during human locomotion: does planar covariation of elevation angles reflect central constraints? J Neurophysiol 96:1406–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ivanenko YP, Grasso R, Macellari V, Lacquaniti F (2002) Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simultaed reduced gravity. J Neurophysiol 87:3070–3089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ivanenko YP, Dominici N, Cappellini G, Lacquaniti F (2005a) Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability. J Neurophysiol 94:754–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivanenko YP, Cappelini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2005b) Coordination of locomotion with voluntary movements in humans. J Neurosci 25:7238–7253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivanenko YP, Cappelini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2007) Modular control of limb movements during human locomotion. J Neurophysiol 27:11149–11161Google Scholar
  17. Ivanenko YP, d’Avella A, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2008) On the origin of planar covariation of elevation angles during human locomotion. J Neurophysiol 99:1890–1898Google Scholar
  18. Lacquaniti F, Grasso R, Zago M (1999) Motor patterns in walking. News Physiol Sci 14:168–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Marker Placement Protocols [Online] (2006) Biomechanics Research Group, Inc. http://www.lifemodeler.com/LM_Manual/A_motion.htm 30 March 2006
  20. Mussa-Ivaldi F, Solla S (2004) Neural primitives for motion control. IEEE J Ocean Eng 29:640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearson KG (1993) Common principles of motor control in vertebrates and invertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 16:265–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pearson KG (2000) Neural adaptation in the generation of rhythmic behavior. Annu Rev Physiol 62:723–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taga G, Yamaguchi Y, Shimizu H (1991) Self-organized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment. Biol Cybern 65:147–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O’Connor JC (1999) Dynamics of human gait, 2nd edn. Kiboho publishers, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  25. Yefimov NV (1964) Quadratic forms and matrices. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–27Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avi Barliya
    • 1
  • Lars Omlor
    • 2
  • Martin A. Giese
    • 2
  • Tamar Flash
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Applied MathematicsWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsreal
  2. 2.Section of Computational SensomotoricsHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Integrative NeurosciencesTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations