Experimental Brain Research

, 193:267 | Cite as

The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states

Research Article


The paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm is increasingly employed to examine intracortical inhibitory processes in different motor tasks. Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) has been shown to vary with the size of the MEP elicited by the test TMS pulse. This suggests that factors that alter MEP size, such as changes in cortical excitability, may confound the interpretation of SICI. However, the effect of excitability on SICI has not been systematically investigated. The present study examined SICI in 11 volunteers. The effect of test TMS intensities ranging from 90 to 150% resting motor threshold (RMT) on SICI was examined in three excitability states in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle: rest, isometric abduction of the left index finger (Contra) and isometric abduction of the right index finger (Active). For all excitability states SICI was not observed when test TMS intensity was less than 110% resting motor threshold. This was true even for the Active condition in which 90 and 100% test TMS intensities elicited large and consistent MEPs. For all conditions moderately suprathreshold test TMS intensities (110–120% RMT) yielded the greatest measure of SICI; increasing test TMS intensities resulted in a progressive reduction in the estimate of SICI. These results suggest that estimates of SICI are systematically affected by the intensity of the test TMS pulse, regardless of excitability state. The results suggest that SICI should be examined using a constant test TMS intensity regardless of changes in cortical excitability and test MEP size.


Intracortical inhibition SICI Excitability Test intensity 



The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This research was funded by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (435708).


  1. Benwell NM, Sacco P, Hammond GR, Byrnes ML, Mastaglia FL, Thickbroom GW (2006) Short-interval cortical inhibition and corticomotor excitability with fatiguing hand exercise: a central adaptation to fatigue? Exp Brain Res 170:191–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Byblow WD, Stinear CM (2006) Modulation of short-latency intracortical inhibition in human primary motor cortex during synchronised versus syncopated finger movements. Exp Brain Res 168:287–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen R, Tam A, Butefisch C, Corwell B, Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Cohen LG (1998) Intracortical inhibition and facilitation in different representations of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 80:2870–2881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Coxon JP, Stinear CM, Byblow WD (2006) Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action. J Neurophysiol 95:3371–3383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curran-Everett D (2000) Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279:R1–R8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Daskalakis ZJ, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Roshan L, Chen R (2002) The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 543:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Meglio M, Cioni B, Tamburrini G, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (2000) Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 111:794–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (1998a) Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans. J Physiol (Lond) 508:625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (1998b) Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 119:265–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garry MI, Kamen G, Nordstrom MA (2004) Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning. J Neurophysiol 91:1570–1578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ (2005) Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res 163:118–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang SY, Shin HW, Sohn YH (2007) Different modulation of the cortical silent period by two phases of short interval intracortical inhibition. Yonsei Med J 48:795–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 471:501–519Google Scholar
  14. Liang N, Murakami T, Funase K, Narita T, Kasai T (2008) Further evidence for excitability changes in human primary motor cortex during ipsilateral voluntary contractions. Neurosci Lett 433:135–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsunaga K, Maruyama A, Fujiwara T, Nakanishi R, Tsuji S, Rothwell JC (2005) Increased corticospinal excitability after 5 Hz rTMS over the human supplementary motor area. J Physiol (Lond) 562:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC (2004) The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 561:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roshan L, Paradiso GO, Chen R (2003) Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition. Exp Brain Res 151:330–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanger TD, Garg RR, Chen R (2001) Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 530:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sinclair C, Hammond GR (2008) Reduced intracorticfal inhibition during the foreperiod of a warned reaction time task. Exp Brain Res 186:385–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stedman A, Davey NJ, Ellaway PH (1998) Facilitation of human first dorsal interosseous muscle responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during voluntary contraction of the contralateral homonymous muscle. Muscle Nerve 21:1033–1039PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stefan K, Classen J, Celnik P, Cohen LG (2008a) Concurrent action observation modulates practice-induced motor memory formation. Eur J Neurosci 27:730–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stefan K, Gentner R, Zeller D, Dang SY, Classen J (2008b) Theta-burst stimulation: remote physiological and local behavioral after-effects. Neuroimage 40:265–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomson RHS, Garry MI, Summers JJ (2008) Attentional influences on short-interval intracortical inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 119:52–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weise D, Schramm A, Stefan K, Wolters A, Reiners K, Naumann M, Classen J (2006) The two sides of associative plasticity in writer’s cramp. Brain 129:2709–2721PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zoghi M, Nordstrom MA (2007) Progressive suppression of intracortical inhibition during graded isometric contraction of a hand muscle is not influenced by hand preference. Exp Brain Res 177:266–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zoghi M, Pearce SL, Nordstrom MA (2003) Differential modulation of intracortical inhibition in human motor cortex during selective activation of an intrinsic hand muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 550:933–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Movement and Neuroscience (HuMAN) Laboratory, School of PsychologyUniversity of TasmaniaHobartTASAustralia

Personalised recommendations