Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 192, Issue 3, pp 307–319 | Cite as

Neuronal plasticity: historical roots and evolution of meaning

  • G. Berlucchi
  • H. A. Buchtel
Review

Abstract

In this paper, we outline some important milestones in the history of the term “plasticity” in reference to the nervous system. Credit is given to William James for first adopting the term to denote changes in nervous paths associated with the establishment of habits; to Eugenio Tanzi for first identifying the articulations between neurons, not yet called synapses, as possible sites of neural plasticity; to Ernesto Lugaro for first linking neural plasticity with synaptic plasticity; and to Cajal for complementing Tanzi’s hypothesis with his own hypothesis of plasticity as the result of the formation of new connections between cortical neurons. Cajal’s early use of the word plasticity is demonstrated, and his subsequent avoidance of the term is tentatively accounted for by the fact that other authors extended it to mean neuronal reactions partly pathological and no doubt quite different from those putatively associated with normal learning. Evidence is furnished that in the first two decades of the twentieth century the theory was generally accepted that learning is based on a reduced resistance at exercized synapses, and that neural processes become associated by coactivation. Subsequently the theory fell in disgrace when Lashley’s ideas about mass action and functional equipotentiality of the cortex tended to outmode models of the brain based on orthodox neural circuitry. The synaptic plasticity theory of learning was rehabilitated in the late 1940s when Konorski and particularly Hebb argued successfully that there was no better alternative way to think about the modifiability of the brain by experience and practice. Hebb’s influential hypothesis about the mechanism of adult learning contained elements strikingly similar to the early speculations of James, Tanzi and Cajal, but Hebb did not acknowledge specifically these roots of his thinking about the brain, though he was fully aware that he had resurrected old ideas wrongly neglected for a long time. Lately the concept of neural plasticity has been complicated by attributing considerably different meanings to it. A scholarly paper by Paillard is used to show how an analysis in depth can clarify some confusion engendered by an unrestricted use of the concept and term of neural plasticity.

Keywords

Neuronal plasticity Behaviour Learning Synaptic modifiability Neural path resistance 

References

  1. Allin A (1896) Psychological literature. Am J Psychol 7:428–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansermet F, Magistretti P (2007) Biology of freedom: neural plasticity, experience and the unconscious. Karnac Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bawden HH (1900) A digest and a criticism of the data upon which is based the theory of the amoeboid movements of the neurone. J Comp Neurol 10:243–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berlucchi G (1990) Commissurotomy studies in animals. In: Boller F, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 9–47Google Scholar
  5. Berlucchi G (1999) Some aspects of the history of the law of dynamic polarization of the neuron. From William James to Sherrington, from Cajal and van Gehuchten to Golgi. J Hist Neurosci 8:191–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlucchi G (2002) The origin of the term plasticity in the neurosciences: Ernesto Lugaro and chemical synaptic transmission. J Hist Neurosci 11:305–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bethe A (1925) Altes und Neues über die Plastizität des Nervensystems. Arch Psychol 76:81–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bethe A (1931) Plastizität und Zentrenlehre. In: Bethe A, v.Bergman G, Embden G, Ellinger A (eds) Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie, Band 15, II Hälfte. Springer, Berlin, pp 1175–1220Google Scholar
  9. Bethe A, Fischer E (1931) Die Anpassungfähigkeit (Plastizität) des Nervensystems. In: Bethe A, v.Bergman G, Embden G, Ellinger A (eds) Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie, Band 15, II Hälfte, Springer, Berlin, pp.1045–1130Google Scholar
  10. Buchtel HA (1978) On defining neural plasticity. Arch Ital Biol 116:241–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Centonze D, Siracusano A, Calabresi P, Bernardi G (2004) The project for a scientific psychology (1895): a Freudian anticipation of LTP-memory connection theory. Brain Res Rev 46:310–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coghill GE (1926) The growth of functional neurones and its relation to the development of behavior. Proc Am Philos Soc 65:51–55Google Scholar
  13. Cooke SF, Bliss TVP (2006) Plasticity in the central nervous system. Brain 129:1659–1673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper SJ (2005) Donald O.Hebb’s synapse and learning rule: a history and commentary. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:851–874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowan WM, Kandel ER (2001) A brief history of synapses and synaptic transmission. In: Cowan WM, Südhof TC, Stevens CF (eds) Synapses. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 1–87Google Scholar
  16. DeFelipe J (2006) Brain plasticity and mental processes: Cajal again. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:811–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeFelipe J, Jones EG (1988) Cajal on the cerebral cortex. An annotated translation of the complete writings. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. DeFelipe J, Jones EG (1991) Cajal’s degeneration and regeneration of the nervous system. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Demoor J (1896) La plasticité morphologique des neurones cérébraux. Arch Biol (Bruxelles) 14:723–751Google Scholar
  20. Demoor J (1905) Plasticité ou amiboïsme des neurones. Arch int Physiol 3:426–452Google Scholar
  21. Duval M (1895) Hypothèses sur la physiologie des centres nerveux: théorie histologique du sommeil. C R Soc Biol 47:71–77Google Scholar
  22. Glickstein M, Berlucchi G (2008) Classical disconnection studies of the corpus callosum. Cortex 44:914–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein K. (1931) Über die Plastizität des Organismus auf Grund von Erfahrungen am nervenkranken Menschen. In: Bethe A, v.Bergman G, Embden G, Ellinger A (eds) Handbuch der normalen und pathologischen Physiologie, Band 15, II Hälfte, Springer, Berlin, pp 1131–1174Google Scholar
  24. Hebb DO (1949) The organization of behaviour. A neuropsychological theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Hebb DO (1958) Alice in wonderland or psychology among the biological sciences. In: Harlow HF, Woolsey CN (eds) Biological and Biochemical Bases of Behavior. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 451–466Google Scholar
  26. Herrick CJ (1926) Brains of rats and men. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. James W (1890) Principles of psychology, 2 vols. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansson BB (2004) Brain plasticity in health and disease. Keio J Med 53:231–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones EG (2000) NEUROwords. 8. Plasticity and neuroplasticity. J Hist Neurosci 9:37–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones EG (2004) Plasticity and neuroplasticity. J Hist Neurosci 13:293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Konorski J (1948) Conditioned reflexes and neuron organization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Lashley KS (1924) Studies of cerebral function in learning. VI. The theory that synaptic resistance is reduced by the passage of the nerve impulse. Psychol Rev 31:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lorente de Nó (1939) Transmission of impulses through cranial motor nuclei. J Neurphysiol 2:402–464Google Scholar
  34. Lugaro E (1898a) Le resistenze nell’evoluzione della vita. Rivista moderna di cultura 1:29–60Google Scholar
  35. Lugaro E (1898b) Sulle modificazioni morfologiche funzionali dei dendriti delle cellule nervose. Riv Patol Nerv Ment 3:337–359Google Scholar
  36. Lugaro E (1906) I problemi odierni della psichiatria. Sandron, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  37. Lugaro E (1909) Modern problems in psychiatry. Translated by D Orr and RG Rows. The University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  38. Marinesco G (1909) La cellule nerveuse, vol 2 vol. Doin et fils, ParisGoogle Scholar
  39. McDougall W (1905) Physiological psychology. The Temple Primers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Mercado EIII (2008) Neural and cognitive plasticity: from maps to mind. Psychol Bull 134:109–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meyer M (1912) The present status of the problem of the relation between mind and body. J Philos Psychol Sci Meth 9:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Møller AR (2006) Neural plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Mosso A (1880) Sulla circolazione del sangue nel cervello dell’uomo. Mem R Acad Lincei 5:237–358Google Scholar
  44. Paillard J (1976) Réflexions sur l’usage du concept de plasticité en neurobiologie. J Psychol 1:33–47 [see Will et al. (2008) for a translation with comments]Google Scholar
  45. Pascual-Leone A, Amedi A, Fregni F, Merabet LB (2005) The plastic human brain cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:377–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pillsbury WB (1911) The essentials of psychology. The MacMillan Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramón y Cajal S (1893) Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems. Arch Anat Physiol Anat Abth 319–428Google Scholar
  48. Ramón y Cajal S (1894a) La fine structure des centres nerveux. Proc Roy Soc London 55:444–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ramón y Cajal S (1894b) Allgemeine Betrachtungen über die Morphologie der Nervenzelle. Arch Anat Physiol Anat Abth 187–201Google Scholar
  50. Ramón y Cajal S (1895) Einige Hypothesen über den anatomischen Mechanismus der Ideenbildung, der Association und der Aufmerksamkeit. Arch Anat Physiol Anat Abth 367–378Google Scholar
  51. Ramón y Cajal S (1911) Histologie du Système Nerveux de l’Homme et des Vertébrés. tome II. Maloine, ParisGoogle Scholar
  52. Schiefferdecker P (1906) Neurone und Neuronenbahnen. Barth, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  53. Sherrington CS (1897) The central nervous system. In: Foster M (ed) Text-book of physiology, vol vol.3. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Sherrington CS (1900) The spinal cord. In: Schäfer EA (ed) Text book of physiology. Caxton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Sherrington CS (1906) The integrative action of the nervous system. Constable, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Sherrington CS (1909) On plastic tonus and proprioceptive reflexes. Q J Exp Physiol 2:109–156Google Scholar
  57. Sperry RW (1953) On the neural basis of the conditioned response. Br J Anim Behav 111:41–44Google Scholar
  58. Sperry RW (1961) Cerebral organization and behavior. Science 133:1749–1757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stahnisch FW, Nitsch R (2002) Santiago Ramón y Cajal’s concept of neuronal plasticity: the ambiguity lives on. Trends Neurosci 25:589–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tanzi E (1893) I fatti e le induzioni dell’odierna istologia del sistema nervoso. Riv Sper Fren Med Leg 19:419–472Google Scholar
  61. Vital-Durand F, Jeannerod M (1975) Aspects of neural plasticity (plasticité nerveuse). INSERM, ParisGoogle Scholar
  62. Will B, Dalrymple-Alford J, Wolff M, Cassel J-C (2008) The concept of brain plasticity—Paillard’s systemic analysis and emphasis on structure and function (followed by the translation of a seminal paper by Paillard on plasticity). Behav Brain Res 192:2–7 (translation: 192:7–11)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yuste R, Bonhoeffer T (2001) Morphological changes in dendritic spines associated with long-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1071–1089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zilles K (1992) Neuronal plasticity as an adaptive property of the central nervous system. Ann Anat 174:383–391PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neural and Visual SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.National Institute of NeuroscienceVeronaItaly
  3. 3.VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System and the University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations