Chronotype and time-of-day influences on the alerting, orienting, and executive components of attention
- 2k Downloads
Recent research on attention has identified three separable components, known as alerting, orienting, and executive functioning, which are thought to be subserved by distinct neural networks. Despite systematic investigation into their relatedness to each other and to psychopathology, little is known about how these three networks might be modulated by such factors as time-of-day and chronotype. The present study administered the Attentional Network Test (ANT) and a self-report measure of alertness to 80 participants at 0800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 hours on the same day. Participants were also chronotyped with a morningness/eveningness questionnaire and divided into evening versus morning/neither-type groups; morning chronotypes tend to perform better early in the day, while evening chronotypes show enhanced performance later in the day. The results replicated the lack of any correlations between alerting, orienting, and executive functioning, supporting the independence of these three networks. There was an effect of time-of-day on executive functioning with higher conflict scores at 1200 and 1600 hours for both chronotypes. The efficiency of the orienting system did not change as a function of time-of-day or chronotype. The alerting measure, however, showed an interaction between time-of-day and chronotype such that alerting scores increased only for the morning/neither-type participants in the latter half of the day. There was also an interaction between time-of-day and chronotype for self-reported alertness, such that it increased during the first half of the day for all participants, but then decreased for morning/neither types (only) toward evening. This is the first report to examine changes in the trinity of attentional networks measured by the ANT throughout a normal day in a large group of normal participants, and it encourages more integration between chronobiology and cognitive neuroscience for both theoretical and practical reasons.
KeywordsAlertness Attention Chronotype Conflict Diurnal Eveningness Morningness Time-of-day
We would like to thank Owen Camuso, Jessica Leer, and William Rusnak for their assistance with data collection.
- Bombin I, Arango C, Mayoral M, Castro-Fornieles J, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Gonzalez-Gomez C, Moreno D, Parellada M, Baeza I, Graell M, Otero S, Saiz PA, Patiño-Garcia A (2008) DRD3, but not COMT or DRD2, genotype affects executive functions in healthy and first-episode psychosis adolescents. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147:873–879Google Scholar
- Espeseth T, Greenwood PM, Reinvang I, Fjell AM, Walhovd KB, Westlye LT, Wehling E, Lundervold A, Rootwelt H, Parasuraman R (2006) Interactive effects of APOE and CHRNA4 on attention and white matter volume in healthy middle-aged and older adults. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6:31–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 16:143–149Google Scholar
- Folkard S (1983) Diurnal variation in human performance. In: Hockey GRJ (ed) Stress and fatigue in human performance. Wiley, Chichester, pp 245–272Google Scholar
- Horne JA, Ostberg O (1976) Self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronbiol 4:179–190Google Scholar
- Kleitman N (1963) Sleep and wakefulness. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Parasuraman R, Warm JS, See JE (1998) Brain systems of vigilance. In: Parasuraman R (ed) The attentive brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 221–256Google Scholar
- Refinetti R (2006) Circadian Physiology, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar