Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 191, Issue 4, pp 403–418 | Cite as

The use of predictive information is impaired in the actions of children and young adults with Developmental Coordination Disorder

Research Article


The need for a movement response may often be preceded by some advance information regarding direction or extent. We examined the ability of individuals with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) to organise a movement in response to advance information. Pre-cues were presented and varied in the extent to which they indicated the response target. Both eye movement latencies and hand movements were measured. In the absence of pre-cues, individuals with DCD were as fast in initial hand movements as the typically developing (TD) participants, but were less efficient at correcting initial directional errors. A major difference was seen in the degree to which each group could use advance pre-cue information. TD participants were able to use pre-cue information to refine their actions. For the individuals with DCD this was only effective if there was no ambiguity in the advance cue and they had particular difficulty in using predictive motion cues. There were no differences in the speed of gaze responses which excluded an explanation relating to the dynamic allocation of attention. Individuals with DCD continued to rely on the slower strategy of fixating the target prior to initiating a hand movement, rather than using advance information to set initial movement parameters.


Developmental Coordination Disorder Reach-and-grasp Predictive information Motion cues Paramertization of movement 


  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn edn. APA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Annett M (1970) The growth of manual performance and speed. Br J Psychol 61:545–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bairstow PJ (1987) Analysis of hand movement to moving targets. Hum Mov Sci 6:205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bairstow PJ (1989) Development of planning and control of hand movements to moving target. Br J Dev Psychol 7:29–42Google Scholar
  5. Bairstow PJ, Laszlo JI (1989) Deficits in the planning, control and recall of hand movements in children with perceptuo-motor dysfunction. Br J Dev Psychol 7:251–273Google Scholar
  6. Braddick OJ, O’Brien JMD, Wattam-Bell J, Atkinson J, Turner R (2000) Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain. Curr Biol 10:731–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112(1):155–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Estil LB, Ingvaldsen RP, Whiting HTA (2002) Spatial and temporal constraints on performance in children with movement coordination problems. Exp Brain Res 147:153–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Field A (2006) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edn edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Gordon N, McKinlay S (1980) Helping clumsy children. Churchill Livingstone, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunn A, Cory E, Atkinson J, Braddick O, Wattam-Bell J, Guzzetta A et al (2002) Dorsal and ventral stream sensitivity in normal development and hemiplegia. NeuroReport 13(6):843–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henderson SE, Sugden DA (1992) Movement assessment battery for children. The psychological corporation, SidcupGoogle Scholar
  13. Losse A, Henderson S, Elliman D, Hall D, Knight E, Jongmans M (1991) Clumsiness in children—do they grow out of it? A 10 year follow up study. Dev Med Child Neurol 33:55–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandich A, Buckolz E, Polatajko H (2003) Children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and their ability to disengage ongoing attentional focus: more on inhibitory function. Brain Cogn 51(3):346–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mon-Williams MA, Tresilian JR, Bell VE, Coppard VL, Nixdorf M, Carson RG (2005) The preparation of reach-to-grasp movements in adults, children, and children with movement problems. Q J Exp Psychol 58A(7):1249–1263Google Scholar
  16. O’Brien J, Spencer J, Atkinson J, Braddick O, Wattam-Bell J (2002) Form and motion coherence processing in dyspraxia: evidence of a global spatial processing deficit. Cogn Neurosci 13(11):1399–1402Google Scholar
  17. Olivier I, Audiffren M, Ripoll H (1998) Age-related differences in preparatory processes of motor programming. J Exp Child Psychol 69(1):49–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olivier I, Bard C (2000) The effects of spatial movement components pre-cues on the execution of rapid aiming in children aged 7, 9, and 11. J Exp Child Psychol 77(2):155–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rizzolatti G, Riggo L, Dascola I, Umilta C (1987) Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: evidence in favour of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25:31–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rolfs M, Vitu F (2007) On the limited role of target onset in the gap task: Support for the motor-preparation hypothesis. J Vis 7(10):1–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen 109:444–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scase MO, Braddick OJ, Raymond JE (1996) What is noise for the motion system? Vis Res 36:2579–2589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schellekens JHM, Huizing F, Kalverboer AF (1986) The influence of movement amplitude on precue-processing. Hum Mov Sci 5:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schellekens JHM, Kalverboer AF, Scholten CS (1984) The microstructure of tapping movements in children. J Mot Behav 16:20–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schulman JL, Buist C, Kaspar JC, Child D, Fackler E (1969) An objective test of speed of fine motor function. Percept Mot Skills 29:243–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheliga BM, Craighero L, Riggio G, Rizzolatti G (1997) Effects of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses. Exp Brain Res 114:339–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shulman GL, Ollinger JM, Akbudak E, Conturo TE, Snyder AZ, Peterson SE et al (1999) Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects. J Neurosci 19(21):9480–9496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sigmundsson H, Hansenc PC, Talcott JB (2003) Do “clumsy” children have visual deficits. Behav Brain Res 139(1–2):123–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stein J, Walsh V (1997) To see but not to read: the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends Neurosci 20:147–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sugden DA, Sugden LG (1992) The assessment of movement skill problems in 7- and 9-year-old children. Br J Dev Psychol 61:329–345Google Scholar
  31. Sugden DA, Wright HC (1998) Motor coordination disorders in children, vol 39. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Dellen T, Geuze RH (1988) Motor response processing in clumsy children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 29(4):489–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Dellen T, Geuze RH (1990) Development of auditory precue processing during a movement sequence. J Hum Mov Stud 18:229–241Google Scholar
  34. Visser J (2003) Developmental coordination disorder: a review of research on subtypes and comorbidities. Hum Mov Sci 22:479–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilmut K, Brown JH, Wann JP (2007) Attention disengagement in children with developmental coordination disorder. Disabil Rehabil 29(1):47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilmut K, Wann JP, Brown JH (2006) Problems in the coupling of eye and hand in the sequential movements of children with developmental coordination disorder. Child Care Health Dev 32(6):665–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson PH, Maruff P, McKenzie BE (1997) Covert orienting of visuospatial attention in children with developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol 39(11):736–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations