Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 189, Issue 3, pp 301–310 | Cite as

Finger force perception during ipsilateral and contralateral force matching tasks

Research Article

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to compare matching performance between ipsilateral and contralateral finger force matching tasks and to examine the effect of handedness on finger force perception. Eleven subjects were instructed to produce reference forces by an instructed finger (index—I or little—L finger) and to reproduce the same amount force by the same or a different finger within the hand (i.e., ipsilateral matching task), or by a finger of the other hand (i.e., contralateral matching task). The results of the ipsilateral and contralateral tasks in the present study commonly showed that (1) the reference and matching forces were matched closely when the two forces were produced by the same or homologous finger(s) such as I/I task; (2) the weaker little finger underestimated the magnitude of reference force of the index finger (I/L task), even with the higher level of effort (relative force), but the two forces were matched when considering total finger forces; (3) the stronger index finger closely matched the reference force of the little finger with the lower level of relative force (i.e., L/I task); (4) when considering the constant errors, I/L tasks showed an underestimation and L/I tasks showed an overestimation compared to I/I tasks. There was no handedness effect during ipsilateral tasks. During the contralateral task, the dominant hand overestimated the force of the non-dominant hand, while the non-dominant hand attempted to match the absolute force of the dominant hand. The overall results support the notion that the absolute, rather than relative, finger force is perceived and reproduced during ipsilateral and contralateral finger force matching tasks, indicating the uniqueness of finger force perception.

Keywords

Handedness Finger force perception Force matching task Ipsilateral matching task Contralateral matching task 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by an NIH grant (1R15NS053442-01A1).

References

  1. Blatow M, Nennig E, Durst A, Sartor K, Stippich C (2007) fMRI reflects functional connectivity of human somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 37:927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun C, Hess H, Burkhardt M, Wuhle A, Preissl H (2005) The right hand knows what the left hand is feeling. Exp Brain Res 162:366–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cafarelli E, Bigland-Ritchie B (1979) Sensation of static force in muscles of different length. Exp Neurol 65:511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson RG, Riek S, Shahbazpour N (2002) Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions. J Physiol 539:913–925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danion F, Latash ML, Li S (2003) Finger interactions studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation during multi-finger force production tasks. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1445–1455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danion F, Latash ML, Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM (2000) The effect of fatigue on multifinger co-ordination in force production tasks in humans. J Physiol 523 (Pt 2):523–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gandevia SC (1978) The sensation of heaviness after surgical disconnection of the cerebral hemispheres in man. Brain 101:295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gandevia SC (1987) Roles for perceived voluntary motor commands in motor control. Trends Neurosci 10:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977a) Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J Physiol 272:673–689PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI (1977b) Effects of related sensory inputs on motor performances in man studied through changes in perceived heaviness. J Physiol 272:653–672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Iwasaki N (1994) Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip. Neuropsychologia 32:555–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gorniak SL, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2007) Hierarchies of synergies: an example of two-hand, multi-finger tasks. Exp Brain Res 179:167–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henningsen H, Ende-Henningsen B, Gordon AM (1995) Asymmetric control of bilateral isometric finger forces. Exp Brain Res 105:304–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Illert M, Kummel H (1999) Reflex pathways from large muscle spindle afferents and recurrent axon collaterals to motoneurones of wrist and digit muscles: a comparison in cats, monkeys and humans. Exp Brain Res 128:13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johansson RS, Backlin JL, Burstedt MK (1999) Control of grasp stability during pronation and supination movements. Exp Brain Res 128:20–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johansson RS, Vallbo AB (1983) Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends Neurosci 6:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones LA (2003) Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces. Exp Brain Res 151:197–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones LA, Hunter IW (1982) Force sensation in isometric contractions: a relative force effect. Brain Res 244:186–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones LA, Hunter IW (1983) Effect of fatigue on force sensation. Exp Neurol 81:640–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones LA, Piateski E (2006) Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force. Exp Brain Res 168:298–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilbreath SL, Gandevia SC (1991) Independent digit control: failure to partition perceived heaviness of weights lifted by digits of the human hand. J Physiol (Lond) 442:585–599Google Scholar
  22. Kilbreath SL, Gandevia SC (1992) Independent control of the digits: changes in perceived heaviness over a wide range of force. Exp Brain Res 91:539–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kilbreath SL, Gandevia SC (1994) Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects. J Physiol 479:487–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kilbreath SL, Gorman RB, Raymond J, Gandevia SC (2002) Distribution of the forces produced by motor unit activity in the human flexor digitorum profundus. J Physiol 543:289–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kilbreath SL, Refshauge K, Gandevia SC (1997) Differential control of the digits of the human hand: evidence from digital anaesthesia and weight matching. Exp Brain Res 117:507–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kruger ES, Hoopes JA, Cordial RJ, Li S (2007) Error compensation during finger force production after one- and four-finger voluntarily fatiguing exercise. Exp Brain Res 181:461–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latash ML, Danion F, Scholz JF, Zatsiorsky VM, Schoner G (2003) Approaches to analysis of handwriting as a task of coordinating a redundant motor system. Hum Mov Sci 22:153–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Latash ML, Li S, Danion F, Zatsiorsky VM (2002) Central mechanisms of finger interaction during one- and two-hand force production at distal and proximal phalanges. Brain Res 924:198–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li S (2006) Perception of individual finger forces during multi-finger force production tasks. Neurosci Lett 409:239–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li S, Danion F, Latash ML, Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM (2000) Characteristics of finger force production during one and two-hand tasks. Hum Mov Sci 19:897–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li S, Danion F, Latash ML, Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM (2001) Bilateral deficit and symmetry in finger force production during two- hand multifinger tasks. Exp Brain Res 141:530–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li S, Danion F, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2002) Coupling phenomena during asynchronous submaximal two-hand, multi-finger force production tasks in humans. Neurosci Lett 331:75–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li S, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Finger interaction during multi-finger tasks involving finger addition and removal. Exp Brain Res 150:230–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Li S, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004) Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cogn Brain Res 20:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li S, Leonard CT (2006) The effect of enslaving on perception of finger forces. Exp Brain Res 172:301–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li ZM, Latash ML, Newell KM, Zatsiorsky VM (1998a) Motor redundancy during maximal voluntary contraction in four-finger tasks. Exp Brain Res 122:71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li ZM, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (1998b) Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Exp Brain Res 119:276–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2000) Contribution of the extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles to the moments in finger joints. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nihashi T, Naganawa S, Sato C, Kawai H, Nakamura T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Aoki I (2005) Contralateral and ipsilateral responses in primary somatosensory cortex following electrical median nerve stimulation—an fMRI study. Clin Neurophysiol 116:842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Park WH, Leonard CT, Li S (2007) Perception of finger forces within the hand after index finger fatiguing exercise. Exp Brain Res 182:169–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004a) Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, I: experimental observations. Biol Cybern 91:148–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Pataky TC, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2004b) Prehension synergies during nonvertical grasping, II: Modeling and optimization. Biol Cybern 91:231–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142:241–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schieber MH, Santello M (2004) Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol 96:2293–2300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shergill SS, Bays PM, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2003) Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation. Science 301:187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simoes C, Alary F, Forss N, Hari R (2002) Left-Hemisphere-Dominant SII Activation after Bilateral Median Nerve Stimulation. NeuroImage 15:686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wegner K, Forss N, Salenius S (2000) Characteristics of the human contra- versus ipsilateral SII cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 111:894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation ScienceThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations