Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 188, Issue 3, pp 457–463 | Cite as

Trunk antagonist co-activation is associated with impaired neuromuscular performance

  • N. Peter Reeves
  • Jacek Cholewicki
  • Theodore Milner
  • Angela S. Lee
Research Article

Abstract

The goal of this paper was to determine if trunk antagonist activation is associated with impaired neuromuscular performance. To test this theory, we used two methods to impair neuromuscular control: strenuous exertions and fatigue. Force variability (standard deviation of force signal) was assessed for graded isometric trunk exertions (10, 20, 40, 60, 80% of max) in flexion and extension, and at the start and end of a trunk extensor fatiguing trial. Normalized EMG signals for five trunk muscle pairs (RA rectus abdominis, EO external oblique, IO internal oblique, TE thoracic erector spinae, and LE lumbar erector spinae) were collected for each graded exertion, and at the start and end of a trunk extensor fatiguing trial. Force variability increased for more strenuous exertions in both flexion (P < 0.001) and extension (P < 0.001), and after extensor fatigue (P < 0.012). In the flexion direction, both antagonist muscles (TE and LE) increased activation for more strenuous exertions (P < 0.001). In the extension direction, all antagonist muscles except RA increased activation for more strenuous exertions (P < 0.05) and following fatigue (P < 0.01). These data demonstrate a strong relationship between force variability and antagonistic muscle activation, irrespective of where this variability comes from. Such antagonistic co-activation increases trunk stiffness with the possible objective of limiting kinematic disturbances due to greater force variability.

Keywords

Isometric trunk exertion Trunk muscle recruitment Force variability Fatigue Spine stability 

References

  1. Andersson GB, Ortengren R, Nachemson A (1977) Intradiskal pressure, intra-abdominal pressure and myoelectric back muscle activity related to posture and loading. Clin Orthop 129:156–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cholewicki J, Panjabi MM, Khachatryan A (1997) Stabilizing function of trunk flexor–extensor muscles around a neutral spine posture. Spine 22:2207–2212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clancy EA, Hogan N (1997) Relating agonist–antagonist electromyograms to joint torque during isometric, quasi-isotonic, nonfatiguing contractions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:1024–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Luca CJ, Mambrito B (1987) Voluntary control of motor units in human antagonist muscles: coactivation and reciprocal activation. J Neurophysiol 58:525–542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Serres SJ, Milner TE (1991) Wrist muscle activation patterns and stiffness associated with stable and unstable mechanical loads. Exp Brain Res 86:451–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ethier C, Brizzi L, Giguere D, Capaday C (2007) Corticospinal control of antagonistic muscles in the cat. Eur J Neurosci 26:1632–1641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franklin DW, So U, Kawato M, Milner TE (2004) Impedance control balances stability with metabolically costly muscle activation. J Neurophysiol 92:3097–3105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Granata KP, Slota GP, Wilson SE (2004) Influence of fatigue in neuromuscular control of spinal stability. Hum Factors 46:81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamilton AF, Jones KE, Wolpert DM (2004) The scaling of motor noise with muscle strength and motor unit number in humans. Exp Brain Res 157:417–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hebert LJ, De Serres SJ, Arsenault AB (1991) Cocontraction of the elbow muscles during combined tasks of pronation–flexion and supination–flexion. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 31:483–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herrmann CM, Madigan ML, Davidson BS, Granata KP (2006) Effect of lumbar extensor fatigue on paraspinal muscle reflexes. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 16:637–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lavender SA, Tsuang YH, Andersson GB, Hafezi A, Shin CC (1992a) Trunk muscle cocontraction: the effects of moment direction and moment magnitude. J Orthop Res 10:691–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lavender SA, Tsuang YH, Hafezi A, Andersson GB, Chaffin DB, Hughes RE (1992b) Coactivation of the trunk muscles during asymmetric loading of the torso. Hum Factors 34:239–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Marras WS, Mirka GA (1992) A comprehensive evaluation of trunk response to asymmetric trunk motion. Spine 17:318–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marras WS, Granata KP (1997) Spine loading during trunk lateral bending motions. J Biomech 30:697–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Brien PR, Potvin JR (1997) Fatigue-related EMG responses of trunk muscles to a prolonged, isometric twist exertion. Clin Biomech 12:306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osu R, Kamimura N, Iwasaki H, Nakano E, Harris CM, Wada Y, Kawato M (2004) Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependent noise. J Neurophysiol 92:1199–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parnianpour M, Nordin M, Kahanovitz N, Frankel V (1988) The triaxial coupling of torque generation of trunk muscles during isometric exertions and the effect of fatiguing isoinertial movements on the motor output and movement patterns. Spine 13:982–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peach JP, McGill SM (1998) Classification of low back pain with the use of spectral electromyogram parameters. Spine 23:1117–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Potvin JR, O’Brien PR (1998) Trunk muscle co-contraction increases during fatiguing, isometric, lateral bend exertions. Possible implications for spine stability. Spine 23:774–780. Discussion 781Google Scholar
  21. Roy SH, De Luca CJ, Casavant DA (1989) Lumbar muscle fatigue and chronic lower back pain. Spine 14:992–1001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roy SH, De Luca CJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Emley MS, Crenshaw RL, Lyons JP (1990) Fatigue, recovery, and low back pain in varsity rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:463–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schultz A, Cromwell R, Warwick D, Andersson G (1987) Lumbar trunk muscle use in standing isometric heavy exertions. J Orthop Res 5:320–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seroussi RE, Pope MH (1987) The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes. J Biomech 20:135–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherwood DE, Schmidt RA, Walter CB (1988) The force/force-variability relationship under controlled temporal conditions. J Mot Behav 20:106–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2000) Variability and noise in continuous force production. J Mot Behav 32:141–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sparto PJ, Parnianpour M, Marras WS, Granata KP, Reinsel TE, Simon S (1997) Neuromuscular trunk performance and spinal loading during a fatiguing isometric trunk extension with varying torque requirements. J Spinal Disord 10:145–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M (1995) Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. J Biomech 28:173–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thelen DG, Schultz AB, Ashton-Miller JA (1995) Co-contraction of lumbar muscles during the development of time-varying triaxial moments. J Orthop Res 13:390–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Dieen JH, Oude Vrielink HH, Toussaint HM (1993) An investigation into the relevance of the pattern of temporal activation with respect to erector spinae muscle endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 66:70–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang JF, Winter DA (1983) Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64:417–420PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Peter Reeves
    • 1
  • Jacek Cholewicki
    • 1
  • Theodore Milner
    • 2
  • Angela S. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Orthopedic Research, Osteopathic Surgical Specialties, College of Osteopathic MedicineMichigan State University, Ingham Regional Orthopedic HospitalLansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology and Physical EducationMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations