Effector- and target-independent representation of observed actions: evidence from incidental repetition priming
- 189 Downloads
Simulation mechanisms are thought to play an important role in action recognition. On this view, actions are represented through the re-enactment of the observed action. Mirror neurons are thought to be the neuronal counterpart of such a process, and code actions at a rather abstract level, often generalizing across sensory modalities and effectors. In humans, attention has been focussed on the somatotopic, effector dependent representation of observed actions in the mirror system. In this series of behavioural studies, we used incidental repetition priming to determine to which degree the cognitive representation of observed actions relies on effector- and target-dependent representations. Participants were presented with images depicting meaningless or meaningful actions and pressed a button only when presented with a meaningful action. Images were classified as depicting a repeated or new action, relative to the previous image in the trial series. In the first experiment, we demonstrate a priming effect based on the repetition of an action, performed by the same effector over the same target object. In the second experiment, we demonstrate that this facilitation holds even when the same action is performed over a different target object. Finally, in the third experiment we show that the action priming effect holds even when the same action is accomplished with different effectors. These results suggest the existence of a cognitive representation of actions, automatically activated during observation, which is abstract enough to generalize across different targets for that action and different effectors performing that action.
KeywordsEffector-independent Action observation Action representation Mirror neurons Repetition priming
We are grateful to Francesca Defeudis and Antonello Baldassarre for their help in collecting and analyzing data, and to Bernhard Hommel for his comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
- Calinon S, Guenter F, Billard A (2005) Goal-directed imitation in a humanoid robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
- Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (1998) Neurons responding to the sight of goal-directed hand/arm actions in the parietal area PF (7b) of the macaque monkey. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 275.5Google Scholar
- Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2007) The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions. In: Haggard P, Rossetti Y, Kawato M (eds) Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Attention and performance XXII. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Keele SW, Cohen A, Ivry R (1990) Motor programs: concepts and issues. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance, XIII: motor representation and control. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 77–107Google Scholar
- Lashley K (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Miller GA, Galanter E, Pribram K (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar