Advertisement

Effector- and target-independent representation of observed actions: evidence from incidental repetition priming

  • Marcello Costantini
  • Giorgia Committeri
  • Gaspare Galati
Research Article

Abstract

Simulation mechanisms are thought to play an important role in action recognition. On this view, actions are represented through the re-enactment of the observed action. Mirror neurons are thought to be the neuronal counterpart of such a process, and code actions at a rather abstract level, often generalizing across sensory modalities and effectors. In humans, attention has been focussed on the somatotopic, effector dependent representation of observed actions in the mirror system. In this series of behavioural studies, we used incidental repetition priming to determine to which degree the cognitive representation of observed actions relies on effector- and target-dependent representations. Participants were presented with images depicting meaningless or meaningful actions and pressed a button only when presented with a meaningful action. Images were classified as depicting a repeated or new action, relative to the previous image in the trial series. In the first experiment, we demonstrate a priming effect based on the repetition of an action, performed by the same effector over the same target object. In the second experiment, we demonstrate that this facilitation holds even when the same action is performed over a different target object. Finally, in the third experiment we show that the action priming effect holds even when the same action is accomplished with different effectors. These results suggest the existence of a cognitive representation of actions, automatically activated during observation, which is abstract enough to generalize across different targets for that action and different effectors performing that action.

Keywords

Effector-independent Action observation Action representation Mirror neurons Repetition priming 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Francesca Defeudis and Antonello Baldassarre for their help in collecting and analyzing data, and to Bernhard Hommel for his comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

221_2008_1369_MOESM1_ESM.tiff.
Meaningful actions used in experiments 1 and 3. (TIFF 1341 kb)
221_2008_1369_MOESM2_ESM.tiff.
Meaningless actions used in all the experiments. (TIFF 603 kb)
221_2008_1369_MOESM3_ESM.tiff.
Meaningful actions used in experiment 2. (TIFF 1347 kb)

References

  1. Aziz-Zadeh L, Wilson SM, Rizzolatti G, Iacoboni M (2006) Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Curr Biol 16:1818–1823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsalou LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 22:577–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Binkofski F, Amunts K, Stephan K, Posse S, Schormann T, Freund H, Zilles K, Seitz R (2000) Broca’s region subserves imagery of motion: a combined cytoarchitectonic and fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 11:273–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bekkering H, Wohlschlager A, Gattis M (2000) Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol A 53:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borghi AM (2004) Object concepts and action: extracting affordances from objects parts. Acta Psychol 115:69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol 106:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buccino G, Riggio L, Melli G, Binkofski F, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2005) Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cogn Brain Res 24:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckner R, Koutstaal W (1998) Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:891–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burstedt MKO, Benoni BE, Roland SJ (1997) Coordination of fingertip forces during human manipulation can emerge from independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit. Exp Brain Res 117:67–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calinon S, Guenter F, Billard A (2005) Goal-directed imitation in a humanoid robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  12. Catmur C, Walsh V, Heyes C (2007) Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system. Curr Biol 17:1527–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coles M, Gratton G, Bashore T, Eriksen C, Donchin E (1985) A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:529–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costantini M, Galati G, Ferretti A, Caulo M, Tartaro A, Romani GL, Aglioti SM (2005) Neural systems underlying observation of humanly impossible movements: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex 15:1761–1767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Craighero L, Bello A, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (2002) Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 40:492–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cross ES, AFdC Hamilton, Grafton ST (2006) Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers. Neuroimage 31:1257–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dehaene S, Naccache L, Clec’H GL, Koechlin E, Mueller M, Dehaene-Lambertz G, van de Moortele PF, Le Bihan D (1998) Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature 395:597–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Jong R, Liang C, Lauber E (1994) Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 20:731–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (1992) Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91:176–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Pellegrino G, Rafal R, Tipper SP (2005) Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: evidence from parietal extinction. Curr Biol 15:1469–1472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73:2608–2611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fogassi L, Gallese V, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (1998) Neurons responding to the sight of goal-directed hand/arm actions in the parietal area PF (7b) of the macaque monkey. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 275.5Google Scholar
  23. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G (2005) Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308:662–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galati G, Committeri G, Aprile T, Spitoni G, Di Russo F, Pitzalis S, Pizzamiglio L (2008) A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. Neuroimage 40:1274–1286. doi: doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.044 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallagher S (2007) Simulation trouble. Soc Neurosci 2:353–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallese V, Lakoff G (2005) The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cogn Neuropsychol 22:455–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gazzola V, Aziz-Zadeh L, Keysers C (2006) Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror system in humans. Curr Biol 16:1824–1829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gazzola V, van der Worp H, Mulder T, Wicker B, Rizzolatti G, Keysers C (2007) Aplasics born without hands mirror the goal of hand actions with their feet. Curr Biol 17:1235–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  31. Grafton ST, Fadiga L, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G (1997) Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6:231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grezes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40:212–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grezes J, Armony JL, Rowe J, Passingham RE (2003) Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 18:928–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2006) Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 26:1133–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamilton AF, Grafton ST (2007) The motor hierarchy: from kinematics to goals and intentions. In: Haggard P, Rossetti Y, Kawato M (eds) Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition. Attention and performance XXII. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Hanson C, Hirst W (1989) On the representation of events: a study of orientation, recall, and recognition. J Exp Psychol Gen 118:136–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hauk O, Johnsrude I, Pulvermüller F (2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41:301–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henson RNA, Rugg MD (2003) Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia 41:263–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hughes O, Abbs JH (1976) Labial–mandibular coordination in the production of speech: Implications for the operation of motor equivalence. Phonetica 44:199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G (1999) Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286:2526–2528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iacoboni M, Molnar-Szakacs I, Gallese V, Buccino G, Mazziotta J, Rizzolatti G (2005) Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biol 3:e79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kable JW, Chatterjee A (2006) Specificity of action representations in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1498–1517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kable JW, Lease-Spellmeyer J, Chatterjee A (2002) Neural substrates of action event knowledge. J Cogn Neurosci 14:795–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kable JW, Kan IP, Wilson A, Thompson-Schill SL, Chatterjee A (2005) Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1855–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keele SW, Cohen A, Ivry R (1990) Motor programs: concepts and issues. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance, XIII: motor representation and control. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 77–107Google Scholar
  46. Kohler E, Keysers C, Umiltà MA, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2002) Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297:846–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Koski L, Wohlschlager A, Bekkering H, Woods RP, Dubeau M-C, Mazziotta JC, Iacoboni M (2002) Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cereb Cortex 12:847–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N (2000) Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J Neurosci 20:3310–3318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lahav A, Saltzman E, Schlaug G (2007) Action representation of sound: audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. J Neurosci 27:308–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lashley K (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Majdandzic J, Grol MJ, van Schie HT, Verhagen L, Toni I, Bekkering H (2007) The role of immediate and final goals in action planning: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 37:589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller GA, Galanter E, Pribram K (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Murata A, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Raos V, Rizzolatti G (1997) Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 78:2226–2230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Newman-Norlund RD, van Schie HT, van Zuijlen AMJ, Bekkering H (2007) The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat Neurosci 10:817–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Newtson D (1973) Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 28:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phillips JC, Ward R (2002) S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: time course and specificity of response activation. Vis Cogn 9:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pizzamiglio L, Aprile T, Spitoni G, Pitzalis S, Bates E, D’Amico S, Di Russo F (2005) Separate neural systems for processing action- or non-action-related sounds. Neuroimage 24:852–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pobric G, de C Hamilton AF (2006) Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Curr Biol 16:524–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schacter DL, Buckner RL (1998) Priming and the brain. Neuron 20:185–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tettamanti M, Buccino G, Saccuman MC, Gallese V, Danna M, Scifo P, Fazio F, Rizzolatti G, Cappa SF, Perani D (2005) Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. J Cogn Neurosci 17:273–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830–846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tversky B, Hemenway K (1984) Objects, parts, and categories. J Exp Psychol Gen 113:169–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Umiltà MA, Kohler E, Gallese V, Fogassi L, Fadiga L, Keysers C, Rizzolatti G (2001) I know what you are doing: a neurophysiological study. Neuron 31:155–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Umiltà MA, Escola L, Intskirveli I, Grammont F, Rochat M, Caruana F, Jezzini A, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2008) When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2209–2213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705985105 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Urgesi C, Candidi M, Ionta S, Aglioti SM (2007) Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex. Nat Neurosci 10:30–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vallacher RR, Wegner DM (1987) What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychol Rev 94:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Costantini
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  • Giorgia Committeri
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gaspare Galati
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Clinical Sciences and Bio-imagingUniversity G. d’AnnunzioChieti, PescaraItaly
  2. 2.Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, Foundation University G. d’AnnunzioChietiItaly
  3. 3.Department of PsychologySapienza UniversityRomeItaly
  4. 4.Neuroimaging Laboratory, Foundation Santa LuciaRomeItaly
  5. 5.Department of Clinical Sciences and Bio-imagingUniversity of ChietiChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations