Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 188, Issue 2, pp 305–315

Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport–grasp coordination

  • Jarugool Tretriluxana
  • James Gordon
  • Carolee J. Winstein
Research Article


Few studies have directly compared the visuo-motor transformation of grasp pre-shaping or transport–grasp coordination of reach-to-grasp movements between the two hands. Our objective was to determine if there are manual asymmetries in right-handed adults as a foundation to investigate hemispheric specialization in individuals post-stroke. Twelve non-disabled right-handed adults performed rapid reach-to-grasp movements to cylinders of three sizes as vision of the arm and hand was partially occluded. We reasoned that the hand system (left or right) that is superior in anticipatory planning of aperture scaling and movement preparation would be more likely to exhibit early grasp pre-shaping under this experimental manipulation. Movement time, hand path, transport velocity, and aperture were derived from 3D electromagnetic sensor data. The visuo-motor transformation of object sizes into an action of aperture pre-shaping was quantified using the correlations between initial aperture velocity and object diameter, and peak aperture and object diameter. Coordination between hand transport and aperture grasping was quantified using the cross-correlation between transport velocity and aperture size. Peak aperture and object diameter were strongly correlated for both hands. However, early aperture velocity and object diameter were correlated only for left-hand movements. Cross-correlation analyses revealed a strong association between transport velocity and aperture only for right-hand movements. Together, these results suggest earlier anticipatory control for the left hand in the visuo-motor transformation of grasp pre-shaping and a stronger transport–grasp linkage for the right hand. Further, initial aperture velocity was a more sensitive measure of these manual asymmetries than peak aperture. Our findings compliment the specialization previously observed for pointing movements of the dominant and non-dominant hemispheric/limb system and the coordinated control of complex movements and visuo-spatial components, respectively.


Lateralization Kinematics Reach-to-grasp 


  1. Annett M, Annett J (1979) Individual differences in right and left reaction time. Br J Psychol 70:393–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL (2002) Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol 88:2408–2421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagesteiro LB, Sainburg RL (2003) Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. J Neurophysiol 90:1503–1513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulinguez P, Nougier V, Velay JL (2001a) Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. I. Study of right-handers. Cortex 37:101–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boulinguez P, Velay JL, Nougier V (2001b) Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. II. Study of left-handers. Cortex 37:123–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carson RG, Chua R, Elliott D, Goodman D (1990) The contribution of vision to asymmetries in manual aiming. Neuropsychologia 28:1215–1220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson RG, Chua R, Goodman D, Byblow WD, Elliott D (1995) The preparation of aiming movements. Brain Cogn 28:133–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen R, Gerloff C, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1997) Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities. Ann Neurol 41:247–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chua R, Carson RG, Goodman D, Elliott D (1992) Asymmetries in the spatial localization of transformed targets. Brain Cogn 20:227–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramer SC, Finklestein SP, Schaechter JD, Bush G, Rosen BR (1999) Activation of distinct motor cortex regions during ipsilateral and contralateral finger movements. J Neurophysiol 81:383–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Daskalakis ZJ, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Roshan L, Chen R (2002) The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 543:317–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davare M, Andres M, Cosnard G, Thonnard JL, Olivier E (2006) Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping. J Neurosci 26:2260–2268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desmurget M, Grea H, Prablanc C (1998) Final posture of the upper limb depends on the initial position of the hand during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 119:511–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Lazzaro V, Rothwell JC, Oliviero A, Profice P, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P (1999) Intracortical origin of the short latency facilitation produced by pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 129:494–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esparza DY, Archambault PS, Winstein CJ, Levin MF (2003) Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage. Exp Brain Res 148:488–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Eviatar Z, Hellige JB, Zaidel E (1997) Individual differences in lateralization: effects of gender and handedness. Neuropsychology 11:562–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farne A, Roy AC, Paulignan Y, Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D, Jeannerod M (2003) Visuo-motor control of the ipsilateral hand: evidence from right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia 41:739–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferbert A, Priori A, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Colebatch JG, Marsden CD (1992) Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 453:525–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisk JD, Goodale MA (1988) The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Exp Brain Res 72:425–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Umilta C, Rizzolatti G (1991) Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 29:361–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodale MA (1988) Hemispheric differences in motor control. Behav Brain Res 30:203–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bulthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI (1994) Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4:604–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grosskopf A, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP (2006) Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study. Exp Brain Res 168:230–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haaland KY, Prestopnik JL, Knight RT, Lee RR (2004) Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain 127:1145–1158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haggard P, Wing A (1998) Coordination of hand aperture with the spatial path of hand transport. Exp Brain Res 118:286–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanakawa T, Parikh S, Bruno MK, Hallett M (2005) Finger and face representations in the ipsilateral precentral motor areas in humans. J Neurophysiol 93:2950–2958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris-Love M, Cohen LG (2005) High level bilateral talks: focus on “effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition”.[comment]. J Neurophysiol 94:1664–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hellige JB (2001) Hemispheric asymmetry: what’s right and what’s left. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Hellige JB, Cumberland N (2001) Categorical and coordinate spatial processing: more on contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system. Brain Cogn 45:155–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hermsdorfer J, Laimgruber K, Kerkhoff G, Mai N, Goldenberg G (1999a) Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension. Exp Brain Res 128:41–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hermsdorfer J, Ulrich S, Marquardt C, Goldenberg G, Mai N (1999b) Prehension with the ipsilesional hand after unilateral brain damage. Cortex 35:139–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoff B, Arbib MA (1993) Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. J Mot Behav 25:175–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeannerod M (1981) Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects. In: LJaB A (ed) Attention and performance IX. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  34. Jeannerod M (1984) The timing of natural prehension movement. J Mot Behav 16:235–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H (1995) Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci 18:314–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim S-G, Ashe J, Hendrich K, Ellermann JM, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP (1993) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Science 261:615–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kobayashi M, Hutchinson S, Schlaug G, Pascual-Leone A (2003) Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions. Neuroimage 20:2259–2270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kosslyn SM, Koenig O, Barrett A, Cave CB, Tang J, Gabrieli JD (1989) Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15:723–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kudoh N, Hattori M, Numata N, Maruyama K (1997) An analysis of spatiotemporal variability during prehension movements: effects of object size and distance. Exp Brain Res 117:457–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marteniuk RG, Leavitt JL, MacKenzie CL, Athenes S (1990) Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Hum Mov Sci 9:149–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meulenbroek RG, Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J (2001) Planning reaching and grasping movements: simulating reduced movement capabilities in spastic hemiparesis. Motor Control 5:136–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Cohen LG (2004) Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 55(3):400–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paulignan Y, Frak VG, Toni I, Jeannerod M (1997) Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 114:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M (1996) In: Alan WM, Flanagan RJ, Haggard P (eds) Hand and brain: the neurophysiology and psychology of hand movements. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Rao SM, Binder JR, Bandettini PA, Hammeke TA, Yetkin FZ, Jesmanowicz A, Lisk LM, Morris GL, Mueller WM, Estkowski LD (1993) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements. Neurology 43:2311–2318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers BP, Carew JD, Meyerand ME (2004) Hemispheric asymmetry in supplementary motor area connectivity during unilateral finger movements. Neuroimage 22:855–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roth EC, Hellige JB (1998) Spatial processing and hemispheric asymmetry. Contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system. J Cogn Neurosci 10:472–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sainburg RL (2002) Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 142:241–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D (2000) Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol 83:2661–2675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sainburg RL, Wang J (2002) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145:437–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Urbano A, Babiloni C, Onorati P, Babiloni F (1996) Human cortical activity related to unilateral movements: a high resolution EEG study. Neuroreport 8:203–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson NV, Kimura D (1989) Right-hand superiority for throwing but not for intercepting. Neuropsychologia 27:1399–1414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C (1986) Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 18:245–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Winstein CJ, Garfinkel A (1989) Qualitative dynamics of disordered human locomotion: a preliminary investigation. J Mot Behav 21:373–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS (1995) Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res 105:163–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Winter DA (2004) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  58. Ziemann U, Ishii K, Borgheresi A, Yaseen Z, Battaglia F, Hallett M, Cincotta M, Wassermann EM (1999) Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor-evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles. J Physiol 518:895–906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jarugool Tretriluxana
    • 1
    • 2
  • James Gordon
    • 1
  • Carolee J. Winstein
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Biokinesiology and Physical TherapyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Faculty of Physical Therapy and Applied Movement ScienceMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations