Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 188, Issue 1, pp 77–89 | Cite as

Time-invariant reference frames for parietal reach activity

  • Christopher A. Buneo
  • Aaron P. Batista
  • Murray R. Jarvis
  • Richard A. Andersen
Research Article


Neurophysiological studies suggest that the transformation of visual signals into arm movement commands does not involve a sequential recruitment of the various reach-related regions of the cerebral cortex but a largely simultaneous activation of these areas, which form a distributed and recurrent visuomotor network. However, little is known about how the reference frames used to encode reach-related variables in a given “node” of this network vary with the time taken to generate a behavioral response. Here we show that in an instructed delay reaching task, the reference frames used to encode target location in the parietal reach region (PRR) and area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) do not evolve dynamically in time; rather the same spatial representation exists within each area from the time target-related information is first instantiated in the network until the moment of movement execution. As previously reported, target location was encoded predominantly in eye coordinates in PRR and in both eye and hand coordinates in area 5. Thus, the different computational stages of the visuomotor transformation for reaching appear to coexist simultaneously in the parietal cortex, which may facilitate the rapid adjustment of trajectories that are a hallmark of skilled reaching behavior.


Monkey Cortex Arm Coordinates Transformations 



The authors wish to thank Betty Gillikin, Kelsie Pejsa, Lea Martel and Viktor Shcherbatyuk for technical assistance, Janet Baer and Janna Wynne for veterinary care and Cierina Marks and Tessa Yao for administrative assistance. This work was supported by the J. G. Boswell Foundation, the Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, the National Eye Institute (NEI), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Office of Naval Research (ONR).


  1. Batista AP, Buneo CA, Snyder LH, Andersen RA (1999) Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science 285:257–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battaglia-Mayer A, Ferraina S, Mitsuda T, Marconi B, Genovesio A, Onorati P, Lacquaniti F, Caminiti R (2000) Early coding of reaching in the parietooccipital cortex. J Neurophysiol 83:2374–2391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Battaglia-Mayer A, Ferraina S, Genovesio A, Marconi B, Squatrito S, Molinari M, Lacquaniti F, Caminiti R (2001) Eye-hand coordination during reaching. II. An analysis of the relationships between visuomanual signals in parietal cortex and parieto-frontal association projections. Cereb Cortex 11:528–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buneo CA, Andersen RA (2006) The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44:2594–2606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buneo CA, Jarvis MR, Batista AP, Andersen RA (2002) Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 416:632–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buneo CA, Jarvis MR, Batista AP, Andersen RA (2003) Properties of spike train spectra in two parietal reach areas. Exp Brain Res 153:134–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnod Y, Baraduc P, Battaglia-Mayer A, Guigon E, Koechlin E, Ferraina S, Lacquaniti F, Caminiti R (1999) Parieto-frontal coding of reaching: an integrated framework. Exp Brain Res 129:325–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caminiti R, Ferraina S, Mayer AB (1998) Visuomotor transformations: early cortical mechanisms of reaching. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:753–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford JD, Medendorp WP, Marotta JJ (2004) Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 92:10–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deneve S, Latham PE, Pouget A (2001) Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes. Nat Neurosci 4:826–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Flanders M, Helms-Tillery SI, Soechting JF (1992) Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation. Behav Brain Sci 15:309–362Google Scholar
  13. Flanders M, Hondzinski JM, Soechting JF, Jackson JC (2003) Using arm configuration to learn the effects of gyroscopes and other devices. J Neurophysiol 89:450–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henriques DY, Klier EM, Smith MA, Lowy D, Crawford JD (1998) Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J Neurosci 18:1583–1594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalaska JF, Crammond DJ (1995) Deciding not to go—neuronal correlates of response selection in a go/nogo task in primate premotor and parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 5:410–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McIntyre J, Stratta F, Lacquaniti F (1998) Short-term memory for reaching to visual targets: psychophysical evidence for body-centered reference frames. The J Neurosci 18:8423–8435Google Scholar
  17. Messier J, Kalaska JF (2000) Covariation of primate dorsal premotor cell activity with direction and amplitude during a memorized-delay reaching task. J Neurophysiol 84:152–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Russo GS, Backus DA, Ye SP, Crutcher MD (2002) Neural activity in monkey dorsal and ventral cingulate motor areas: comparison with the supplementary motor area. J Neurophysiol 88:2612–2629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salinas E, Abbott LF (1995) Transfer of coded information from sensory to motor networks. J Neurosci 15:6461–6474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shen LM, Alexander GE (1997) Neural correlates of a spatial sensory-to-motor transformation in primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 77:1171–1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith MA, Crawford JD (2001) Self-organizing task modules and explicit coordinate systems in a neural network model for 3-D saccades. J Comput Neurosci 10:127–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snyder LH, Batista AP, Andersen RA (1997) Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature 386:167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Snyder LH, Batista AP, Andersen RA (2000) Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review. Vision Res 40:1433–1441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wise SP, Boussaoud D, Johnson PB, Caminiti R (1997) Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:25–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xing J, Andersen RA (2000) Models of the posterior parietal cortex which perform multimodal integration and represent space in several coordinate frames. J Cogn Neurosci 12:601–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. Zipser D, Andersen RA (1988) A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature 331:679–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher A. Buneo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aaron P. Batista
    • 1
    • 3
  • Murray R. Jarvis
    • 1
  • Richard A. Andersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of BiologyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.Harrington Department of BioengineeringArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations