Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 187, Issue 2, pp 237–253 | Cite as

Multi-muscle synergies in an unusual postural task: quick shear force production

  • Thomas Robert
  • Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky
  • Mark L. LatashEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

We considered a hypothetical two-level hierarchy participating in the control of vertical posture. The framework of the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) hypothesis was used to explore the muscle groupings (M-modes) and multi-M-mode synergies involved in the stabilization of a time profile of the shear force in the anterior–posterior direction. Standing subjects were asked to produce pulses of shear force into a target using visual feedback while trying to minimize the shift of the center of pressure (COP). Principal component analysis applied to integrated muscle activation indices identified three M-modes. The composition of the M-modes was similar across subjects and the two directions of the shear force pulse. It differed from the composition of M-modes described in earlier studies of more natural actions associated with large COP shifts. Further, the trial-to-trial M-mode variance was partitioned into two components: one component that does not affect a particular performance variable (V UCM), and its orthogonal component (V ORT). We argued that there is a multi-M-mode synergy stabilizing this particular performance variable if V UCM is higher than V ORT. Overall, we found a multi-M-mode synergy stabilizing both shear force and COP coordinate. For the shear force, this synergy was strong for the backward force pulses and nonsignificant for the forward pulses. An opposite result was found for the COP coordinate: the synergy was stronger for the forward force pulses. The study shows that M-mode composition can change in a task-specific way and that two different performance variables can be stabilized using the same set of elemental variables (M-modes). The different dependences of the ΔV indices for the shear force and COP coordinate on the force pulse direction supports applicability of the principle of superposition (separate controllers for different performance variables) to the control of different mechanical variables in postural tasks. The M-mode composition allows a natural mechanical interpretation.

Keywords

Synergy Posture Muscle mode Uncontrolled manifold hypothesis Electromyogram Reference configuration hypothesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was partly supported by NIH grants AG-018751, NS-035032, and AR-048563. We are grateful to Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos for his help.

References

  1. Alexandrov AV, Frolov AA, Massion J (2001) Biomechanical analysis of movement strategies in human forward trunk bending. I. Modeling. Biol Cybern 84:425–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arimoto S, Tahara K, Yamaguchi M, Nguyen PTA, Han HY (2001) Principles of superposition for controlling pinch motions by means of robot fingers with soft tips. Robotica 19:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asaka T, Wang Y, Fukushima J, Latash ML (2008) Learning effects on muscle modes and multi-mode postural synergies. Exp Brain Res 184:323–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL, Latash ML, Almeida GL, Agarwal GC (1992) Electromechanical delay: an experimental artifact. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danna-dos-Santos A, Slomka K, Latash ML, Zatsiorky VM (2007) Muscle modes and synergies during voluntary body sway. Exp Brain Res 179:533–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. d’Avella A, Bizzi E (2005) Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3076–3081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldman AG (1966) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. II. Controllable parameters of the muscle. Biophysics 11:565–578Google Scholar
  9. Feldman AG (1986) Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (λ-model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18:17–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) Positional frames of reference in motor control: their origin and use. Behav Brain Sci 18:723–806Google Scholar
  11. Feldman AG, Goussev V, Sangole A, Levin MF (2007) Threshold position control and the principle of minimal interaction in motor actions. Prog Brain Res 165:267–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelfand IM, Tsetlin ML (1966) On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Gelfand IM, Gurfinkel VS, Fomin SV, Tsetlin ML (eds) Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems. Nauka, Moscow, pp 9–26 (in Russian, a translation is available in 1971 edition by MIT Press, Cambridge)Google Scholar
  13. Henry SM, Fung J, Horak FB (1998), EMG responses to maintain stance during multidirectional surface translations. J Neurophysiol 80:1939–1950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55:1369–1381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2004) Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol 556:267–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2005) Coordination of locomotion with voluntary movements in humans. J Neurosci 25:7238–7253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ivanenko YP, Wright WG, Gurfinkel VS, Horak F, Cordo P (2006) Interaction of involuntary post-contraction activity with locomotor movements. Exp Brain Res 169:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krishnamoorthy V, Goodman SR, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003a) Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: identification of muscle modes. Biol Cybern 89:152–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003b) Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Exp Brain Res 152:281–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2004) Muscle modes during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: effects of instability and additional support. Exp Brain Res 157:18–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latash ML, Anson JG (1996) What are normal movements in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci 19:55–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latash ML, Anson JG (2006) Synergies in health and disease: relations to adaptive changes in motor coordination. Phys Ther 86:1151–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2006) Principle of superposition in human prehension. In: Kawamura S, Swinin M (eds) Advances in robot control: from everyday physics to human-like movements, Springer, New York, pp 249–261Google Scholar
  24. Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2001) Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multi-finger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 141:153–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2002a) Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 146:412–432Google Scholar
  26. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002b) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30:26–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control 11:275–307Google Scholar
  28. Pilon J-F, De Serres SJ, Feldman AG (2007) Threshold position control of arm movement with anticipatory increase in grip force. Exp Brain Res 181:49–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Runge CF, Shupert CL, Horak FB, Zajac FE (1999) Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait Posture 10:161–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saltiel P, Wyler-Duda K, d’Avella A, Tresch MC, Bizzi E (2001) Muscle synergies encoded within the spinal cord: evidence from focal intraspinal NMDA iontophoresis in the frog. J Neurophysiol 5:605–619Google Scholar
  31. Schieber MH (2001) Constraints on somatotopic organization in the primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 86:2125–2143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schieber MH, Rivlis G (2007) Partial reconstruction of muscle activity from a pruned network of diverse motor cortex neurons. J Neurophysiol 97:70–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scholz JP, Schöner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold analysis concept identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:189–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schoner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86:29–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shim JK, Lay B, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2004) Age-related changes in finger coordination in static prehension tasks. J Appl Physiol 97:213–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2004) Ratio of shear to load ground-reaction force may underlie the directional tuning of the automatic postural response to rotation and translation. J Neurophysiol 92:808–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 93:609–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Torres-Oviedo G, Macpherson JM, Ting L (2006) Muscle synergy organization is robust across a variety of postural perturbations. J Neurophysiol 96:1530–1546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Torres-Oviedo G, Ting L (2007) Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses. J Neurophysiol 98:2144–2156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang Y, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2005) Muscle synergies involved in shifting center of pressure during making a first step. Exp Brain Res 167:196–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang Y, Asaka T, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2006) Muscle synergies during voluntary body sway: combining across-trials and within-a-trial analyses. Exp Brain Res 174:679–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winter DA, Prince F, Frank JS, Powell C, Zabjek KF (1996) Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. J Neurophysiol 75:2334–2343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML, Gao F, Shim JK (2004) The principle of superposition in human prehension. Robotica 22:231–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang W, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) What do synergies do? Effects of secondary constraints on multi-digit synergies in accurate force-production tasks. J Neurophysiol. PMID: 18046000Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Robert
    • 1
  • Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky
    • 1
  • Mark L. Latash
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations