Vertical perturbations of human gait: organisation and adaptation of leg muscle responses
- 281 Downloads
During the last several years, evidence has arisen that the neuronal control of human locomotion depends on feedback from load receptors. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects and the course of sudden and unexpected changes in body load (vertical perturbations) on leg muscle activity patterns during walking on a treadmill. Twenty-two healthy subjects walking with 25% body weight support (BWS) were repetitively and randomly loaded to 5% or unloaded to 45% BWS during left mid-stance. At the new level of BWS, the subjects performed 3–11 steps before returning to 25% BWS (base level). EMG activity of upper and lower leg muscles was recorded from both sides. The bilateral leg muscle activity pattern changed following perturbations in the lower leg muscles and the net effect of the vertical perturbations showed onset latencies with a range of 90–105 ms. Body loading enhanced while unloading diminished the magnitude of ipsilateral extensor EMG amplitude, compared to walking at base level. Contralateral leg flexor burst activity was shortened following loading and prolonged following unloading perturbation while flexor EMG amplitude was unchanged. A general decrease in EMG amplitudes occurred during the course of the experiment. This is assumed to be due to adaptation. Only the muscles directly activated by the perturbations did not significantly change EMG amplitude. This is assumed to be due to the required compensation of the perturbations by polysynaptic spinal reflexes released following the perturbations. The findings underline the importance of load receptor input for the control of locomotion.
KeywordsLocomotion Body weight support (BWS) Loading perturbation (LP) Unloading perturbation (UP) Loading response
We want to thank all the volunteers who participated in this study, Mathias Wellner for assistance with programming and Rachel Jurd for her help with editing the English. The study was supported by the International Institute for Research in Paraplegia (IFP) and by the Betty and David Koetser Foundation for Brain Research.
- Berger W, Dietz V, Quintern J (1987) Interlimb coordination of posture in man (Abstract). J Physiol 390:135Google Scholar
- Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Duysens J, Tax AAM (1994) Interlimb reflexes during gait in cats and human. In: Swinnen SP, Heuer H, Massion J, Casaer P (eds) Interlimb coordination: neural, dynamical, and cognitive constraints. Academic, San Diego, pp 97–126Google Scholar
- Prochazka A, Gillard D, Bernett D (1997) Indications of positive feedback in the control of movement. J Neurophysiol 77:37–51Google Scholar
- Vaughan CL, Davis BL, O’Connor JC (1992) Dynamics of human gait. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar