Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 185, Issue 4, pp 553–562 | Cite as

Vestibulo-ocular responses to vertical translation in normal human subjects

  • Ke Liao
  • Mark F. Walker
  • Anand Joshi
  • Millard Reschke
  • R. John Leigh
Research Article


Prior studies of the human translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (tVOR) report that eye rotations amount to less than 60% of those required to keep the eyes pointed at a stationary visual target, unlike the angular VOR (aVOR) which is optimized to maintain stable gaze. Our first goal was to determine if the performance of the tVOR improves when head translations are combined with head rotations in ambient lighting. A second goal was to measure tVOR during vertical head translations (bob), which has not received systematic study. We measured tVOR alone and in combination with the aVOR in 20 normal human subjects, aged 25–72 years, as they sat on a moving platform that bobbed at 2.0 Hz while rotating horizontally (yaw) at 1.0 Hz. When subjects viewed a visual target at 2 m, median “compensation gain” (eye rotational velocity/required eye rotational velocity to maintain foveal target fixation) was 0.52 during pure bob and 0.59 during combined bob–yaw; during viewing of a near target at ∼17 cm, compensation gain was 0.58 for pure bob and 0.60 for combined bob–yaw. Mean phase lag of eye-in-head velocity for the tVOR was ∼19° with respect to the ideal compensatory response, irrespective of whether translation was accompanied by rotation. Thus, the tVOR changed only slightly during translation–rotation versus pure translation, and our subjects’ ocular rotations remained at about 60% of those required to point the eyes at the target. Comparison of response during binocular or monocular viewing, and ambient or reduced illumination, indicated that relative image motion between the target and background was an important determinant of tVOR behavior. We postulate that tVOR evolved not to stabilize the image of the target on the fovea, but rather to minimize retinal image motion between objects lying in different planes, in order to optimize motion parallax information.


Vestibulo-ocular reflex Locomotion Moving platform 



This research was supported by NASA/NSBRI NA00208, Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, NIH grant EY06717, and the Evenor Armington Fund.We are grateful to the subjects who volunteered to serve in this study and to Drs. Harold Bedell, John Stahl, David Zee, Gary Paige, Matthew Thurtell, Louis Dell’Osso, Robert Kirsch, and Miklos Gratzl for their helpful advice. The work reported in this paper constitutes research performed by Ke Liao as part of the requirements for his Doctoral Dissertation.

Supplementary material

221_2007_1181_MOESM1_ESM.doc (42 kb)
Appendix A (DOC 42.0 kb)


  1. Anastasopoulos D, Gianna CC, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA (1996) Interaction of linear and angular vestibulo-ocular reflexes of human subjects in response to transient motion. Exp Brain Res 110:465–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelaki DE (2004) Eyes on target: what neurons must do for the vestibuloocular reflex during linear motion. J Neurophysiol 92:20–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloomberg JJ, Reschke MF, Huebner WP, Peters BT (1992) The effects of target distance on eye and head movement during locomotion. Ann NY Acad Sci 656:699–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronstein AM, Gresty MA (1991) Compensatory eye movements in the presence of conflicting canal and otolith signals. Exp Brain Res 85:697–700PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carpenter RHS (1991) The visual origins of ocular motility. In: Cronly-Dillon JR (ed) Vision and visual function. Vol 8. Eye movements. MacMillan Press, London, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  6. Challis JH (1995) A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. J Biomech 28:733–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crane BT, Demer JL (1997) Human gaze stabilization during natural activities: translation, rotation, magnification, and target distance effects. J Neurophysiol 78:2129–2144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Das VE, DiScenna AO, Feltz A, Yaniglos SS, Leigh RJ (1998) Tests of a linear model of visual–vestibular interaction using the technique of parameter estimation. Biol Cybern 78:183–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das VE, Dell’Osso LF, Leigh RJ (1999) Enhancement of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by prior eye movements. J Neurophysiol 81:2884–2892PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Demer JL, Amjadi F (1993) Dynamic visual acuity of normal subjects during vertical optotype and head motion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:1894–1906PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez C, Goldberg JM (1976) Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force–response relations. J Neurophysiol 39:985–995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gianna CC, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM (1997) Eye movements induced by lateral acceleration steps. Exp Brain Res 114:124–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossman GE, Leigh RJ, Abel LA, Lanska DJ, Thurston SE (1988) Frequency and velocity of rotational head perturbations during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 70:470–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman GE, Leigh RJ, Bruce EN, Huebner WP, Lanska DJ (1989) Performance of the human vestibuloocular reflex during locomotion. J Neurophysiol 62:264–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Han Y, Somers JT, Kim JI, Kumar AN, Leigh RJ (2001) Ocular responses to head rotations during mirror viewing. J Neurophysiol 86:2323–2329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Haslwanter T (1995) Mathematics of three-dimensional eye rotations. Vis Res 35:1727–1739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haustein W (1989) Considerations on Listing’s Law and the primary position by means of a matrix description of eye position control. Biol Cybern 60:411–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hepp K (1990) On Listing’s law. Commun Math Phys 132:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hirasaki E, Moore ST, Raphan T, Cohen B (1999) Effects of walking velocity on vertical head and body movements during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 127:117–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huebner WP, Leigh RJ, Seidman SH, Thomas CW, Billian C, DiScenna AO, Dell’Osso LF (1992) Experimental tests of a superposition hypothesis to explain the relationship between the vestibuloocular reflex and smooth pursuit during horizontal combined eye-head tracking in humans. J Neurophysiol 68:1775–1792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Israël I, Berthoz A (1989) Contribution of the otoliths to the calculation of linear displacement. J Neurophysiol 62:247–263PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao K, Wagner J, Joshi A, Estrovich I, Walker MF, Strupp M, Leigh RJ (2007a) Why do patients with PSP fall? Evidence for abnormal otolith response. Neurology (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Liao K, Walker MF, Joshi A, Reschke MF, Leigh RJ (2007b) Human vestibulo-ocular responses to rotating while translating. Soc Neurosci (Abstr 109881)Google Scholar
  24. Maruta J, Simpson JI, Raphan T, Cohen B (2005) Orienting eye movements and nystagmus produced by translation while rotating (TWR). Exp Brain Res 163:273–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Massaad F, Lejeune TM, Detrembleur C (2007) The up and down bobbing of human walking: a compromise between muscle work and efficiency. J Physiol 582:789–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Miles FA (1998) The neural procesing of 3-D visual information: evidence from eye movements. Eur J Neurosci 10:811–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore ST, Hirasaki E, Cohen B, Raphan T (1999) Effect of viewing distance on the generation of vertical eye movements during locomotion. Exp Brain Res 129:347–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paige GD (1989) The influence of target distance on eye movement responses during vertical linear motion. Exp Brain Res 77:585–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paige GD, Telford L, Seidman SH, Barnes GR (1998) Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement. J Neurophysiol 80:2391–2404PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pozzo T, Berthoz A, Lefort L (1990) Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans. I. Normal subjects. Exp Brain Res 82:97–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramat S, Zee DS (2003) Ocular motor responses to abrupt interaural head translation in normal humans. J Neurophysiol 90:887–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramat S, Schmid R, Zambarbieri D (2003) Eye-head coordination in darkness: formulation and testing of a mathematical model. J Vestib Res 13:79–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramat S, Straumann D, Zee DS (2005) The interaural translational VOR: suppression, enhancement and cognitive control. J Neurophysiol 94:2391–2402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwarz U, Miles FA (1991) Ocular responses to translation and their dependence on viewing distance. I. Motion of the observer. J Neurophysiol 66:851–864PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Steffen H, Walker MF, Zee DS (2000) Rotation of Listing’s plane with convergence: independence from eye position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:715–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Straumann D, Steffen H, Landau K, Bergamin O, Mudgil AV, Walker MF, Guyton DL, Zee DS (2003) Primary position and Listing’s law in acquired and congenital trochlear nerve palsy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:4282–4292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Telford L, Seidman SH, Paige GD (1998) Canal–otolith interactions in the squirrel monkey vestibulo-ocular reflex and the influence of fixation distance. Exp Brain Res 118:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viirre E, Tweed D, Milner K, Vilis T (1986) A reexamination of the gain of the vestibuloocular reflex. J Neurophysiol 56:439–450PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ke Liao
    • 2
  • Mark F. Walker
    • 1
  • Anand Joshi
    • 2
  • Millard Reschke
    • 3
  • R. John Leigh
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyVeterans Affairs Medical Center and University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringVeterans Affairs Medical Center and University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Neurosciences LaboratoriesJohnson Space CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations