Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 184, Issue 4, pp 521–528 | Cite as

Motor intracortical inhibition in PD: L-DOPA modulation of high-frequency rTMS effects

  • Brigida Fierro
  • Filippo Brighina
  • Marco D’Amelio
  • Ornella Daniele
  • Innocenzo Lupo
  • Paolo Ragonese
  • Antonio Palermo
  • Giovanni Savettieri
Research Article


Dopaminergic drugs and deep brain stimulation restore cortical inhibition in Parkinson disease (PD) patients. High-frequency rTMS was also found to increase cortical inhibition in PD but its therapeutic effect is still controversial. Here we hypothesize that, if dopaminergic drugs reverse to normal cortical excitability in M1, the effect of high-frequency (hf)-rTMS in PD patients could depend on whether they are in a medicated or unmedicated state. The present study aims to explore the lasting effects of sub-threshold hf rTMS trains over M1 on cortical inhibition in patients with “on” and without “off” L-DOPA treatment. Fourteen PD patients were examined twice while “on” and “off” medication. In both conditions, a paired-pulse paradigm was used to evaluate short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and long intracortical inhibition (LICI) that were evaluated before and after hf rTMS trains applied on the motor cortex. The results were compared with those obtained from normal controls. In baseline condition, SICI and LICI were significantly reduced in “off” compared to “on” patients and controls. hf-rTMS over the motor cortex significantly increased SICI and LICI in “off” medication PD patients. Magnetic stimulation proved to be ineffective when the same patients were in “on” state. The results showed that hf-rTMS affected intracortical inhibition (ICI) only in unmedicated patients. By restoring cortical inhibitory circuits dopaminergic drugs, normalize the excitability changes in M1 subsequent to motor rTMS. Whether patients are in a medicated or an unmedicated state would therefore appear to be critical for rTMS effects in PD patients. If a positive correlation exists between increased cortical inhibition and clinical improvement, hf-rTMS during the “off” state could be regarded as a potential add-on treatment to reduce the need of L-dopa and thus delay the adverse effects of its chronic use.


  1. Aydin-Abidin S, Moliadze V, Eysel UT, Funke K (2006) Effects of repetitive TMS on visually evoked potentials and EEG in the anaesthetized cat: dependence on stimulus frequency and train duration. J Physiol 574:443–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bares M, Kanovsky P, Klajblova H, Rektor I (2003) Intracortical inhibition and facilitation are impaired in patients with early Parkinson’s disease: a paired TMS study. Eur J Neurol 10:385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berardelli A, Rona S, Inghilleri M, Manfredi M (1996) Cortical inhibition in Parkinson’s disease. A study with paired magnetic stimulation. Brain 119:71–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Gilio F, et al (1999) Effects of repetitive cortical stimulation on the silent period evoked by magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 125:82–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buhmann C, Gorsler A, Baumer T, et al (2004) Abnormal excitability of premotor-motor connections in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Brain 127:2732–2746PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantello R, Gianelli M, Bettucci D, Civardi C, De Angelis MS, Mutani R (1991) Parkinson’s disease rigidity: magnetic motor evoked potentials in a small hand muscle. Neurology 41:1449–1456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantello R, Tarletti R, Civardi C (2002) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 38:309–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cepeda C, Radisalvljevic Z, Peacock W, Levine MS (1992) Differential modulation by dopamine of responses evoked by excitatory amino acids in human cortex. Synapse 11:330–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen R, Garg RR, Lozano AM, Lang AE (2001) Effects of internal globus pallidus stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Neurology 56:716–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunic D, Roshan L, Khan FI, Lozano AM, Lang AE, Chen R (2002) Effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on motor cortex excitability in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 58:1665–1672PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Daskalakis ZJ, Moller B, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Gunraj C, Chen R (2006) The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical inhibition in healthy human subjects. Exp Brain Res 174:403–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dauper J, Peschel T, Schrader C, et al (2002) Effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Neurology 59:700–706PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. de Groot M, Hermann W, Steffen J, Wagner A, Grahmann F (2001) Contralateral and ipsilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson patients. Nervenarzt 72:932–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fierro B, Brighina F, Vitello G, et al (2005) Modulatory effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual cortex of healthy subjects undergoing light deprivation. J Physiol 1, 565:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ (2006) A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 117:2584–2596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fregni F, Simon DK, Wu A, Pascual-Leone A (2005) Non-invasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1614–1623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gangitano M, Valero-Cabre A, Tormos JM, Mottaghy FM, Romero JR, Pascual-Leone A (2002) Modulation of input-output curves by low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1249–1257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghabra MB, Hallett M, Wassermann EM (1999) Simultaneous repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not speed fine movement in PD. Neurology 52:768–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibb WR, Lees AJ (1988) The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:745–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gil Z, Amitai Y (1996) Properties of convergent thalamocortical and intracortical synaptic potentials in single neurons of neocortex. J Neurosci 16:6567–6578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilio F, Curra A, Inghilleri M, Lorenzano C, Manfredi M, Berardelli A (2002) Repetitive magnetic stimulation of cortical motor areas in Parkinson’s disease: implications for the pathophysiology of cortical function. Mov Disord 17:467–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ili’c TV, Meintzschel F, CleV U, Ruge D, Kessler KR, Ziemann U (2002) Short-interval paired-pulse inhibition and facilitation of human motor cortex: the dimension of stimulus intensity. J Physiol 545:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karreman M, Moghaddam B (1996) The prefrontal cortex regulates the basal release of dopamine in the limbic striatum: an effect mediated by ventral tegmental area. J Neurochem 66:589–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keck ME, Welt T, Muller MB, et al (2002) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the release of dopamine in the mesolimbic and mesostriatal system. Neuropharmacology 43:101–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khedr EM, Farweez HM, Islam H (2003) Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. Eur J Neurol 10:567–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khedr EM, Rothwell JC, Ahmed MA, Shawky OA, Farouk M (2007) Modulation of motor cortical excitability following rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cin Neurophysiol 118:140–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, et al (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:501–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lefaucheur JP, Drouot X, Von Raison F, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Cesaro P, Nguyen JP (2004) Improvement of motor performance and modulation of cortical excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2530–2541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maeda F, Gangitano M, Thall M, Pascual-Leone A (2002) Inter- and intra-individual variability of paired-pulse curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Clin Neurophysiol 113:376–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maeda F, Keenan JP, Tormos JM, Topka H, Pascual-Leone A (2000) Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability. Exp Brain Res 133:425–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchese R, Trompetto C, Buccolieri A, Abbruzzese G (2000) Abnormalities of motor cortical excitability are not correlated with clinical features in atypical parkinsonism. Mov Disord 15:1210–1214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mir P, Matsunaga K, Gilio F, Quinn NP, Siebner HR, Rothwell JC (2005) Dopaminergic drugs restore facilitatory premotor-motor interactions in Parkinson disease. Neurology 64:1906–1912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakamura H, Kitagawa H, Kawaguchi Y, Tsuji H, Takano H, Nakatoh S (1995) Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after paired magnetic stimulation in humans under anesthesia. Neurosci Lett 199:155–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nakamura H, Kitagawa H, Kawaguchi Y, Tsuji H (1997) Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans. J Physiol 498:817–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Okabe S, Ugawa Y, Kanazawa I (2003) Effectiveness of rTMS on Parkinson’s disease study group. 0.2-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has no add-on effects as compared to a realistic sham stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 18:382–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Sole J, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Grafman J, Hallett M (1994) Akinesia in Parkinson’s disease. II. Effects of subthreshold repetitive transcranial motor cortex stimulation. Neurology 44:892–898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Peinemann A, Lehner C, Mentschel C, Munchau A, Conrad B, Siebner HR (2000) Subthreshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human primary motor cortex reduces intracortical paired-pulse inhibition. Neurosci Lett 296:21–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peinemann A, Reimer B, Loer C, Quartarone A, Munchau A, Conrad B, Siebner HR (2004) Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1,800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1519–1526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pierantozzi M, Palmieri MG, Marciani MG, Bernardi G, Giacomini P, Stanzione P (2001) Effect of apomorphine on cortical inhibition in Parkinson’s disease patients: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Exp Brain Res 141:52–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pierantozzi M, Palmieri MG, Mazzone P, et al (2002) Deep brain stimulation of both subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus restores intracortical inhibition in Parkinson’s disease paralleling apomorphine effects: a paired magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 113:108–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Priori A, Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Accornero N, Manfredi M (1994) Motor cortical inhibition and the dopaminergic system. Pharmacological changes in the silent period after transcranial brain stimulation in normal subjects, patients with Parkinson’s disease and drug-induced parkinsonism. Brain 117:317–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ridding MC, Inzelberg R, Rothwell JC (1995) Changes in excitability of motor cortical circuitry in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 37:181–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romeo S, Gilio F, Pedace F, et al (2000) Changes in the cortical silent period after repetitive magnetic stimulation of cortical motor areas. Exp Brain Res 135:504–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salako SE (2006) The declaration of Helsinki 2000: ethical principles and the dignity of difference. Med Law 25:341–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sanger TD, Garg RR, Chen R (2001) Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 530:307–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimamoto H, Takasaki K, Shigemori M, Imaizumi T, Ayabe M, Shoji H (2001) Therapeutic effect and mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 248(Suppl 3):III48–III52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Siebner HR, Mentschel C, Auer C, Lehner C, Conrad B (2000a) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation causes a short-term increase in the duration of the cortical silent period in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett 284:147–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siebner HR, Rossmeier C, Mentschel C, Peinemann A, Conrad B (2000b) Short-term motor improvement after sub-threshold 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor hand area in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 178:91–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stefan K, Kunesch E, Benecke R, Cohen LG, Classen J (2002) Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation. J Physiol 543:699–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strafella AP, Paus T, Barrett J, Dagher A (2001) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus. J Neurosci 21(15):RC 157Google Scholar
  51. Strafella AP, Paus T, Fraraccio M, Dagher A (2003) Striatal dopamine release induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain 126:2609–2615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Strafella AP, Valzania F, Nassetti SA, et al (2000) Effects of chronic levodopa and pergolide treatment on cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1198–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tergau F, Wassermann EM, Paulus W, Ziemann U (1999) Lack of clinical improvement in patients with Parkinson’s disease after low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 51:281–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Tsuji S, Akamatsu N (2003) Does transcranial magnetic stimulation improve the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease? J Neurol 250(Suppl 3):III47–III50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Valls-Sole J, Pascual-Leone A, Wassermann EM, Hallett M (1992) Human motor evoked responses to paired transcranial magnetic stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85:355–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Valzania F, Strafella AP, Quatrale R, et al (1997) Motor evoked responses to paired cortical magnetic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:37–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wassermann EM (1998) Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the international workshop on the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, June 5–7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Werhahn KJ, Kunesch E, Noachtar S, Benecke R, Classen J (1999) Differential effects on motor cortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans. J Physiol 517:591–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu T, Sommer M, Tergau F, Paulus W (2000) Lasting influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on intracortical excitability in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 287:37–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ziemann U, Tergau F, Bruns D, Baudewig J, Paulus W (1997) Changes in human motor cortex excitability induced by dopaminergic and anti-dopaminergic drugs. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:430–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigida Fierro
    • 1
  • Filippo Brighina
    • 1
  • Marco D’Amelio
    • 1
  • Ornella Daniele
    • 1
  • Innocenzo Lupo
    • 1
  • Paolo Ragonese
    • 1
  • Antonio Palermo
    • 1
  • Giovanni Savettieri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations