Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations
- 655 Downloads
The vestibular system analyses angular and linear accelerations of the head that are important information for perceiving the location of one’s own body in space. Vestibular stimulation and in particular galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) that allow a systematic modification of vestibular signals has so far mainly been used to investigate vestibular influence on sensori-motor integration in eye movements and postural control. Comparatively, only a few behavioural and imaging studies have investigated how cognition of space and body may depend on vestibular processing. This study was designed to differentiate the influence of left versus right anodal GVS compared to sham stimulation on object-based versus egocentric mental transformations. While GVS was applied, subjects made left-right judgments about pictures of a plant or a human body presented at different orientations in the roll plane. All subjects reported illusory sensations of body self-motion and/or visual field motion during GVS. Response times in the mental transformation task were increased during right but not left anodal GVS for the more difficult stimuli and the larger angles of rotation. Post-hoc analyses suggested that the interfering effect of right anodal GVS was only present in subjects who reported having imagined turning themselves to solve the mental transformation task (egocentric transformation) as compared to those subjects having imagined turning the picture in space (object-based mental transformation). We suggest that this effect relies on shared functional and cortical mechanisms in the posterior parietal cortex associated with both right anodal GVS and mental imagery.
KeywordsSpatial cognition Mental rotation Subjective visual vertical Strategy Human
This work was supported by the Cogito Foundation, the Fondation de Famille Sandoz, the Fondation Odier de Psychophysique, and the Swiss National Science Foundation. We thank Pär Halje for the programming of the stimuli and Dr. Raphaël Holzer for technical assistance.
- Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10:443–446Google Scholar
- Grabherr L, Bach S, Indermaur K, Metzler S, Mast F (2007) Mental transformations of bodies and body-parts in microgravity. J Vest Res (in press)Google Scholar
- Lane NE, Kennedy, RS (1988) A new method for quantifying simulator sickness: development and application of the simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ). Technical Report No. EOTR 88-7, Essex Corporation, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
- Lopez C, Blanke O (2007) Neuropsychology and neurophysiology of self-consciousness. Multisensory and vestibular mechanisms. In: Holderegger A, Sitter-Liver B, Hess CW (eds) Hirnforschung und Menschenbild. Beiträge zur interdisziplinären Verständigung. Schwabe, BaselGoogle Scholar
- Lopez C, Lacour M, Ballester M, Dumitrescu M, Anton J-L, Nazarian B, Roth M, Borel L (2005) Brain activations during subjective visual vertical judgment: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Gait and Posture 21(Suppl 1):13Google Scholar
- Mast FW, Meissner F (2004) Mental transformations of perspective during whole-body roll-rotation. J Vestib Res 14:113Google Scholar
- Ohlmann T, Marendaz C (1991) Vicarious processes involved in spatial perception. In: Wapner S (ed) Bio-psycho-social factors in cognitive style. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 106–129Google Scholar
- Penfield W, Erickson T (1941) Epilepsy and Cerebral Localization, Charles C. Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar