Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 183, Issue 4, pp 541–556 | Cite as

Coordination and concurrency in bimanual rotation tasks when moving away from and toward the body

Research Article

Abstract

In the present series of experiments we investigated how object transport and rotate movements are performed when they are directed away from (Experiment 1) and toward (Experiment 2) the body under both unimanual and bimanual conditions. Our results indicated that unimanual conditions are faster and more efficiently produced than bimanual movements in far peripersonal space, suggesting that there is a cost to performing bimanual movements. However, in near peripersonal space, bimanual same movements were performed in a manner similar to unimanual movements, indicating that there is no significant cost associated with similar bimanual movements that are performed using the lower visual field and in near peripersonal space. Both experiments also indicate that the two hands are tightly synchronized when the two movements being performed require the same rotation. However, when performing bimanual movements where the rotation being performed by the two hands is different, this synchronization is weaker. Finally, the combined results from the two experiments indicated that movements made toward the body are not performed in a similar manner to movements that are made away from the body. Specifically, it is clear from the current studies that movements toward the body are performed faster and possibly that the hands are less synchronized for bimanual movements requiring different rotations by the two hands.

Keywords

Bimanual coordination Rotation Orientation Peripersonal Extrapersonal 

References

  1. Arbib MA (1985) Schemas for temporal organization of behavior. Human Neurobiol 4:63–72Google Scholar
  2. Boessenkool JJ, Nijhof E-J, Erkelens CJ (1999) Variability and correlations in bi-manual pointing movements. Hum Mov Sci 18:525–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryden MP (1977) Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 15(4–5):617–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danckert J, Goodale MA (2001) Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field. Exp Brain Res 137:303–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Danckert J, Goodale MA (2003) The ups and downs of visual perception. In: Johnson SH (ed) Taking action: cognitive neuroscience perspectives on intentional acts. MIT, Cambridge, pp 29–64Google Scholar
  6. Desmurget M, Prablanc C, Arzi M, Rossetti Y, Paulignan Y, Urquizar C (1996) Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements. Exp Brain Res 110:265–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diedrichsen J, Hazeltine E, Kennerley S, Ivry RB (2001) Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychol Sci 12(6):493–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan J, He J, Helms Tillery SI (2005) Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp. Exp Brain Res 171:283–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G (1991) Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. Acta Psychol 77:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grusser O-J (1993) Multimodal structure of the extrapersonal space. In: Hein A, Jeannerod M (eds) Spatially oriented behavior. Springer, New York, pp 251–265Google Scholar
  11. Heuer H (1986) Intermanual interactions during programming of aimred movements: converging evidence for common and specific parameters of control. Psychol Res 48:37–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heuer H, Schmidt RA, Ghodsian D (1995) Generalised motor programs for rapid bimanual tasks. A two-level multiplicative-rate model. Biol Cybern 73:343–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Kritikos A (1999) Attention for action: coordination bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. Brit J Psychol 90(2):247–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson GM, Jackson SR, Husain M, Harvey M, Kramer T, Dow L (2000) The coordination of bimanual prehension movements in a centrally deafferented patient. Brain 123:380–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackson GM, German K, Peacock K (2002) Functional coupling between the limbs during bimanual reach-to-grasp movements. Hum Mov Sci 21:317–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA (1991) Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res 86:199–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelso JAS, Southard DL, Goodman D (1979) On the nature of human interlimb coordination. Science 203:1029–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunde W, Weigelt M (2005) Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept PerformJ Exp 31(1):145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF (1982) Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task. J Neurosci 2(4):399–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mamassian P (1997) Prehension of objects oriented in three-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 114(2):235–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Baba DM, (1984) Bimanual movement control: information processing and interaction effects. Q J Exp Psychol A 36:335–365Google Scholar
  22. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Jeannerod M (1990) The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp Brain Res 79:431–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Jeannerod M (1991) Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position. Exp Brain Res 83:502–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Previc FH (1998) The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol Bull 124(2):123–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Previc FH (1990) Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13:519–575Google Scholar
  26. Rizzolatti G, Gentilucci M, Matelli M (1985) Selective spatial attention: one center, one circuit, or many circuits? In: Posner MI, Marin OSM (eds) Attention and performance XI. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 251–265Google Scholar
  27. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang Y, MacKenzie CL, Summers VA, Booth KS (1998) The structure of object transportation and orientation in human-computer interaction. Proc CHI ‘98, ACM, New York, pp 312–319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Kinesiology and Physical EducationWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations