Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 181, Issue 4, pp 561–570 | Cite as

A new measure for quantifying the bilateral coordination of human gait: effects of aging and Parkinson’s disease

  • Meir Plotnik
  • Nir Giladi
  • Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Research Article

Abstract

The bilateral coordination of locomotion has been described in detail in animal studies and to some degree in man; however, the mechanisms that contribute to the bilateral coordination of gait in humans are not fully understood. The objective of the present study was to develop a measure for quantifying the bilateral coordination of gait and to evaluate the effects of aging and Parkinson’s disease (PD) on this new metric. To this end, we compared the gait of healthy older adults to that of healthy young adults and patients with PD. Specifically, we defined the stride duration of one foot as a gait cycle or 360°, determined the relative timing of contra-lateral heel-strikes, and defined this as the phase, ϕ (ideally, ϕ = 180° for every step). The sum of the coefficient of variation of ϕ and the mean absolute difference between ϕ and 180° was defined as the phase coordination index (PCI), representing variability and inaccuracy, respectively, in phase generation. PCI values were higher (poorer bilateral coordination) in patients with PD in comparison to the healthy older adults (P < 0.006). Although gait speed and stride time variability were similar in the healthy young and older adults, PCI values were significantly higher among the healthy elderly subjects compared to the young adults (P < 0.001). Regression analysis suggests that only about 40% of the variance in the values of PCI can be explained by the combination of gait asymmetry (as defined by the differences in each leg’s swing times), gait speed and stride time variability, pointing to the independent nature of this new metric. This study demonstrates that bilateral coordination of gait deteriorates with aging, further deteriorates in PD, and is not strongly associated with other spatio-temporal features of gait.

Keywords

Blateral coordination Aging Parkinson’s disease Gait 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the subjects for their participation, time and effort. We thank Ms. Galit Yogev, Ms. Michal Leshem and Mr. Ronny Bartsch for their invaluable assistance and Dr. Eli Plotnik for mathematical advice. This work was supported in part by the Inheritance Fund of the Israeli Ministry of Health, NIH grants AG-14100, RR-13622, HD-39838 and AG-08812, by the US-Israel Bi-National Science Foundation, by the Parkinson’s Disease Foundation (PDF), New York and the National Parkinson Foundation (NPF), Miami USA, and by the European Union Sixth Framework Program, FET contract no. 018474-2, Dynamic Analysis of Physiological Networks (DAPHNet).

References

  1. Abe K, Asai Y, Matsuo Y, Nomura T, Sato S, Inoue S, Mizukura I, Sakoda S (2003) Classifying lower limb dynamics in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Res Bull 61:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashtom-Miller JA (2005) In: Hausdorff JM, Alexander NB (eds) Gait disorders evaluation and management. Tayor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 63–100Google Scholar
  3. Baltadjieva R, Giladi N, Gruendlinger L, Peretz C, Hausdorff JM (2006) Marked alterations in the gait timing and rhythmicity of patients with de novo Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci 24:1815–1820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger W, Dietz V, Quintern J (1984) Corrective reactions to stumbling in man: neuronal co-ordination of bilateral leg muscle activity during gait. J Physiol 357:109–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohannon RW (1997) Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20–79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing 26:15–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Debaere F, Wenderoth N, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Swinnen SP (2004) Cerebellar and premotor function in bimanual coordination: parametric neural responses to spatiotemporal complexity and cycling frequency. Neuroimage 21:1416–1427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dietz V (2002) Do human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination?. Trends Neurosci 25:462–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dietz V (2003) Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1379–1389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietz V, Zijlstra W, Prokop T, Berger W (1995) Leg muscle activation during gait in Parkinson’s disease: adaptation and interlimb coordination. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 97:408–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fahn S, Elton R, Members of the UPDRS Developmental Committee (1987) Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein MS (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Florham Park, pp 153–163Google Scholar
  11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelb DJ, Oliver E, Gilman S (1999) Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 56:33–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Counsell C, Giladi N, Holloway RG, Moore CG, Wenning GK, Yahr MD, Seidl L (2004) Movement disorder society task force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations. Mov Disord 19:1020–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hausdorff JM, Mitchell SL, Firtion R, Peng CK, Cudkowicz ME, Wei JY, Goldberger AL (1997) Altered fractal dynamics of gait: reduced stride-interval correlations with aging and Huntington’s disease. J Appl Physiol 82:262–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hausdorff JM, Cudkowicz ME, Firtion R, Wei JY, Goldberger AL (1998) Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: stride-to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s disease. Mov Disord 13:428–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD (1967) Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology 57:S11–S26Google Scholar
  17. Hughes AJ, Ben Shlomo Y, Daniel SE, Lees AJ (2001) What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson’s disease: a clinicopathologic study. 1992. Neurology 57:S34–S38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kjaerulff O, Kiehn O (1996) Distribution of networks generating and coordinating locomotor activity in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro: a lesion study. J Neurosci 16:5777–5794PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee TD, Blandin Y, Proteau L (1996) Effects of task instructions and oscillation frequency on bimanual coordination. Psychol Res 59:100–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morley JE (2003) Mobility performance: a high-tech test for geriatricians. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:712–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris ME, Iansek R, Matyas TA, Summers JJ (1996) Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease. Normalization strategies and underlying mechanisms. Brain 119:551–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Obhi SS, Haggard P, Taylor J, Pascual-Leone A (2002) rTMS to the supplementary motor area disrupts bimanual coordination. Motor Control 6:319–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pang MY, Yang JF (2001) Interlimb co-ordination in human infant stepping. J Physiol 533:617–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plotnik M, Giladi N, Balash Y, Peretz C, Hausdorff JM (2005) Is freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease related to asymmetric motor function?. Ann Neurol 57:656–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prokop T, Berger W, Zijlstra W, Dietz V (1995) Adaptational and learning processes during human split-belt locomotion: interaction between central mechanisms and afferent input. Exp Brain Res 106:449–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Prince F, Labelle H (2000) Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. Gait Posture 12:34–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sofuwa O, Niuwboer A, Desloovere K, Willems AM, Chavert F, Jonkers I (2005) Quantitative gait analysis in Parkinson’s disease: comparison with healthy control group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1007–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ullen F, Forssberg H, Ehrsson HH (2003) Neural networks for the coordination of the hands in time. J Neurophysiol 89:1126–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE (1990) Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther 70:340–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yogev G, Giladi N, Peretz C, Springer S, Simon ES, Hausdorff JM (2005) Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson’s disease: which aspects of gait are attention demanding?. Eur J Neurosci 22:1248–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yogev G, Plotnik M, Peretz C, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM (2006) Gait asymmetry in patients with Parkinson’s disease and elderly fallers: when does the bilateral coordination of gait require attention? Exp Brain Res (e-pub a head of print)Google Scholar
  32. Zehr EP, Duysens J (2004) Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. Neuroscientist 10:347–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zmitrewicz RJ, Neptune RR, Walden JG, Rogers WE, Bosker GW (2006) The effect of foot and ankle prosthetic components on braking and propulsive impulses during transtibial amputee gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:1334–1339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meir Plotnik
    • 1
  • Nir Giladi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Movement Disorders UnitTel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel-AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  4. 4.Division on AgingHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations