The dominant and nondominant arms are specialized for stabilizing different features of task performance
- 933 Downloads
We have previously proposed a model of motor lateralization, in which the two arms are differentially specialized for complementary control processes. During aimed movements, the dominant arm shows advantages for coordinating intersegmental dynamics as required for specifying trajectory speed and direction, while the nondominant arm shows advantages in controlling limb impedance, as required for accurate final position control. We now directly test this model of lateralization by comparing performance of the two arms under two different tasks: one in which reaching movement is made from one fixed starting position to three different target positions; and the other in which reaching is made from three different starting positions to one fixed target position. For the dominant arm, performance was most accurate when reaching from one fixed starting position to multiple targets. In contrast, nondominant arm performance was most accurate when reaching toward a single target from multiple start locations. These findings contradict the idea that motor lateralization reflects a global advantage of one “dominant” hemisphere/limb system. Instead, each hemisphere/limb system appears specialized for stabilizing different aspects of task performance.
KeywordsHuman Hemispheric lateralization Motor control Movement representation Handedness
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01HD39311.
- Duff SV, Sainburg RL (2006) Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position. Exp Brain Res, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
- Liepmann H (1905) Die linke Hemisphäre und das Handeln. MMW Münch Med Wochenschr 49:2375–2378Google Scholar
- Sainburg RL, Ghez C, Kalakanis D (1999) Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. J Neurophysiol 81:1040–1056Google Scholar
- Vallortigara G, Rogers LJ (2005) Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav Brain Sci 28: 575–89; discussion 589–633Google Scholar
- Wang J, Sainburg RL (2006) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness. Exp Brain Res in pressGoogle Scholar
- Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882Google Scholar