Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 181, Issue 2, pp 221–228 | Cite as

Visual flow influences gait transition speed and preferred walking speed

  • Betty J. Mohler
  • William B. Thompson
  • Sarah H. Creem-Regehr
  • Herbert L. PickJr
  • William H. WarrenJr
Research Article

Abstract

It is typically assumed that basic features of human gait are determined by purely biomechanical factors. In two experiments, we test whether gait transition speed and preferred walking speed are also influenced by visual information about the speed of self-motion. The visual flow during treadmill locomotion was manipulated to be slower than, matched to, or faster than the physical gait speed (visual gains of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0). Higher flow rates elicit significantly lower transition speeds for both the Walk–Run and Run–Walk transition, as expected. Similarly, higher flow rates elicit significantly lower preferred walking speeds. These results suggest that visual information becomes calibrated to mechanical or energetic aspects of gait and contributes to the control of locomotor behavior.

References

  1. Alexander RM (1983) Walking and running. Am Sci 72:348–354Google Scholar
  2. Barbeau H, Rossignol S (1987) Recovery of locomotion after chronic spinalization in the adult cat. Brain Res 412:84–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bélanger M, Drew T, Provencher J, Rossignnol S (1996) A comparison of treadmill locomotion in adalt cats before and after spinal transection. J Neurophysiol 76:471–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beuter A, Lalonde F (1989) Analysis of a phase transition in human locomotion using singularity theory. Neurosci Res Commun 3:127–132Google Scholar
  5. Cavagna GA, Kaneko M (1977) Mechanical work and efficiency in level walking and running. J Physiol 268:467–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavagna GA, Thys H, Zamboni A (1976) The sources of external work in level walking and running. J Physiol 262:639–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniels GL, Newell KM (2002) Perceived task expectations and the walk-run gait transition. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Army Science Conference, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniels GL, Newell KM (2003) Attentional focus influences the walk-run transition in human locomotion. Biol Psychol 63:163–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diedrich FJ, Warren WH (1995) Why change gaits? Dynamics of the walk-run transition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:183–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drew T (2000) Neuronal mechanisms for the adaptive control of locomotion In: Proceedings of the international symposium on adaptive motion of animals and machines, Montreal, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  11. Eidelberg E, Story JL, Nystel J (1980) Stepping by chronic spinal cats. Exp Brain Res 40:241–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falls HB, Humphrey LD (1976) Energy cost of running and walking in young women. Med Sci Sports 8:9–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Farley CT, Taylor CR (1991) A mechanical trigger for the trot-gallop transition in horses. Science 253:306–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatuga GA, Warren WH (1996) The role of visual perception with respect to gait transition patterns. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis, Brown UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Full RJ (1989) Mechanics and energetics of terrestrial locomotion: from bipeds to polypeds. In: Wieser W, Gnaiger E (eds) Energy transformation in cells and animals, Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  16. Gatesy SM, Biewener AA (1991) Bipedal locomotion: effects of speed, size and limb posture in birds and humans. J Zool Lond 224:127–147Google Scholar
  17. Grillner S, Zangger P (1979) On the central generation of locomotion in the low spinal cat. Exp Brain Res 34:241–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollerbach JM, Xu Y, Christensen R, Jacobsen SC (2000) Design specifications for the second generation Sarcos treadport locomotion interface. In: Haptics Symposium, Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, vol DSC-Vol. 69-2 November, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 1293–1298Google Scholar
  19. Hreljac A (1993) Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. Med Sci Sports Exer 25:1158–1162Google Scholar
  20. Hreljac A, Imamura R, Escamilla RF, Casebolt J, Sison M (2005) Preferred and energetically optimal transition speeds during backward human locomotion. J Sports sci Med 4:446–454Google Scholar
  21. Konczak J (1994) Effects of optic flow on the kinematics of human gait: a comparison of young and older adults. J Motor Behav 26:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kram R, Domingo A, Ferris DP (1997) Effect of reduced gravity on the preferred walk-run transition speed. J Exp Biol 200:821–826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kram R, Taylor R (1990) Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature 346:265–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee DN, Lishman JR (1975) Visual proprioceptive control of stance. J Hum Mov Stud 1:87–95Google Scholar
  25. Lovely RG, Gregor RJ, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (1990) Weight-bearing hindlimb stepping in treadmill-exercised adult spinal cats. Brain Res 514Google Scholar
  26. Malcolm P, Lenoir M, Aerts P, Segers V, Clercq DD (2005) Treadmill versus overground run to walk and walk to run transition speed in unsteady state locomotion conditions. In: Proceedings of the 20th congress of the international society of biomechanics and 29th annual meeting of the American society of biomechanics, Cleveland, p 555Google Scholar
  27. Margaria R (1976) Biomechanics and energetics of muscular exercise. Clarendon Press, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  28. Margaria R, Cerretelli P, Aghemo P, Sassi G (1963) Energy cost of running. J Appl Physiol 18:367–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mercier J, Gallais DL, Durand M, Goudal C, Micallef JP, Prefaut C (1994) Energy expenditure and cardiorespiratory responses at the transition between walking and running. Eur J Appl Physiol 69:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minetti AE, Ardigo LP, Saibene F (1994) The transition between walking and running in humans: Metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. Acta Physiol Scand 150:315–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mohler BJ, Thompson WB, Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Pick HL Jr, Rieser JJ (2007) Calibration of locomotion due to visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 4(1)Google Scholar
  32. Pailhous J, Ferrandez AM, Fluckiger M, Baumberger B (1990) Unintentional modulations of human gait by optic flow. Behav Brain Res 38:275–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pearson KG, Rossignol S (1991) Fictive motor patterns in chronic spinal cats. J Neurophysiol 66:1874–1887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Prilutsky BI, Gregor R (2001) Swing- and support-related muscle actions differentially trigger human walk-run and run-walk transitions. J Exp Psychol 204:2277–2287Google Scholar
  35. Prokop T, Schubert M, Berger W (1997) Visual influence on human locomotion. Modulation to changes in optic flow Exp Brain Res 114:63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rieser JJ, Pick HL Jr, Ashmead D, Garing A (1995) Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. J Exp Psychol: Hum percept perform 21:480–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sparrow W, Newell K (1998) Metabolic energy expenditure and the regulation of movement economy. Pyschonomic Bull Rev Psychonomic Soc 5:173–196Google Scholar
  38. Thorstensson A, Roberthson H (1987) Adaptations to changing speed in human locomotion: speed of transition between walking and running. Acta Physiol Scand 131:211–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turvey MT, Holt KG, Obusek J, Salo A, Kugler PN (1996) Adiabatic transformability hypothesis of human locomotion. Biol Cybern 74:107–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warren WH, Kay BA, Yilmaz EH (1996) Visual control of posture during walking: functional specificity. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 22:818–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Betty J. Mohler
    • 1
  • William B. Thompson
    • 1
  • Sarah H. Creem-Regehr
    • 2
  • Herbert L. PickJr
    • 3
  • William H. WarrenJr
    • 4
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  4. 4.Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations